Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama's America: Chicago School Bans Bag Lunches to Protect Kids from Themselves
Newsbusters ^

Posted on 04/11/2011 8:45:25 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Michelle Obama's America: Chicago School Bans Bag Lunches to Protect Kids from Themselves By Tim Graham Created 04/11/2011 - 10:32am

The Chicago Tribune reported Monday that one Chicago public school -- the Little Village Academy -- has banned bag lunches...to protect the kids from their own "unhealthful" food choices:

Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.

"Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school," Carmona said. "It's about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It's milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception."

Carmona said she created the policy six years ago after watching students bring "bottles of soda and flaming hot chips" on field trips for their lunch. Although she would not name any other schools that employ such practices, she said it was fairly common.

A Chicago Public Schools spokeswoman said she could not say how many schools prohibit packed lunches and that decision is left to the judgment of the principals.

"While there is no formal policy, principals use common sense judgment based on their individual school environments," Monique Bond wrote in an email. "In this case, this principal is encouraging the healthier choices and attempting to make an impact that extends beyond the classroom."\

But reporters Monica Eng and Joel Hood suggest there are other reasons than a nutrition crusade: "Any school that bans homemade lunches also puts more money in the pockets of the district's food provider, Chartwells-Thompson. The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced-price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch." But if they're really concerned about a learning environment, what if the kids don't eat?

At Little Village, most students must take the meals served in the cafeteria or go hungry or both. During a recent visit to the school, dozens of students took the lunch but threw most of it in the garbage uneaten. Though CPS has improved the nutritional quality of its meals this year, it also has seen a drop-off in meal participation among students, many of whom say the food tastes bad.

"Some of the kids don't like the food they give at our school for lunch or breakfast," said Little Village parent Erica Martinez. "So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so they could at least eat something."

"(My grandson) is really picky about what he eats," said Anna Torrez, who was picking up the boy from school. "I think they should be able to bring their lunch. Other schools let them. But at this school, they don't."

But parent Miguel Medina said he thinks the "no home lunch policy" is a good one. "The school food is very healthy," he said, "and when they bring the food from home, there is no control over the food."

At Claremont Academy Elementary School on the South Side, officials allow packed lunches but confiscate any snacks loaded with sugar or salt. (They often are returned after school.) Principal Rebecca Stinson said that though students may not like it, she has yet to hear a parent complain.

"The kids may have money or earn money and (buy junk food) without their parents' knowledge," Stinson said, adding that most parents expect that the school will look out for their children.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: liberalfascism; obesity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Nanny statists......
1 posted on 04/11/2011 8:45:29 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
it also has seen a drop-off in meal participation among students,

Can't have that now can we. That'd shut the Federal money spigot down. This doesn't have jack to do with feeding the little buggers nutritious food. It has to do with the amount of Federal dollars tied to that stupid school lunch program.

2 posted on 04/11/2011 8:47:58 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Don’t have kids yet, but I will be homeschooling when I do.

This nation’s education system is out of control.


3 posted on 04/11/2011 8:48:30 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Can’t be nutritious if the kids don’t eat it.


4 posted on 04/11/2011 8:52:49 AM PDT by ebersole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Captive audiance ! Don’t want to deny the school cafeteria monopoly from student’s money !

This reminds me when I worked at LM (DoD contractor) in Denver SW. We had an outside company do food service and part of the contract was no one was allowed to bring in microwaves or refrigerators. There was also no nearby place to go out and eat either.


5 posted on 04/11/2011 8:53:29 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
most parents expect that the school will look out for their children.

Says it all....
6 posted on 04/11/2011 8:54:39 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I would say 80% control freak nanny state.
20% protect the sweetheart deal with the cafeteria contractor. It is Chicago, donchaknow. Obama’s crony capitalism (read facism, and has nothing to do with real capitalism) strikes again.


7 posted on 04/11/2011 8:55:38 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (All Hail the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Get all the kids on free lunch. Make them dependent on the government as early as possible.
8 posted on 04/11/2011 8:56:57 AM PDT by ryan71 (Dear spell check - No, I will not capitalize the "m" in moslem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Keep in mind, this is NOT about the kids choosing the
kind of food to eat, it’s about the PARENTS choosing
what the kids eat.

Teach the kids, feed the kids, what’s next?
House the kids? Why have parents at all?
They just inculcate bad habits into these
young citizens. /s


9 posted on 04/11/2011 8:59:58 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Mama Wookie Wide Load is getting Nazi on us.


10 posted on 04/11/2011 9:00:34 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Click The Pic

11 posted on 04/11/2011 9:00:47 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FreeRepublic. Now, More Than Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

it’s sure a racket isn’t it? less bag lunches - more noney in federal coffers.


12 posted on 04/11/2011 9:01:43 AM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT (I am keeping the faith, I have not finished my course and I am fighting for the good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

That is exactly what this is about.....has nothing to do with nutrition of bag lunches.

Also, you cannot tell a parent that their child has to eat school food...

Who is going to file a lawsuit to stop this crap?


13 posted on 04/11/2011 9:02:29 AM PDT by neverbluffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How about banning Democrats and Liberals from running for office to protect the taxpayer from “unhealthy political choices”?


14 posted on 04/11/2011 9:04:00 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, but you should see what the kids at The Village People Academy bring for lunch.


15 posted on 04/11/2011 9:06:50 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Follow the money. Bottom line.

Colonel, USAFR


16 posted on 04/11/2011 9:07:10 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

later


17 posted on 04/11/2011 9:07:20 AM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
But parent Miguel Medina said he thinks the "no home lunch policy" is a good one. "The school food is very healthy," he said, "and when they bring the food from home, there is no control over the food."

Miguel, nobody was forcing you to send your kids to school with a lunch. And the control over the diet comes from *the parents*

18 posted on 04/11/2011 9:07:32 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

NEWS ALERT! Early this morning several Burger King employees were taken hostage by Michelle Obama after they refused to give her 5 Double Whoppers with cheese and extra fries.The TANK SIZED FRST LADY attempted to tell the employees that a healthy diet only pertains to the little people. Negotiators are attempting to lure her out with MickyDs Big Macs and fries. She has demanded 10 Big Macs, 10 apple pies and a coke to go. We have attempted to reach the President but he is on the golf course and unavailable for comment. More news and the outcome of this disturbing scene at 11:oo.


19 posted on 04/11/2011 9:11:07 AM PDT by mardi59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"and when they bring the food from home, there is no control over the food."

Money Quote. Useful idiots are ever so helpful.

20 posted on 04/11/2011 9:11:12 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson