They would be glad to send out a couple of missionaries, with the misnomer 'elder' on their name placard to answer all of your questions.
They came to my door once and I smilingly said, "Aren't you two a little young to be elders?"
They laughed and I got them to leave by reminding them that the entire sub-division was marked as "Private Property - No Soliciating" and that the HOA (Home Owner's Association) dictated that we were not to acknowledge any one coming to our doors without an invitation, and if they persisted, just to call the sheriff.
I love that one!
Sorry but I will apply that test. I will vote for a Christian or Jewish person for President. Not a mormon, JW, muzzy etc...
Hey, Romney...I don’t really care about your Mormon faith.
I care that you’re just another socialist - much like Obama except you happen to have an “R” next to your name.
You will never, ever get my vote.
Good-bye.
Of course, Mitt doesn't mention one single thing about some new Mormon "prophet" dictating something to him that won't be made "doctrine" for 21 years after that...Joseph Smith started sleeping around with a 16 yo house servant in 1831...then he conveniently instituted polygamy to cover that up...it wasn't until 1852 when the Mormons finally had to go public with a polygamy doctrine...only after Gunnison's national book exposed them in Utah!
Let me get this straight...Mitt was a rep for the church...
...as a missionary in France for two years...
...then as an Lds bishop in MA for X # of years...
...then as a stake prez for the Lds church for X # of years...
...but he isn't to be id'd as a church spokesperson.
(Oh, I get it...)
I am sooo tired of the ignorant misusing Article VI of the Constitution like this! How can somebody alleged to be so intelligent be so ignorant?
Our constitutional framers included a provision that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States” (Article VI). The Mythster misconstrues candidacy eligibility (all the constitution says is that an eligible candidate cannot be kept from running on religious test grounds) vs. the Mythster suggesting that we impose upon the voting process itself.
Religion IS NOT a qualification or disqualification for public office; but it's certainly one quality of voter discernment among many others...namely, voting record, present position statements & rampant inconsistency of past position statements, social issues' stances, character, viability, scandal-free past, etc. Article VI, section 3 of the Constitution is aimed at the candidate (must be of a certain age and must have resided in our country for a certain number of years) and the government so that religion does not become a disqualification to keep somebody otherwise eligible for running for public office. Article VI, section 3, is not aimed at the voter. Otherwise, voters would have to 100% disregard character, beliefs, other-dimensionly commitments, and spiritual discernment in weighing candidates.
Has our Country ever had a Mormon President? If so, who? What was his track record?
Just ask Mitt to answer this one simple Yes or No question: Do you believe the Book of Mormon is true?
If Mitt says YES, then he is permanently damaged by all of the bigotry and obviously stupid anachronisms contained within that tome.
If Mitt says NO, then he is exposed as a long term serial liar.
Morgan joked that at least the couple’s Mormon faith eliminates the risk of scandal during their quest for the White House
______________________________________
“Morgan joked”
Morgan did a /s
According to Mitty’s “church” Mitty and his alleged one and only one wife are practicing prostitution ...
How scandalous is that ???
No joke
No /s
Ask Mitty’s “church”
Mitt Romney pushed back against the host’s questions about how his Mormon faith might influence his policy should he win the White House in 2012.
Asked whether it’s actually possible to separate his faith from his job as president should he be elected, Romney responded, “Absolutely. You don’t begin to apply doctrines of a religion to the responsibility of guiding a nation or guiding a state.”
___________________________________________________
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
So mitty wasdnt asked about his “church” and what his “church” taught or believed
He was asked about his own personal beliefs
and so he sidestepped the question and never did answer it...
I hope he is asked again sometime...
“I’m not a spokesman for my church.
_____________________________________________
well you are Mitty but right now I wont go there
You are though the only “spokesman” for your own beliefs...
He will need tele prompters to remember his “new” positions... I wonder if he thinks Gays can become gods ?
Romney’s Church should have nothing to do with it. Romney’s political stance should have everything to do with it. He is more liberal than McCain ... the media is pushing him for a reason, if he gets the nod, Obama’s back in just as with McCain. Romney’s religion should mean nothing, Romney’s RINO liberalism should mean everything.
Romney said. “If you want to learn about my church, talk to my church.”
________________________________________________
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
so the next time 2 of those 52,000 pimply faced 19 yo baby “elders” knock on my door proslytizing their mormon religion I’ll just say
“Willie Mitty said that if I wanted to learn more about your so called “church” I should talk to your so called “church”...
Now get off my porch because I call the sheriff...
Hey, does bishop Willie Mitty know you are doing this ???
He wont be pleased.”
OK