Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inflation climbs to 3.6% in May. Palin was right!
American Thinker ^ | June 23, 2011 | Howard Richman & Raymond Richman

Posted on 06/23/2011 5:11:51 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

On June 15, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the inflation data for May. If you didn't hear about the new data, you are not alone -- the mainstream media buried the story. Why? Inflation hit 3.6% in May, even though gasoline prices actually fell that month. Inflation has been rising since November, as shown in the graph below:

(CHART AT LINK)

These rising prices were largely caused by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's rapid expansion of the U.S. money supply, known as QE2 (Quantitative Easing 2). But inflation wasn't supposed to get this high. Back in November, Bernanke told his fellow central bankers that the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee (FOMC) was aiming for an inflation rate no higher than 2%. Specifically, he said:

This policy tool will be used in a manner that is measured and responsive to economic conditions. In particular, the Committee stated that it would review its asset-purchase program regularly in light of incoming information and would adjust the program as needed to meet its objectives. Importantly, the Committee remains unwaveringly committed to price stability and does not seek inflation above the level of 2 percent or a bit less that most FOMC participants see as consistent with the Federal Reserve's mandate.

Bernanke is like a driver who steps on the brakes, then floors the gas pedal, then steps on the brakes again, then floors the gas pedal again. His tenure at the Federal Reserve has been marked by the erratic swings in the U.S. money supply, shown in the graph below:

(GRAPH AT LINK)

From May 2010 to May 2011, Bernanke had his pedal to the metal. He grew M1 (the amount of money in cash and in checking accounts) at a 13.4% rate. Due to lag time, this didn't get inflation climbing rapidly until February. Now that inflation has gotten started, it may be hard to stop because it can get a momentum of its own.

Back in November, Governor Palin took on QE2 and President Obama's defense of it. Her predictions have turned out to be correct. When making her case against QE2, she argued that it could cause inflation, but would not much help U.S. net exports and business investment, the two factors needed to grow the U.S. economy.

Indeed, worsening net exports (exports minus imports) have been keeping the United States stuck in its current economic stagnation. When imports go up relative to exports, Americans get more debt and lose jobs, whereas when exports go up, relative to imports, Americans get more income and gain jobs. The decline in net exports may be slowing or preventing the U.S. economic recovery.

Bernanke hoped that QE2 would weaken the dollar which would turn U.S. net exports around. But Palin predicted that any positive effects would be temporary. In November she wrote:

Will driving the dollar down in this way do anything to boost U.S. exports? The short answer is not really. A weaker dollar will temporarily boost exports by making our goods cheaper to sell; but inevitably other countries will respond in kind, triggering the kind of currency wars economists are warning us about.

Indeed, so far Palin has been correct. QE2's effect upon net exports appears to have been temporary. Although U.S. net exports worsened more slowly in November and December, they resumed their economy-sapping slide in February, as shown in the graph below.

(GRAPH AT LINK)

Business investment is another key to economic growth, it combines the money spent by businesses on new tools and structures, such as when businesses develop new energy resources or build new factories. When businesses spend money on tools and structures, they put Americans to work making the tools and building the structures. Later, the improved tools and structures give American workers more productive work, resulting in higher wages. Bernanke had hoped that QE2 would stimulate business investment. But, in November, Palin predicted that QE2 would have little effect upon business investment. She wrote:

Will QE2 then at least boost domestic investment? No, again. As I explained in my speech in Phoenix, the reason banks aren't lending and businesses aren't investing isn't because of insufficient access to credit. There's plenty of money around, it's just that no one's willing to spend it. Big businesses especially have been hoarding cash. They're not expanding or adding to their workforce because there's just too much uncertainty created by a lot of big government experiments that aren't working. It's the President's own policies that are creating this uncertainty.

Indeed, as the graph below shows, the rate of growth in real fixed investment slowed in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, despite QE2:

(GRAPH AT LINK)

Palin argued that QE2 was a dangerous experiment that risked inflation. She urged Obama to instead balance budgets, cut taxes and reduce burdensome business regulation. In November, she concluded:

If the President was serious about getting the economy moving again, he'd stop supporting the Fed's dangerous experiments with our currency and focus instead on what actually works: reducing government spending and boosting business investment through good old fashioned supply side reforms (cutting taxes and reducing overly burdensome regulations). Simply running the printing presses in order to avoid paying off your debts is no way for a great nation to behave.

In May, she added balanced trade to her recipe for economic recovery. After meeting with Donald Trump, she said:

"What do we have in common? Our love for this country, a desire to see our economy put back on the right track," Palin told reporters. "To have a balanced trade arrangement with other countries across this world so Americans can have our jobs, our industries, our manufacturing again. And exploiting responsibly our natural resources. We can do that again if we make good decisions."

The bulk of the U.S. trade deficit (i.e., of our negative net exports) is with China. When Trump was testing the waters for a possible presidential run, he made President Obama's incompetent negotiations with China a cornerstone of his campaign. With Chinese aggregate demand growing rapidly and U.S. aggregate demand stagnant, economists would normally expect the Chinese trade surplus with the United States to be shrinking. But President Obama has let the Chinese government reduce U.S. net exports to China month after month, as shown by the new 12-month lows reached in recent months in the graph below:

(GRAPH AT LINK)

Obama negotiates with China from a position of weakness. He goes into each meeting ruling out the possibility of the U.S. putting tariffs upon Chinese products, even though the Chinese government has already placed high tariff and other barriers upon U.S. products. The U.S. need not negotiate from a position of weakness. Under world trade rules, it is entitled to impose trade balancing tariffs whenever it is running chronic trade deficits. Our proposal for scaled tariffs would let the United States (and any other country harmed by large chronic trade deficits) achieve higher net exports with or without the cooperation of its trading partners.

The mainstream media pretend that Palin is stupid. But she is actually blessed with a very rare commodity these days - economic common sense. She is the only potential presidential candidate currently advocating the three basic principles that would restore economic stability and long-term growth to the American economy: (1) balanced monetary growth, (2) balanced budgets, and (3) balanced trade.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bernanke; china; economy; herecomethepdstrolls; inflation; obama; palin; palinnewsnetwork; pds; recession; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Thank you very much for showing his bias and showing his complete lack of objectivity and credibility regarding Palin. You saved me a lot of trouble. Thanks immensely. I appreciate it.

Just doing a public service.

And the Shenandoah Valley between Roanoke and Winchester is simply a beautiful place to go. Lots of history there too.

121 posted on 06/23/2011 8:26:54 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
RE :"There is no "draft Rick Perry" club among FR's Palin supporter ranks. The people pushing him around here are either Texans or GOP "Anybody but Palin" hacks. "

Good to hear. 'Anybody but Palin' themes seem counter-productive to me. Not very logical.

122 posted on 06/23/2011 8:31:11 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

The BLS publishes thousands of CPI indexes each month, including the headline All Items CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the CPI-U for All Items Less Food and Energy. The latter series, widely referred to as the “core” CPI, is closely watched by many economic analysts and policymakers under the belief that food and energy prices are volatile and are subject to price shocks that cannot be damped through monetary policy. However, all consumer goods and services, including food and energy, are represented in the headline CPI.

Most importantly, none of the prominent legislated uses of the CPI excludes food and energy. Social security and federal retirement benefits are updated each year for inflation by the All Items CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). Individual income tax parameters and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) returns are based on the All Items CPI-U.


123 posted on 06/23/2011 8:32:23 AM PDT by Huck (The Antifederalists were right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Comments?

Just one...since Palin was months and months behind the curve on this why is she even mentioned at all?

124 posted on 06/23/2011 8:36:47 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
The latter series, widely referred to as the “core” CPI, is closely watched by many economic analysts and policymakers under the belief that food and energy prices are volatile and are subject to price shocks that cannot be damped through monetary policy.

They do now.

Did they always, and are all of the CPI indexes in the chart using the same basis for calculating the CPI for every year on the chart that's being compared? That's the question.

125 posted on 06/23/2011 8:37:14 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Jury duty? But just yesterday all the palinistas were 100% certain that it was the salmon season that garaged the bus.


126 posted on 06/23/2011 8:40:04 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; org.whodat
Remind me how many Tea Party and other conservatives that she got elected to office in 2010.

__________________________________

Zero. Unless you want to argue that the conservative voters in America can't think or decide how to vote all by their little selves.

127 posted on 06/23/2011 8:42:56 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
On the “prayer” thread, (One poster) “prayed” that those of us who “hate” Palin, have been cursed and damned to hell, God's wrath, etc,,,. Man, this is getting truly insane here!
128 posted on 06/23/2011 8:43:27 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
It's apples to apples. Here's a similar chart..CPI-U All items.


129 posted on 06/23/2011 8:43:40 AM PDT by Huck (The Antifederalists were right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Ron Paul was predicting this when Palin was stumping for Jack Ripper McCain in 2008.


130 posted on 06/23/2011 8:44:26 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I do believe current polls say those little old dumb-ass conservatives seem to make up their own minds.
131 posted on 06/23/2011 8:45:27 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

That’s all fine and dandy. I happen to think the inflation fears are overhyped by those selling book. Bernanke WISHES he could have trouble with inflation (like China.) Instead, he’s got a Japan-style deflationary mess and a gubmint making it worse all the time (with a populace that still doesn’t get it).


132 posted on 06/23/2011 8:49:52 AM PDT by Huck (The Antifederalists were right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/45_of_gop_primary_voters_say_it_s_bad_for_party_if_palin_enters_presidential_race


133 posted on 06/23/2011 8:50:47 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

It is Salmon season in Alaska - Todd is fishing in the Salmon run right now in Bristol Bay, it’s in the peak season as we speak and legally he must be there to fish or lose his license on his business but also we found out last night that Sarah has jury duty as well. Boy you guys can’t google anything? Sheesh!


134 posted on 06/23/2011 8:53:51 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Against which potential candidate for President? Got a link? I guess not!


135 posted on 06/23/2011 8:56:10 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH; PSYCHO-FREEP; Bigtigermike; org.whodat; GatorGirl
To all of you who talk as if you know the facts...especially the one who wrote - " I specifically pointed out that of all of the potential candidates, she was the only one taking the lead on this issue" - here is a story from 2010 about Bachmann taking on QE2 and stating very clearly that it will cause inflation...

"Rep. Michele Bachmann, head of the House Tea Party Caucus, tells Newsmax that the Federal Reserve’s plan to increase the money supply by buying government securities is a “huge mistake” that will boost inflation and amount to “stealing from the American people.”

Read more: Bachmann: Fed Easing is ‘Huge Mistake,’ Will Boost Inflation

http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/Bachmann-Fed-Easing-Huge/2010/11/23/id/377925

Of course, all palinistas are free to ignore yet another fact.

136 posted on 06/23/2011 9:02:01 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
legally he must be there to fish or lose his license on his business.....

_________________________________

Citation please? Not that I don't believe you although you have clearly mis-stated the facts on at least two posts on this very thread.

137 posted on 06/23/2011 9:04:39 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; RED SOUTH; PSYCHO-FREEP; Bigtigermike; org.whodat; GatorGirl
Oh look.....even Romney warned about QE leading to inflation....in 2009!

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/02/mitt-romney-warns-of-hyperinflation-if.html

138 posted on 06/23/2011 9:09:29 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
RE :”Jury duty? But just yesterday all the palinistas were 100% certain that it was the salmon season that garaged the bus.

Trouble maker, You are the reason I got three pings lecturing me on her jury duty when it had nothing to do with my point :)

They got the jury duty tweet on their smart phones but she didn't tell them what she would be doing after it was over, so as usual they have to wing it. Meanwhile the MSM has moved on once again. Rick Perry is likely to be the next MSM focus of attention now that he says he is 'thinking of running', definite MSM live bait.

139 posted on 06/23/2011 9:15:29 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
She is not going to run. There will be so much spinning here that I'll have to strap myself down to keep from being thrown across the room by the centrifugal force.
140 posted on 06/23/2011 9:22:48 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson