Posted on 06/01/2011 4:48:05 PM PDT by Rational Thought
Someone posted an unfriendly sign on Sarah Palins tour bus earlier today. The villains message, pasted directly over the words, We the People on a picture of the Constitution, read, I, The Media Whore. Gawker has more:
[the sign] was sacrilegiously placed over a monster image of the preamble to the United States Constitution for nearly 15 minutes. The bus was parked outside Fox News headquarters.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Exactly! and the media can’t get enough of Sarah and they say she is being coy to them.
Meanwhile the media is angry Palin isn’t giving interviews.....
Great post and spot on!
If you really look into the truth of the matter, the male lib suffers from misogyny. The only acceptable role for a woman is doing a lap dance on their lap. Such things as hetrosexual love, matrimony and long term relationships are for those goofy rednecks who cling to their bibles and guns.
LOL -- excellent! I've actually seen that done, btw, 10 years ago on Salon's "TableTalk", by a conservative poster named Chad McClung who was driving all the liberals and gay ranters crazy calling, naming, and finally numbering their appeals to motive in lieu of argument and assorted logical solecisms as if he were Sammy Sosa holding batting practice. It was great.
Oh, and what did they do? They found a reference to something that gave them a link to his family homepage, and they sent his teenaged son a bunch of homosexual pornography. Then they baited him online, asking him if he knew his son was looking at gay porn, and did he know his son was gay.
Sorry, but in any ugliness contest, Helen Thomas is going to walk all over the competitor. She is the yokozuna of ugly.
Or maybe lard-based hair care products.
i bet one of the media workers defaced it
When some whacko goes over the cliff and tries to harm Sarah will the media take responsibility for their hate building rhetoric? After all the shooting of Mrs. Giffords was blamed partially on Sarah. Will there be legislation proposed by the congress? How about a few moments of silence at sporting events? I think not.
If that's indeed true, she needs to get some damned quick. With the media working endlessly to keep their brainwashed hordes in a lather, it's only a matter of time until some leftist whackjob finally jumps off the fence and attempts something violent.
Right on!
But then how crazy is this: if "their" "sex object/personal porn star" does a lap dance on someone else's lap, oh, boy, there's hell to pay when "their" "little slut" acts like, well, a slut.
Or, for the pathetically duped and cognitively dissonate Lib women, when their husband, who, as in the case of Ahnold, was actually big-time in the Hollywood business of promoting slutty lifestyles as best they possibly could, actually lives like a --- oops! --- at LEAST an "R-rated" movie, THAT IS WHOLLY PERSONALLY UNACCEPTABLE.
It's pretty stupid, for example, to spew movie after movie glorifying adultery, sluttiness, promiscuity, shacking up and perversion -- and then go crying to the public about how you and your family were victimized by your spouse's pig-like sexual behavior.
As usual, the "rules" are for the other guy. Libs can, in their mind, promote perversion all they want because, until it smacks them in the head, they live in the la-la land that THEIR spouse won't ever treat them like crap and if he/she did, it WOULDN'T HURT. Except, um, it does hurt. Surprise.
Libs have no clue that the only reason their personal sluttiness doesn't cause them more personal pain is because, at the moment, they are still enjoying the residual benefits of general societal restraints on sexual pig-like behavior that are a result of the moral code held by the masses they disdain.
But once Libs succeed in breaking that general moral code -- so that the MAJORITY of society acts like LIBERALS --- being a slutty Lib won't be so cute anymore. It will have consequences they can't even imagine today, while they still are getting an adolescent kick out of rebelling against Judeo-Christian values. If the day comes that there are no Judeo-Christian values to rebel against, Libs are going to have a very rude awakening as to how little personal security, not to mention personal worth, one has in a society where people do not exercise self-restraint.
Libs want to -- and work very hard and persistently to -- pornify everything related to sex, and especially (as you note) related to WOMEN, and then turn around and use everything related to sex and their view of WOMEN as their vocabulary for what's dirty, cheap, awful, degrading and socially pathologicaly and nauseous.
Don't get me started. (Rhetorical comment, obviously).
Aw, c'mon, tell us what you really think.
As a clue to their dualistic behavior, abortion comes to mind. In fact it is a key window into their narcissistic world where women are sex objects and are given no choice but to abort. It sort of reminds me of the Muslin male and their harem psychology. There must be a sexual connection between the Left and Islam. Something to explore.
Well, chime in as time and inclination permits, here and I’m sure it will come up in future threads. Your observations are very astute and helpful to the discussion.
On the abortion point, EXACTLY. Look at Libs running around so p***ed off and bitter that sex leads to pregnancy. I mean, Who came up with that design failure, you know what I’m saying?
heh-heh
(And I’m still going at it today as we speak! lol It’s a good day in Freeperland.)
God forbid that ever happen. But if it did, every talking head and anchor on television and every newspaper editor around the country should pay for it.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.