Posted on 05/01/2011 3:35:44 AM PDT by grundle
Expert says lack of "chromatic aberration" means Obama BC is computer generated, not photocopy
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
ping
I think Obama & his friends put a really botched up, pathetic “long form” certificate out there to keep this story going.
So the Constitution says the Pres. has to be born in the US but does not provide the means or requirement to verify. It is up to we the people to put in place those guidelines for future candidates.
Lesson learned and let’s move on.
Chromatic aberration indeed!
The coverup is always worse than the original crime.
Other formsMost hospitals in the U.S. issue a souvenir birth certificate which typically includes the footprints of the newborn. However, these birth certificates are not legally accepted as proof of age or citizenship, and are frequently rejected by the Bureau of Consular Affairs during passport applications. Many Americans believe the souvenir records to be their official birth certificates, when in reality they hold little legal value.[25]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_certificate
I didn’t know that. I really thought that the original BCs had the footprints.
I shall now stop posting that pic.
Thank you for the info. :0)
LOL!!! There ya go!
I also want to know how their marriage was even considered "real".
Would also like some DNA on daddy's side.
Based on Obama's father being a non citizen, I do not believe Obama is/was eligible.
The standard would have been the highest possible....Both parents to be American citizens!!!
I just know my kids’ birth certificates didn’t have their footprints but something (some little form) from the hospital did.
I appreciate your post. I’d rather be accurate than propagandist. (Well, sometimes I like being propagandist, but not with this topic. It depends on how much I want to tweak the libs.) This topic requires integrity given all the controversy. I really thought the footprints meant something.
It’s feedback like yours that keeps Free Republic honest.
Good job! :0)
Thus far in this, we have heard little if anything from the State of Hawaii. Their silence in all of this, is deafening.
There is NO official seal on this “document”.
WHO, is Alvin P. Onaka, Phd., the State Registrar ? Is there such an individual, and was he present when this item was “scanned” ?
Has anyone done a search pertaining to the number of conflicting news stories relative to this BC ?
I can recall, that the current Gov. of Hawaii wanted to “get to the bottom” of this controversy. This announcemnet was followed by numerous stories which said that the BC did or did not exist, could not be found, had been seen, could not be released etc., etc.
The BC we have seen MAY be legit, but the lies, distortions and cover-ups attending this controversy is truly concerning. AND, something which WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TOLERATED under a previous administration.
I’ve been called out on a couple of posts when I assumed something. I, like you, want the truth. Of course, I am not above engaging in a little propaganda with libs just to make them crazy. LOL
Hee hee hee! ;0)
The video was great. The guy did an excellent job. Made it easy to understand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.