Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ATLAS SHRUGGED- Freeper Reviews
Freepers | April 15, 2011 | RobFromGa

Posted on 04/15/2011 1:31:44 PM PDT by RobFromGa

Atlas Shrugged Part 1 Quick Review- 5 stars!

Very faithful to Rand's ideas. I didn't feel like they skipped any major items... the back story with Francisco was hinted at and would have been too hard to develop completely.

Casting was superb. Hank (Hooray!) and Lillian (Boo!)Rearden and Ellis Wyatt (!!!) were done perfectly as was Wesley Mouch and the other moochers and looters. Dagny was good but it took about ten minutes for me to completely buy her in the role.

Pace was perfect... it kept moving at a fast speed, and I didn't want it to end.

Cinematography very good- hard to believe only cost about $5 million! The Rearden Metal bridge was great, as was the Colorado landscape shots...

Audience Reaction: Duluth, GA 12:25pm showing was about 80% full (there was noon showing in a larger theater already going) & audience reacted with enthusiasm throughout and Applause at end.

Can't wait for Part 2! I will be going back to see Part One more than once...

Minor nitpick- shouldn't have had the date 2016 on the movie, it is timeless.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged; aynrand; movie; review
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-329 next last
To: RobFromGa; All
Worth watching: Atlas Shrugged Audience Reactions
261 posted on 04/16/2011 5:20:22 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I liked, but not loved, the movie. It was like a veneer of wood instead of a real piece of solid wood furniture or the original tree. Maybe if was a 3½ hour Peter Jackson epic instead of 100 minutes it could have dug into backstory and internal monologues which were so important to the book. Too many characters just kind of popped up said their lines and left scene without really showing why they were either the good guys or the bad guys.

They handled making trains the primary long distance transportation for the movie. $30+ per gallon for gas? Yikes. I'll give a hug to the gas station owner the next time I shell out less than $4.

I really hope it does well enough to get parts 2 and 3 made. I'll definitely buy the DVD when it comes out. I don't know if I'll see it in the theater again.

I did have a couple of problems with suspected continuity errors (no rewind at the theater to double check :-( ) and one error of train routing. (minor spoilers ahead, page down to skip it if you don't want to see them)

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

1. The early shot of the the Rio Norte line had the same scenery (it looked like autumn) as the July (?) run of the John Galt Line. OK, they didn't have the budget to film it twice. If that was CGI, then budget isn't an excuse.

2. Even after Dagny left Taggart Transcontinental she still appears to have the same office. She moved, therefore shouldn't have the same office. (Also she didn't want to take Eddie with her - she wanted him to stay as VP of Operations at Taggert to be her placeholder while she kept running it too).

3. To quote the book "One red streak twisted its way from Cheyenne, Wyoming, down to El Paso, Texas—the Rio Norte Line of Taggart Transcontinental". The movie's map had the Rio Norte running from the east (Nebraska? Kansas? Missouri?) into Colorado.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

But them I'm the guy friends hate to watch movies with because I'll snarl "You .... cant't .... carbon.... date.... gold" during a movie (both Timecop and Stargate made that same mistake within a few weeks of each other) and keep hitting rewind when I see a mistake on a DVD.

262 posted on 04/16/2011 6:07:06 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Saw it last night (4/15) outside of Philly. Theater was sold out and the movie finished to thunderous applause in the theater.

I really enjoyed this movie, as did my wife (who has not read the novel, btw).

We came with low expectations given the reviews, but left quite satisfied. My wife is particularly excited for Part 2.

The dialog is a bit weak at time, but I find most movies have weak dialog anymore - good writing is hard to find. The acting was ok in spots (John Galt, James Taggart, Dagney Taggart during the first third), and great in others (Lillian Reardon and Ellis Wyatt especially).

I definitely would recommend this to folks beyond the objectivist message. It is an good story and a good movie.


263 posted on 04/16/2011 6:12:33 PM PDT by GodBlessAmericaKD (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The Wisconson scenes weren’t shot in WI either, looked more like WY, or somewhere similar.


264 posted on 04/16/2011 6:16:24 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I can't give it five, or even four stars as a movie... I love it that I can go to the theater and see it, though... and see it with like-minded folks... but some of the killer scenes in the book were left out and that disappointed me: Review: Atlas Shrugged Part I
265 posted on 04/16/2011 6:42:35 PM PDT by Bryher1 (http://nhs77.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r-q-tek86

Some of Rand’s writing about Hank and Dagny’s love affair was creepy... I know she was, perhaps, trying to create a metaphor about ownership and service and money... but it just came out as creepy and rough.

A lot of the politics Rand wrote about have come to pass — thankfully, society is a bit more forgiving about personal lives than in the book.


266 posted on 04/16/2011 6:47:47 PM PDT by Bryher1 (http://nhs77.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessAmericaKD

Regarding future movies.... of all the scenes in the book I’m looking forward to, the one where Hank Rearden goes before a pseudo congress to answer for his crimes is the one I want to see the most.

I always have high hopes that a witness will stand up and blow congressional questioners out of the water with a great speech... I was hoping Barry Bonds or Mark Mcqwire or Roger Clemens would stand up and say, “WHO THE HELL DO YOU PEOPLE THINK YOU ARE!!” but it was not to be.


267 posted on 04/16/2011 6:53:34 PM PDT by Bryher1 (http://nhs77.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter; All
I have always found this to be a fun exercise; to cast "Atlas Shrugged". Now it has been done, and I think they did the right thing casting it with non-superstars. But I have always thought over the years, that the following people would have been great:

Jodie Foster as Dagny Taggart:

Liam Neeson as Hank Reardon:

Antonio Banderas as Francisco D'Anconia:

Jurgen Prochnow as Ragnar Danneskjöld:

Daniel Day Lewis as Ellis Wyatt:

The guy who was the administrator on the comedy show "Scrubs" (I don't even know his name!) as James Taggart:

268 posted on 04/16/2011 7:12:22 PM PDT by rlmorel (Capitalism is the Goose that lays The Golden Egg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci

Awww, only 15 people, that’s a shame!! Thanks for the review, can’t say I disagree. About the drinking, I was thinking it was kind of showing the decadence and debauchery a little, like something out of a Fitzgerald novel in the 1920’s... Well, some just party and drink while others keep working?

Three out of four railroad spikes, I love it.


269 posted on 04/16/2011 7:46:32 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: r-q-tek86

“push through the first 100 pages”

In fact, the maiden run of the John Gault Line is a fine piece of writing, full of excitement and longing and wonder.


270 posted on 04/16/2011 8:00:53 PM PDT by Bryher1 (http://nhs77.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
The scene where Lillian taps Hank on the shoulder and says, "All done?" as he rolls off her got a HUGE laugh at my screening.

RE: Paul Larkin. He is a foe who is posing as a friend. A good portion of the dialogue from that scene is taken word for word from the book. Larkin's scene provides a lot of useful information regarding "who you can trust in Washington," and he also delivers the lines that explain the meaning of the Galt phrase. ("Why ask useless questions? Why is the sky blue? Who is John Galt?") Larkin is a two-faced villain. I thought it was a nice bit of editing that they cut from the dinner at the Rearden household directly to the "boys club" setting consisting of Mouch, Boyle, James Taggart aaaand Paul Larkin. The hardest he fights for his "friend" Rearden is to request that he "not be hurt too much" in their next plan. Of course, a few scenes later, we see Rearden being forced to sign over ownership of his ore mines to Paul Larkin.

271 posted on 04/16/2011 8:05:18 PM PDT by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

LOL. So I was I ! Same row, but about 5 seats away from the restive tyke.


272 posted on 04/16/2011 9:39:07 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
It is fine today, but what about in 2016 or 2017 or 2030?

By then, it will be on the History Channel as a documentary.

273 posted on 04/16/2011 11:22:01 PM PDT by Erasmus (I love "The Raven," but then what do I know? I'm just a poetaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

BTTT


274 posted on 04/17/2011 4:33:48 AM PDT by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is... tell your storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

I loved the movie. It’s minor quirkiness added to the overall affect and impact. It will reach a lot of new people and sell a lot of books too. Coming out now seems like providence to me. All the things my heart would add would really just make it ponderous, and the way it was done is instead sleek and appealing. Ironic that Hollywood refusing to do this for so long exactly mirrors the villains in the movie. The movie is fun & true to the heart of the book. Very well done, and I will see it again.


275 posted on 04/17/2011 10:36:35 AM PDT by wizard61 (Hack the Narrative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

OK if we want to nit pick.

In the book, the motor runs off static electricty in the atmosphere. In the movie, I believe they said it creates static electricity from atmospheric pressure.

I don’t know how the movie is ever going to get the motor to work if they don’t understand the technology any better than that.


276 posted on 04/17/2011 10:58:25 AM PDT by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I love your casting of the movie. I agree, they would all have been great.


277 posted on 04/17/2011 11:06:00 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
I agree with most of your cast, with the exception of Jodie Foster. The reason being that, as I recall from the book, Dagny Taggart was a brunette. And that's the only quibble I had with Taylor Schilling.

So, I think Angie Harmon would have been a better fit for the role.

278 posted on 04/17/2011 12:37:02 PM PDT by raisetheroof ("To become Red is to become dead --- gradually." Alexander Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

It is kind of a fun exercise. There were two characters (I have not seen the movie yet) that I disagree with: One is James Taggart, he is too young and slick looking, and the other is Ellis Wyatt. That guy they casted doesn’t look anything like the book’s description, but...I can live with that...:)


279 posted on 04/17/2011 1:34:00 PM PDT by rlmorel (Capitalism is the Goose that lays The Golden Egg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

It is kind of a fun exercise. There were two characters (I have not seen the movie yet) that I disagree with: One is James Taggart, he is too young and slick looking, and the other is Ellis Wyatt. That guy they casted doesn’t look anything like the book’s description, but...I can live with that...:)


280 posted on 04/17/2011 1:34:00 PM PDT by rlmorel (Capitalism is the Goose that lays The Golden Egg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-329 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson