Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex outside marriage should be illegal, says Parnell nominee
Anchorage Daily News ^ | 3/24/11 | Richard Mauer

Posted on 03/28/2011 5:40:36 PM PDT by LonelyCon

Gov. Sean Parnell's appointee for the panel that nominates state judges testified Wednesday that he would like to see Alaskans prosecuted for having sex outside of marriage.

The candidate, Don Haase of Valdez, also admitted under questioning by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that his official resume failed to disclose his leadership role in Eagle Forum Alaska, which advocates for social conservative issues. He most recently was president of the organization, but resigned when he learned of his nomination, he said.

[Snip]

Paskvan: "Do you believe [adultery] should be a crime?"

Haase: "Yeah, I think it's very harmful to have extramarital affairs. It's harmful to children, it's harmful to the spouse who entered a legally binding agreement to marry the person that's cheating on them."

Paskvan: "What about premarital affairs -- should that be a crime?"

Haase: "I think that would be up to the voters certainly. If it came before (the state) as a vote, I probably would vote for it ... I can see where it would be a matter for the state to be involved with because of the spread of disease and the likelihood that it would cause violence. I can see legitimate reasons to push that as a crime."

Haase then asked why those questions were relevant.

"You are injecting yourself into the judicial system and so I think it's fair inquiry," Paskvan replied. "If you have a motivation to limit who would be advanced to a judgeship ... then your beliefs and attitudes are important," Paskvan said.

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: adultery; alaska; moralabsolutes; parnell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: nagdt

Post of the day! ROTFL


41 posted on 03/28/2011 6:13:32 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

The party that wants to control my c**k is no better than the party that wants to control my wallet.


42 posted on 03/28/2011 6:15:53 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

“So, let’s invite the government into everyone’s bedroom and private life, and see how much they can regulate. It’s for the public good, dontchaknow?”

The govt already controls every aspect of our lives. They define what constitutes a bedroom, and every aspect of that room and its contents. Heck they have half the population afraid to take those stupid tags off their pillows.


43 posted on 03/28/2011 6:16:02 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

“If you’re a Christian, sex before marriage is a sin.”

Its a sin if you’re not a Christian as well.


44 posted on 03/28/2011 6:17:41 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Some states could choose to regulate toward stable families and some states could choose to regulate toward non-stop bacchanal.

Utter foolishness. What did Utah have to do to join the union? It had to outlaw polygamy.

Look, our natural rights derive from the Our Creator and his establishment of the Laws of Nature. While States are sovereign, a State that makes laws contrary to God's laws is rogue.

In a way the Civil War was about that theme. Chattel Slavery is immoral, immoral by G-d's Law. It was Christians who most opposed it in the US -- Quakers and religiously motivated individuals, including the both the most gentle of persons and the most forceful -- the meek to the bloody firebrands like John Brown.

Could a nation -- the North -- allow an slave nation to split off from it? The answer: no. That would have been immoral.

45 posted on 03/28/2011 6:17:49 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DTogo; Mariner; driftdiver
And didn't Jesus stop the stoning of an adulteress?

That isn't what that story is about. It's about hypocrites.

The law was that both the man and the woman were to be brought for judgment. There also had to be an eyewitness. If you falsely accused someone, you received the punishment you sought for them, stoning. Hence Jesus saying "He who is without sin cast the first stone". They broke the law. It was a set up to trap Jesus (where was the dude and was he a Pharisee?). He knew the law. So did they.

46 posted on 03/28/2011 6:19:06 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Even worse - according to an archaic Virginia statute, I'm a bigamist several times over.

I wonder if any of my wives know........

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

47 posted on 03/28/2011 6:19:39 PM PDT by Viking2002 (RELEASE THE KRAKEN!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Back when I was in the USMC, adultery was a court martial offense according to the UCMJ. Was it prosecuted? Not much. Should it have been?

Yep.


48 posted on 03/28/2011 6:20:45 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("All it takes for Evil to triumph is for good MEN to do nothing." Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Some forms of sex are always wrong, others made right by contract. I’d like to see the law allow polygamy, contracted consorts and prostitution. But better to outlaw them, and discretion and privacy be their shield when necessary, than to allow and tolerate in law a general sexual licentiousness.


49 posted on 03/28/2011 6:21:17 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: katana

Radical libertines and Hedonists have desperately tried to re-write Puritan History and resorted to basically lying about them in an attempt to say “everyone always acted like we do.” It wasn’t just limited to the Puritans either, look at how Margaret Mead lied about the Samoans. It’s a shame that you bought the communist propaganda.


50 posted on 03/28/2011 6:24:57 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Even if rarely prosecuted — the laws against bastardy being an example of laws that seem to have had only a handful of prosecutions over a few hundred years — the mere fact that they are illegal establishes a clear warning to all that such things are close to unacceptable in a functioning society.


51 posted on 03/28/2011 6:24:57 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Please look up the word "reputedly" and note that my degree in History trumps your belief that the Puritans were, well, "pure". And if you want to live under the watchful eye of a private morality police force you should have no trouble finding a nice condo in Riyadh.

Creating laws against immoral behavior among free people have a rather less than successful history, but if you feel it's a good idea to offer folks the choice between jail time and an abortion, so be it.

52 posted on 03/28/2011 6:25:15 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yes.


53 posted on 03/28/2011 6:25:50 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"Utter foolishness. What did Utah have to do to join the union? It had to outlaw polygamy."

I'd rather have a discussion free from personal attack.

That said, the Utah Admission was a political event. There were no Federal Laws against polygamy...and there should not be. Ever.

If Utah or any other State decides they want to institutionalize polygamy they are free to do so.

Whether you like it or not, and I suspect you don't, we live in a Federal Republic where the Feds have no legal authority over the sexual behavior of it's citizens.

54 posted on 03/28/2011 6:25:50 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: philetus

No kidding, this one is off the plantation of free will.


55 posted on 03/28/2011 6:26:27 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nagdt
World’s best birth control method = Wedding cake.

Or a kid or two.............................

56 posted on 03/28/2011 6:27:28 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I knew what I was feeling, but what was I thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
Another thing, people like this are usually caught with their pants down
doing what they advocate against.
57 posted on 03/28/2011 6:28:54 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: katana

You could have 99 degrees in History and you’d still be wrong. That’s obvious. You have too low a reading comprehension to be much of a scholar.

Your illiterate and distempered bragging mocks all who do know History and cherish its lessons, btw.


58 posted on 03/28/2011 6:28:54 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: katana

Your “degree in History” (which you need to prove if you are going to assert it) is pretty much worthless if you were simply taught the historic revisionism that is referred to as “history” in contemporary society. Indeed, the outright fraud (Margaret Mead is but one example) that exists with the academic left pretty much throws out any fallacious appeal to authority that you might purport to advance here.


59 posted on 03/28/2011 6:29:08 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
"Yes"

Well sir, then you and I are mortal enemies.

60 posted on 03/28/2011 6:30:17 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson