Maybe with a few more patriotic heroes like this we can get America back to its founding Christian roots, and stop the atheistic liberal fascist takeover
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Ira_Louvin
There is hope.
God bless Laci.
To: Ira_Louvin
The school didn’t endorse it. So what is the ACLU’s problem?
Declare war on the ACLU because they have declared war on our nation.
3 posted on
05/21/2011 2:25:52 PM PDT by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: Ira_Louvin
I guessing Laci won’t be getting the 2011 ‘Kennedy’s Profile in Courage’ award.
4 posted on
05/21/2011 2:26:07 PM PDT by
AU72
To: Ira_Louvin
Civil disobedience is the best way to deal with stupid superintendents, judges and activist lawyers.
5 posted on
05/21/2011 2:26:46 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(We're flat broke, but he thinks these solar shingles and really fast trains will magically save us.)
To: Ira_Louvin
Senior Laci Rae Mattice made a GUTSY move!
6 posted on
05/21/2011 2:28:13 PM PDT by
Ken522
To: Ira_Louvin
> “The First Amendment prohibition on government
> endorsement of religion exists to protect the minority
> from the majority,” said Marjorie R. Esman,
Let’s have a look at the first amendment.
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Looks like the first amendment was written to protect religion from the government, as well as from communist ACLU guttersnipes.
7 posted on
05/21/2011 2:28:19 PM PDT by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: Ira_Louvin
Civil disobedience during the Clinton years was patriotic. Civil disobedience during Obama is terrorism.
8 posted on
05/21/2011 2:29:19 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice)
To: Ira_Louvin
9 posted on
05/21/2011 2:30:32 PM PDT by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: Ira_Louvin
12 posted on
05/21/2011 2:33:33 PM PDT by
ladyvet
( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
To: Ira_Louvin
Far more actual Americans need to stand up like this and show some guts!!!
To: Ira_Louvin
You gotta wonder what the ACLU's definition of "freedom" is, and whether they approve of freedom in any form.
15 posted on
05/21/2011 2:47:49 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
To: Ira_Louvin
She has as much right to make her statement as the God hating atheist POS who called the ACLU.
I have NO respect for one person who thinks they can make others crawl for them because they call the ACLU.
They can kiss where the sun don’t shine.
16 posted on
05/21/2011 2:48:35 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: Ira_Louvin
To: Ira_Louvin
The prohibition of religion is NOT freedom of religion!
To: Ira_Louvin
It was unclear if the prayer would result in any legal action. AND WHAT IF IT DOES? So what! Let the ACLU sue. The school district should not even bother to answer it or spend a single dime. Let them get a default judgment. what will the court do? How will it get the money? Not a single public official would dare to life a finger to help. THIS IS WHAT EVERY SINGLE SCHOOL MUST DO - JUST IGNORE THE ACLU SUITS AND THEY WILL GO AWAY. PERIOD.
19 posted on
05/21/2011 2:57:58 PM PDT by
montag813
(SECURE THE DAMN BORDER! http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
To: Ira_Louvin
I was hoping that as part of her remarks, Laci told the ACLU to stuff it, but I guess that isn't very Christian of me.
22 posted on
05/21/2011 3:10:41 PM PDT by
mojito
To: Ira_Louvin
The First Amendment prohibition on government endorsement of religion exists to protect the minority from the majority, Dumb lawyer forgot about the part forbidding the gov't from the FREE exercise of religion.
24 posted on
05/21/2011 3:12:09 PM PDT by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: Ira_Louvin
"The First Amendment prohibition on government endorsement of religion exists to protect the minority from the majority,"
First of all, it's not "prohibition on government endorsement of religion", it's prohibition on government endorsing a particular Church (separation of church and state). Even more, the amendment says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...."
Secondly, for Pete's sakes, was a minority in any danger, when majority prayed to bless them all?!
25 posted on
05/21/2011 3:15:45 PM PDT by
alecqss
To: Ira_Louvin
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, answered and said to the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter.
If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king.
But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
27 posted on
05/21/2011 3:17:57 PM PDT by
Rodm
To: Ira_Louvin
Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof
It's pretty stinking clear to me what they had in mind with this amendment. I don't know why lawyers, judges, and ACLU commie USA haters have any wiggle room around it.
29 posted on
05/21/2011 3:26:02 PM PDT by
Tailback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson