Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.E. Paid No U.S. Taxes in 2010
Weekly Standard ^ | 3/25/2011 | Daniel Halper

Posted on 03/25/2011 9:53:36 AM PDT by xtinct

General Electric paid no American taxes in 2010, the New York Times reports:

The company reported worldwide profits of $14.2 billion, and said $5.1 billion of the total came from its operations in the United States.

Its American tax bill? None. In fact, G.E. claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.

That may be hard to fathom for the millions of American business owners and households now preparing their own returns, but low taxes are nothing new for G.E. The company has been cutting the percentage of its American profits paid to the Internal Revenue Service for years, resulting in a far lower rate than at most multinational companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; ge; generalelectric; notaxes; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Lazlo in PA
Sucking up to Obummer has it's privileges.

"The assortment of tax breaks G.E. has won in Washington has provided a significant short-term gain for the company’s executives and shareholders. While the financial crisis led G.E. to post a loss in the United States in 2009, regulatory filings show that in the last five years, G.E. has accumulated $26 billion in American profits, and received a net tax benefit from the I.R.S. of $4.1 billion."

I'd say $4.1 billion in taxpayer money taken by G.E. would go just a tad beyond privilege.
21 posted on 03/25/2011 10:08:59 AM PDT by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Duh — higher prices for the company’s products. Or hadn’t you noticed?


22 posted on 03/25/2011 10:09:31 AM PDT by Tenniel2 (Ignore politics and you'll end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

I agree with your tax assessment, however the prism through which we should view this is whether or not the same tax options were available to GE’s competitors.

Is GE simply taking advantage of tax laws or is the Obambi administration picking winners and losers like they have with the GM tax breaks?


23 posted on 03/25/2011 10:09:37 AM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

GE is in bed with the loser


24 posted on 03/25/2011 10:10:51 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Beware the Corporate Gubamint Media Complex..


25 posted on 03/25/2011 10:11:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

Nobody likes taxes or wants business taxed. This is just a sign of the commie rule. There is the priveleged class that reaps the rewards and the rest of us who suffer and pay.


26 posted on 03/25/2011 10:12:21 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tenniel2

I can understand if we were talking VAT or something like that, but not income taxes.


27 posted on 03/25/2011 10:12:25 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
"Get ready to be called a commie for suggestion GE pay taxes."

I'm a commie then. GE pays no taxes on billions of dollars of profits, but the Feds raise the taxes on my lousy pension an extra $350 a year. There's something definitely wrong with that picture.

28 posted on 03/25/2011 10:13:11 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Good for GE.

Way to go.

If anyone is unaware of the fact that the US has the world’s largest capital rate, then go look it up.

Why should large corporations fork over billions of dollars to endorse Socialism in Washington DC? You and I as individuals look for ways to save our own money. Why shouldn’t GE?


29 posted on 03/25/2011 10:13:45 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus
Um, let’s all remember one thing here: businesses do not pay taxes, period. Taxes are a cost of doing business that get passed along in the cost of the business’ product or service. Whoever buys the product or service pays the tax, not the business. The business merely collects it for the government. It’s easy to get upset in a knee-jerk reaction here because we all hate GE, but in so doing, do we want to be espousing the benefits of taxation on business?

Very well said. I was going to post along the same lines and then read your post. I couldn't have said it any better so am re-posting it since it's worth repeating. I am amazed that even here on Free Republic that point is so easily lost. Corporate taxes, payroll taxes, etc. are the liberal favorites because they are hidden. I am a believer in the FairTax because you would see the taxes you are paying right on your receipt. The FairTax people also seem to forget that transparency is the biggest selling point because they get caught up in the argument of whether it would be 23% or 27% or whatever. The worry is that people will not go along with it because it is too high. The argument in return is "yes, yes it is too high." The number is set to make it revenue neutral and is what you are paying right now without realizing it. If it is too high, then lower government expenditures. It is not the FairTax fault if a revenue neutral percentage is too high. People need to see the true cost of the government.

30 posted on 03/25/2011 10:14:11 AM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Can’t wait to see how much Google was paid...


31 posted on 03/25/2011 10:14:41 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

Good points, and this article comes out in time for UK protests tomorrow against corporations to pay more taxes, calling the companies tax dodgers.


32 posted on 03/25/2011 10:15:33 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Its American tax bill? None. In fact, G.E. claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.

"A tax benefit"? So when GE got finished with it's taxes, it ended up with $3.2 billion more from the US than it started with? Impressive - most welfare leeches don't get anywhere near that kind of money.
33 posted on 03/25/2011 10:16:39 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

If anyone is unaware of the fact that the US has the world’s largest capital rate, then go look it up.

ugh.

Should read ...

If anyone is unaware of the fact that the US has the world’s largest CORPORATE TAX rate, then go look it up.


34 posted on 03/25/2011 10:16:40 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

All corporate costs get passed on to the consumer. If they gotta pay a million bucks for something you can bet prices are going up. Unless their market situation dictates they absolutely have to (ie upping their prices even a little kills sales) companies don’t eat costs, whether it’s taxes or wages or utilities they all go into figuring out how much to charge.


35 posted on 03/25/2011 10:17:01 AM PDT by discostu (this is definitely not my confused face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Even took Imelt on vacation to Brazil too! I’m sure that Jeffrey didn’t pay a dime or maybe it was one red cent.


36 posted on 03/25/2011 10:17:27 AM PDT by 23 Everest (A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
Any tax on a corporation is paid by the consumer.

Instead of asking the government to raise taxes on corporations, you should just ask them to raise your taxes directly and cut out the middleman.

37 posted on 03/25/2011 10:18:59 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

That is a target rich environment if I’ve ever seen one.


38 posted on 03/25/2011 10:20:07 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Don't confuse Obama's evil for incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Its extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore. G.E.’s giant tax department, led by a bow-tied former Treasury official named John Samuels, is often referred to as the world’s best tax law firm. Indeed, the company’s slogan “Imagination at Work” fits this department well. The team includes former officials not just from the Treasury, but also from the I.R.S. and virtually all the tax-writing committees in Congress.

While General Electric is one of the most skilled at reducing its tax burden, many other companies have become better at this as well. Although the top corporate tax rate in the United States is 35 percent, one of the highest in the world, companies have been increasingly using a maze of shelters, tax credits and subsidies to pay far less.

“He understands what it takes for America to compete in the global economy,” Mr. Obama said of Mr. Immelt, on his appointment in January

A review of company filings and Congressional records shows that one of the most striking advantages of General Electric is its ability to lobby for, win and take advantage of tax breaks.

Over the last decade, G.E. has spent tens of millions of dollars to push for changes in tax law, from more generous depreciation schedules on jet engines to “green energy” credits for its wind turbines. But the most lucrative of these measures allows G.E. to operate a vast leasing and lending business abroad with profits that face little foreign taxes and no American taxes as long as the money remains overseas.

Press Here

39 posted on 03/25/2011 10:20:42 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corporate Law
How this piece of garbage was ever Jack Welch's hand picked successor, I will never know. Jack knew how to make a profitable business. Immelt must have had earplugs in during Jacks lessons because he is the polar opposite. Just look at how he ran GE into the ground.


40 posted on 03/25/2011 10:20:42 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson