Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just one question for each Republican presidential candidate
St. Petersburg Times ^ | June 6, 2011 | David M. Shribman, Pittsburgh Post Gazette

Posted on 06/06/2011 5:50:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: svcw

Yes, indeed. She explained it THOROUGHLY. And she left her lt gov in charge as well, no discontinuity of leadership.

But, since the facts don’t fit the meme, the facts are ignored as if they didn’t exist.


21 posted on 06/06/2011 6:52:52 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Romney coming out with the blanket statement of support for the belief in anthropogenic global warming was his final coffin nail.

Conservatives, who have no need to boost their sense of self worth by “saving the erf” which doesn’t need saving,
know it’s a hoax with an agenda to curtail liberty,

and we’re having none of it.


22 posted on 06/06/2011 6:55:20 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Perry - In 500 words or less, explain why it is Conservative to issue an Executive Order mandating that all women between 13-21 in your state be immunized with Gardisil.

In fairness to Perry, he backed away from that when he was set straight. Can't say the same thing about the mob who shoved universal health care down our throats.

23 posted on 06/06/2011 6:57:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
To Herman Cain: "Since you endorsed Mitt Romney in 2008, calling him 'the best hope of a leader with substance, and the best hope for a good president who could turn out to be great', why are you opposing him now??"
24 posted on 06/06/2011 7:03:56 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Populism is antithetical to conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; PSYCHO-FREEP

Doesn’t even mention Herman Cain.

What are they going to do when he wins South Carolina? (He’ll place 2nd in IA and NH IMHO)


25 posted on 06/06/2011 7:15:06 AM PDT by RockinRight (Who is "Generic Republican" and why does he poll so much better against Obama than anyone else?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
...Gonzales v. Raich...

That one had me stumped. Why is some guy named Gonzales fighting that diminutive dolt?

26 posted on 06/06/2011 7:25:00 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The Sixteenth Amendment - a.k.a. - The Slavery Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Do you believe that the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and will you enforce it to the best of your ability, and seek to have it amended only where necessary?


27 posted on 06/06/2011 7:31:16 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
An excellent question. And I would imagine that any politician would say "Yes".

And so the follow-up would be: "How can you justify the EPA, Dept of Energy, Dept of Education, Homeland Security, FDA, HHS and other government bureaucracies which are not mentioned in the Constitution and for which no amendments have been put forth?"

28 posted on 06/06/2011 7:34:29 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
Why is some guy named Gonzales fighting that diminutive dolt?

You're thinking of Reich, I think (the Pit Yorkie).

29 posted on 06/06/2011 7:35:49 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I have one question for the author: Why do you say you’re going to ask one question, but instead splice together two questions in a run-on sentence?


30 posted on 06/06/2011 7:38:06 AM PDT by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

First class follow-up!


31 posted on 06/06/2011 7:38:58 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
The case was Gonzales v. Raich, not Gonzales v. Reich as stated in the original post, hence my confusion.

I immediately envisioned a prize fight between Gonzales and Reich.

32 posted on 06/06/2011 7:47:46 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The Sixteenth Amendment - a.k.a. - The Slavery Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk; Cincinatus' Wife; LucyT

More simple than that, ask if they’re attempting to uphold and defend the Constitution!

So far NOT one single has, and IF they are elected they perjury themselves the moment at the swearing in ceremony they put their hand on the bible with the other raise saying they will defend and uphold the Constitution, because they have NEVER, not one of them, spoken up about the crime perpetrated by the present p-Resident in the Whit-Hut!!

Instead they are ALL enabler of keeping this crime swept under the rug. I will not have a candidate to vote for in 2012, because then I become an enabler as well!!!

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=306953


33 posted on 06/06/2011 7:59:29 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I want to ask each one how they would get rid of the millions of illegal aliens and protect our borders.


34 posted on 06/06/2011 8:01:19 AM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

My question for all the candidates, of any party, no matter what office they may be running for:

Are you still part of the “we” in “”we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men...”?

If the answer is “no,” I have no further questions for the candidate. They are disqualified.

If their answer is “yes,” the follow-on is “what will you do within the lawful jurisdiction of your office to assure that every single person’s God-given, unalienable rights are protected, from the moment of their creation until natural death?”


If they get this right, they’ll get most things right.

If they get this wrong, you can’t trust them on anything.


35 posted on 06/06/2011 8:04:35 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

His Romney question was lame. Why not something related to the absence of military service by he and his family, or his endless flip flops, our banning assault rifles, or Romneycare?


36 posted on 06/06/2011 8:06:14 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
My question to every presidential candidate:

If you could make one change to the constitution what would it be?

37 posted on 06/06/2011 8:06:50 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Romney coming out with the blanket statement of support for the belief in anthropogenic global warming was his final coffin nail.

_________________________________________________

Dittos.

I used to be ambivalent about Romney, he would never be my choice in the primary but if he got nominated so what. After this statement I am now “anti” Romney. I am firmly in the camp of AABR (Almost Anybody But Romney).

What an idiot.

Anybody that still believes in man made global warming after the last 11 years of cooling must have rocks in his head.

I have always liked Palin. After her poor showing with Katie Couric I was disappointed but still liked her. The more I read about her the more I like her.

I think she has little chance of winning the nomination but that is who I will vote for.

38 posted on 06/06/2011 8:49:42 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Boxers or briefs?


39 posted on 06/06/2011 9:01:32 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
1992 presidential debate -- Pony-tailed man: ".... And I ask the three of you, how can we, as symbolically the children of the future president, expect the two of you, the three of you to meet our needs,...

He should have been laughed off the stage but here we are today fighting this mind-set.

40 posted on 06/06/2011 9:09:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson