Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What do you think of Shepard Smith's reaction?
1 posted on 07/08/2011 2:31:49 PM PDT by ladyellen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ladyellen

Let’s not be stupid. It falls under negligence.


2 posted on 07/08/2011 2:33:13 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."

--Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand

3 posted on 07/08/2011 2:33:53 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen
Casey Anthony Case Fuels Push in States for 'Caylee's Law'

|

Swell. More laws. Just what we needed.

4 posted on 07/08/2011 2:34:04 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

So what is it going to be...a law against incompetent prosecutors???


5 posted on 07/08/2011 2:36:18 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen
Butthead Smith is at least two good reasons not to watch television!

This whole fiasco is more reflexive reaction to an image painted by the pimps of the media and the law industry.

Where is the outcry against permitting the pimps of the media to use a trial of a crime as a prop to promote their emotional EXPERTISE?. The trial should be taped for later discussion and analyses, but NO BROADCASTS OF A TRIAL IN PROGRESS. This certainly adds to the length of the trial

Where is the outcry against prosecutors (mostly political appointees) being held accountable for bringing a case without sufficient evidence (i.e., WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF DEATH?)

Having TV programs 365/24/7 reported as NEWS is absurd and it should STOP!
9 posted on 07/08/2011 2:50:14 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

Florida needs a Dexter.


12 posted on 07/08/2011 3:01:19 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

shouldn’t we have a Terry’s law first?

Or perhaps a John Lennon’s law?


13 posted on 07/08/2011 3:04:54 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

Would this law apply to women who abort their children?


14 posted on 07/08/2011 3:12:19 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

I forget who, but someone (Instapundit?) suggested a while back that as a rule of thumb, any law named after a child is probably a bad law.


17 posted on 07/08/2011 3:17:44 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

Flabbergasted. He got it right. Now we’ve got one more piece of useless legislation.


18 posted on 07/08/2011 3:20:15 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

Let’s make it mandatory to call the government every night and tell them how are whole day went. For confessions of capital crimes press #3.


22 posted on 07/08/2011 3:58:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

Don’t they have negligent homicide already? Reckless endangerment that resulted in homicide?


25 posted on 07/08/2011 4:10:09 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

You can’t pass a law that will keep prosecutors from inflating charges to something they can’t prove. I have seen that as a juror and so has my wife. It is evil to have to vote “not guilty” for someone who is guilty as sin but was charged with way more than the prosecution can prove. In this system the prosecution has to prove its case. If the perp is charged with more than there is evidence to show then the perp will walk.


27 posted on 07/08/2011 5:18:31 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ladyellen

These trials jump out of gear with the media coverage. No TV and only a pool representative from the written media allowed the court room. After that....pound sand!


28 posted on 07/08/2011 5:20:10 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson