1 posted on
03/30/2011 5:31:34 AM PDT by
Roberts
To: Roberts
Sex-retary.
BTW....I did a quick web search and found some PG rated evidence. She's guilty.
2 posted on
03/30/2011 5:37:26 AM PDT by
edpc
(Tagline under construction: Your American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars at work.)
To: Roberts
This article would be much better if pictures accompanied it... Anyway, the 14 year old kid must have watched alot of porn to find that little gem...
3 posted on
03/30/2011 5:37:38 AM PDT by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: Roberts
Not guilty.
4 posted on
03/30/2011 5:37:49 AM PDT by
library user
(Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
To: Roberts
In all seriousness what is the formal reason the lad is suspended ?
5 posted on
03/30/2011 5:37:58 AM PDT by
wonkowasright
(Wonko from outside the asylum)
To: Roberts
Certainly aint Doody Goodman in Grease:
6 posted on
03/30/2011 5:38:03 AM PDT by
capydick
(''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
To: Roberts
7 posted on
03/30/2011 5:38:32 AM PDT by
caveat emptor
(zippety doo dah)
To: Roberts
GUILTY ...
I bet she could take a lump of sugar out of my hand ... or a carrot
10 posted on
03/30/2011 5:43:42 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: Roberts
Okay, I’ll say it. Does anyone think her face looks kind of manly? When I see that in this day and age of plastic surgery it always makes me wonder...
To: Roberts
While officials acknowledge Ardente hadn’t done anything illegal, the board said her cinematic activities don’t correspond with the values being taught at the school Doubtful.
To: Roberts
IMO creating a fake facebook page in someones name and posting racy pics of them without permission is a suspendable offense. The kid is a jerk.
18 posted on
03/30/2011 5:51:24 AM PDT by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: Roberts
"14-year-old alleged..." "after authorities learned a student had spotted her in the porn video Serial Abusers 2." "the board said her cinematic activities don’t correspond with the values being taught at the school,"
hmmmm, case of the missing parent...magritte
29 posted on
03/30/2011 6:13:36 AM PDT by
magritte
("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
To: Roberts
Why are people who work in porn always referred to as porn STARS? Really?
What about porn extra? Porn character actor? Porn actor?
It's always STAR, like they're instantly recognizable and get Oscars or something.
40 posted on
03/30/2011 6:51:09 AM PDT by
Lizavetta
(You get what you tolerate)
To: Roberts
45 posts and no one has questioned why a 14-year old kid is in possession of porn video...in school...and asking her for an autograph.
14.
46 posted on
03/30/2011 7:21:45 AM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Islam is a violent and tyrannical political ideology and has nothing to do with "religion".)
To: Roberts
Although I’d like to joke about her having a butter face, instead I’ll focus on the kid. Why would he be in trouble? The girl is the one with the questionable job. Isn’t there any kind of morals clause in their work force?
47 posted on
03/30/2011 7:38:06 AM PDT by
WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
("Elections have consequences...." Barry O. Thank you Scott Walker and WI Republicans!!)
To: Roberts
That’s the problem with our Western civilization. “Is she hot?” and “Will she do it?” Not “Will she be a good wife and mother?”
48 posted on
03/30/2011 8:22:38 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Roberts
asked him to keep quiet about the matter. She should be fired.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson