Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Gets Even Worse
New York Times ^ | July,3 2011 | Editorial/New York Times

Posted on 07/03/2011 7:55:43 PM PDT by moonshinner_09

If you thought the do-it-yourself anti-immigrant schemes couldn’t get any more repellent, you were wrong. New laws in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina are following — and in some ways outdoing — Arizona’s attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented, no matter the damage to the Constitution, public safety, local economies and immigrant families. The laws vary in their details but share a common strategy: to make it impossible for people without papers to live without fear.

They give new powers to local police untrained in immigration law. They force businesses to purge workforces and schools to check students’ immigration status. And they greatly increase the danger of unreasonable searches, false arrests, racial profiling and other abuses, not just against immigrants, but anyone who may look like some officer’s idea of an illegal immigrant.

The laws empower local police officers to demand the documents of people they meet, and to detain those they suspect are here illegally. That means they can make warrantless arrests for assumed civil immigration violations, a stunning abuse of power.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Arizona; US: Georgia; US: New York; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: alabama; aliens; alltheliesfittoprint; amnesty; arizona; border; georgia; immigrantlist; immigration; mexico; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; propaganda; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: moonshinner_09

If the truth isn’t on your side, scream and shout and call your opponents nasty names.


21 posted on 07/03/2011 8:11:17 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09
what ever it takes...
22 posted on 07/03/2011 8:12:12 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What was the headline? It gets worse? Nope. It gets better.


23 posted on 07/03/2011 8:12:30 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09
They give new powers to local police untrained in immigration law. They force businesses to purge workforces and schools to check students’ immigration status. And they greatly increase the danger of unreasonable searches, false arrests, racial profiling and other abuses, not just against immigrants, but anyone who may look like some officer’s idea of an illegal immigrant.

Change it to drug dealers (since both are criminals) and see how stupid it sounds, observe:

They give new powers to local police untrained in drug dealers. They force businesses to purge workforces and schools to check students’ drug dealer status. And they greatly increase the danger of unreasonable searches, false arrests, racial profiling and other abuses, not just against drug dealers, but anyone who may look like some officer’s idea of a drug dealer.

24 posted on 07/03/2011 8:12:45 PM PDT by RockinRight (If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

“The laws vary in their details but share a common strategy: to make it impossible for people without papers to live without fear.”

If you don’t have papers, you should not be here. Period. End of discussion. Try going to any other country without permission and papers, including the countries of origin of those who come here without papers, and see what happens to you.

If the illegals who come to this country were likely Republican voters, the NYT would be printing articles almost daily about how these people were law breakers and should be expelled from the country.

As a group, liberals are not, and have never been motivated by compassion and tolerance. They are motivated by their own sense of specialness and self-righteousness.


25 posted on 07/03/2011 8:12:57 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Yeah, how DARE the American people insist on enforced borders.

We’re heartless bastards.

Hey, I hear circulation for the NY Slimes is in the toilet. I wonder why. Not.


26 posted on 07/03/2011 8:14:08 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

The open border traitors are squealing.

We must be doing something right.


27 posted on 07/03/2011 8:14:53 PM PDT by Travis McGee (Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Yup. As a Native Born Citizen, hard-working and productive, I have to produce identification papers all the time. It's no big deal, just part of my life and has been for years.

As far as I can see, the only folks who don't have to produce papers are the folks who are here illegally. They seem to be immune from most of the legal niceties which are part of my normal life, I guess they've had it easy.

28 posted on 07/03/2011 8:15:16 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Good work....drive them all to Cali, Mass. and NY... sooner or later it will break those stupid inhabitants.
29 posted on 07/03/2011 8:18:23 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Whats to stop them from going back from whence they came? Is anybody stopping them?


30 posted on 07/03/2011 8:18:23 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks moonshinner_09. Just when you thought an op-ed from the New York Slimes couldn't get any more repellent:
f you thought the do-it-yourself anti-immigrant schemes couldn't get any more repellent, you were wrong. New laws in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina are following - and in some ways outdoing - Arizona's attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented... to make it impossible for people without papers to live without fear.
Does this include Obama?


31 posted on 07/03/2011 8:19:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

What don’t these “F”ing morons at the NYT understand about the words ILLEGAL Immigrant? Deport them, one and ALL, every one you catch, ALL OF THEM!


32 posted on 07/03/2011 8:20:53 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

no matter the damage to the Constitution, public safety, local economies and immigrant families??????

Projection run amuck!! Who is damaging what and who here?


33 posted on 07/03/2011 8:21:56 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

As teh economy gets worse, we’re going to see more people demanding more and more intense methods of identifying and expelling illegals and high time as well. This time the politicians are actually listening to the electorate and also taking measures. This isn’t some gestapo-esque attack, but a measure that will ensure that people who have no business being here are shoved out and kept out.


34 posted on 07/03/2011 8:26:05 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

WTH? Virginia’s not on the list? McDonnell, you’re slacking.


35 posted on 07/03/2011 8:26:26 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Must be good if the NY Times hates it


36 posted on 07/03/2011 8:27:57 PM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

If you thought the do-it-yourself anti-immigrant schemes couldn’t get any more repellent,

Mr Editor, New York Times, you are showing your bigotry in the first ten sentences of your piece;

it is "anti-ILLEGAL immigrant" schemes; as in people who illegally and disrespectfully sneak into another country, exploit the taxpayer's resources, compete for employment, pay no taxes, all without honoring the honest civil orderly behavior that I, our fellow global citizens, and probably even you, subscribe to in every sovereign international border crossing. The transgressors of such all of whom come from a resource-graced, legitimate nation which apparently encourages its less affluent classes to invade neighboring nations. You approve of that?

We have known you as a political agenda-ridden shill, now exposed.

Johnny Suntrade

37 posted on 07/03/2011 8:27:57 PM PDT by jnsun (The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

How much is the NYT in debt now?


38 posted on 07/03/2011 8:29:50 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

Those trained in immigration law are NOT doing such a bang up job, or else there wouldn't be some 20+ million illegals here.
39 posted on 07/03/2011 8:30:04 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

The NYT inderstand it the same way Marsha Coakley does, and I quote “It is not illegal to be illegal in MA”

Yes, she really said that. Scott Brown, although he won against this lame brain, was not available for comment.


40 posted on 07/03/2011 8:30:35 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson