Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC's Lauer Claims Breitbart Breaking Weiner Story Violated Conservative Principles
NewsBusters ^ | 6-7-2011 | Kyle Drennen

Posted on 06/07/2011 9:16:53 AM PDT by smoothsailing

NBC's Lauer Claims Breitbart Breaking Weiner Story Violated Conservative Principles



Kyle Drennen

June 7, 2011

In an interview with Andrew Breitbart on Tuesday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer suggested the conservative blogger should not have broken news of the scandal involving Congressman Anthony Weiner: "Did you worry that – you know, as a conservative, you don't want government in people's bedrooms. And so did you stop and have a debate with yourself about that?"

Moments earlier, Breitbart had noted feeling some sympathy for Weiner during Monday's press conference: "I felt so unbelievably sad for this guy." Lauer responded by wondering why that sympathy didn't keep the BigGovernment.com creator from posting Weiner's racy tweet last week: "But if you're sad for the guy then, did you not consider that at some point you might be sad for him when you first posted that photo ten days ago?"

In response to Lauer's bizarre assertion that reporting on the scandal somehow went against conservative values, Breitbart explained: "I'm not the government. You know, he tweeted to, you know, 45,000 people that image. A person sent it to me. I can't think of a world in which that isn't news."

Later in the interview, Lauer was suspicious of a more graphic x-rated photo of Weiner that Breitbart had not released: "Is this, Andrew, some kind of x-rated insurance policy?...Because people have characterized it as something more." Breitbart replied: "I don't like to think of it that way."

Lauer pressed further, sparking this exchange:

LAUER: Under no circumstance will you release that? In other words, let's say Anthony Weiner supporters target you in some other way?

BREITBART: If Anthony Weiner decides to make this a jihad against me for his interpretation of putting me into this situation, you know what, I'll take that as a – you know, you said an insurance policy. Maybe. I can't foresee a circumstance in which I would release that. I don't think I want to put his family through that type of thing. But for instance, I've already started to hear words that Megan, the woman who came forth, people are prying through her private life. And they're-

LAUER: So would you use that photo to protect these women?

BREITBART: That's – you know, I'm not thinking of it that way, but I certainly have it in my possession. And I guarantee you he would use this against me and the people on the left side of the blogosphere would have used this against me. I could have put that out there and his career would have been over today.

In his final question to Breitbart, Lauer wondered: "Had you come into possession of photographs of a Republican congressman that were similar in nature to the photograph you received of Anthony Weiner, would you have been as quick to post that photograph?" Breitbart replied: "Yes....I'm repulsed when it's, when it's, you know, Larry Craig that's involved in these type of behaviors or Ensign, the Senator from Nevada....these guys put themselves in a blackmail-able situation."

Breitbart then added: "The problem is, is that there is the mainstream media. They've got the resources and they're usually there to cover it. My contention, it's my belief, is that there is a double standard in the media in how they treat Republicans and Democrats."

.................

Full transcript at LINK


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nbcnews; partisanmedia; weiner; weinergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
Photobucket

1 posted on 06/07/2011 9:16:55 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

What would a wazoo aperture like Lauer know about principles, let alone conservative ones?


2 posted on 06/07/2011 9:18:53 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It’s a darn good thing Breitbart got this information on Weiner before CHINA, RUSSIA, or IRAN not to mention lobbyists and assorted ME enemies did.

I suppose the idea that Weiner would have been subject to blackmail didn’t cross Lauer’s feeble mind.


3 posted on 06/07/2011 9:20:25 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"Did you worry that – you know, as a conservative, you don't want government in people's bedrooms." - Lauer

Is Breitbart the gov't? Where exactly did Breitbart call for gov't to get involved? Lauer's more than a bit confused, as usual.

4 posted on 06/07/2011 9:21:40 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

If Weiner had kept his namesake in his bedroom this would never have come to light, Matt.

And adultry is not a cherished conservative value.


5 posted on 06/07/2011 9:22:40 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

My thoughts exactly. Where the hell are these lib media types getting their logic? In the same few days we have Babs Walters comparing Palin’s bus trip to Weiner’s weiner — and now Lauer with this.

Herman Cain says “stupid people are ruining America.” Methinks he’s right.


6 posted on 06/07/2011 9:23:25 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
What would a wazoo aperture like Lauer know about principles, let alone conservative ones?

Only insofar as using said principles against conservatives.
Everyone else gets a free pass, as usual.

7 posted on 06/07/2011 9:24:19 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This all seems darn to close to “Have you stopped beating your wife?”


8 posted on 06/07/2011 9:25:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

NBC’s Lauer - an expert on conservative thought, et al


9 posted on 06/07/2011 9:25:44 AM PDT by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Lauer all too easily forgot poor old Eric Massa. As he was being driven from office he managed to get an interview with Glenn Beck.

The next day Tony Weiner appeared on Don Imus' show and said a number of things and mentioned that Massa "was one taco short of a happy meal".

I don't recall Matt criticizing Tony over that bit of invasion of the proverbial "bedroom", but there you have it.

10 posted on 06/07/2011 9:25:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Nice spin, Lauer!


11 posted on 06/07/2011 9:25:59 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Perverts need to be exposed


12 posted on 06/07/2011 9:26:07 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

If Lauer had a naked picture of Sarah Palin he would be having emissions down the front of his pants as he exposed it on national TV.

Who is this a-hole trying to fool ?

Lauer has no principles.


13 posted on 06/07/2011 9:26:23 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Sending uninvited pornography or soliciting sex from underage females over the internet is a felony.

I don’t think a warped and demented mind like Lauer’s can grasp that.


14 posted on 06/07/2011 9:26:50 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I’m amazed that Breitbart hasn’t brought up the fact that he could sue Weiner for defamation and has, so far, restrained himself from profiting at Weiner’s expense.


15 posted on 06/07/2011 9:27:37 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"Did you worry that – you know, as a conservative, you don't want government in people's bedrooms.

We don't want that, but we also don't want people's bedrooms in our government! And that is just what happened here, and with Clinton, and with...
16 posted on 06/07/2011 9:27:46 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The FIRST conservative principle should be TRUTH.

I doubt the truth would have ever been told had Breitbart not stepped forward to call BS on Weiner.


17 posted on 06/07/2011 9:27:48 AM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Alinsky tactics


18 posted on 06/07/2011 9:28:43 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

As if we didn’t know what this is all about. Lauer is just holding out hope of getting on Weiner’s sexting list.


19 posted on 06/07/2011 9:28:43 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Come up with a better political belief system, and I'll adopt it as my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I’m SICK of liberals telling us what and who we are... If Lauer wants to know who we are he can watch our actions.... That’s who we are...


20 posted on 06/07/2011 9:30:08 AM PDT by GOPJ (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act. - - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson