Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey Anthony Case Fuels Push in States for 'Caylee's Law'
Fox News ^ | 12/8/2011 | The Associated Press

Posted on 07/08/2011 2:31:45 PM PDT by ladyellen

The trial and acquittal of Casey Anthony has spawned a slew of proposed laws named after her 2-year-old daughter Caylee, as lawmakers and their constituents try to extract some measure of reform out of a case that ended -- for many onlookers -- with frustration.

The state proposals, which sprung up after an Oklahoma woman started an online petition drive Tuesday, would generally make it a felony for a parent not to report the death or disappearance of his or her child in a certain period of time.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: ilgipper

There is, in the State of Oregon, a woman in prison whose daughter disappeared and the woman never reported it nor will she say what happened to her daughter. Prosecutors went after her, she was convicted, and is now serving time. [The suspicion is she murdered her daughter.]

Unfortunately, I can’t remember of what she was convicted.


21 posted on 07/08/2011 3:30:15 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ladyellen

Let’s make it mandatory to call the government every night and tell them how are whole day went. For confessions of capital crimes press #3.


22 posted on 07/08/2011 3:58:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

I have been thinking about this case and wondering if “child abandonment” or a variation thereof might fit.

The last time anyone knew of Caylee’s situation, she was with Casey but not with the family, as I understand it. When in phone contacts Cindy would ask about Caylee, Casey would offer some answer to molify her but certainly did not tell her Caylee was “gone”. Eventually, it came out after 31 days that Caylee was no longer with Casey.

If you boil it all down, to me Casey was the legally responsible adult who had custodial care of Caylee at the time of Caylee’s disappearance. We know she didn’t report her missing. We know she partied and her friends began to notice that Caylee was no longer a part of the scene, as from time to time she was before. We know she lied repeatedly to them and later to her parents and police.

We know she refused ever to account for Caylee’s whereabouts, for truth never came from her, only lies.

We know eventually Caylee was found dead and greatly decomposed.

If you couldn’t call this child abandonment of Caylee by Casey, what would qualify as child abandonment?


23 posted on 07/08/2011 4:07:21 PM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

My daughter thinks the verdict was all about sensationalism and book deals for the jurists. A guilty verdict was expected and wouldn’t have generated the shock that a not guilty verdict did. Follow the money. If that is so, it is shameful what our courts have become.


24 posted on 07/08/2011 4:08:31 PM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ladyellen

Don’t they have negligent homicide already? Reckless endangerment that resulted in homicide?


25 posted on 07/08/2011 4:10:09 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Mary Winkler is another one that comes to mind. Except she got her kids back and her in laws’ money. Now she is living high off the hog, guilty as sin but free as a bird just like Casey will do.


26 posted on 07/08/2011 4:11:33 PM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyellen

You can’t pass a law that will keep prosecutors from inflating charges to something they can’t prove. I have seen that as a juror and so has my wife. It is evil to have to vote “not guilty” for someone who is guilty as sin but was charged with way more than the prosecution can prove. In this system the prosecution has to prove its case. If the perp is charged with more than there is evidence to show then the perp will walk.


27 posted on 07/08/2011 5:18:31 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyellen

These trials jump out of gear with the media coverage. No TV and only a pool representative from the written media allowed the court room. After that....pound sand!


28 posted on 07/08/2011 5:20:10 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

“The end result of this law will be concientious parents overwhelming the police system . . .”

Bingo. Everything you said.

Plus—Who determines when the child *actually* went missing? If one could report the precise time the child actually went missing, the odds are that the child wouldn’t go missing in the first place. Or does the law imply that *realization of missing* starts the clock? How in hell does this law get enforced?

BOR, after redeeming himself slightly, went right back to Baxter-mode on this one.


29 posted on 07/08/2011 5:56:12 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson