Skip to comments.
On The Japanese Quake and Tsunami (analysis of the nuclear reactor type that exploded)
market-ticker.org ^
| 3-12-11
| Karl Denninger
Posted on 03/12/2011 4:32:21 PM PST by dynachrome
A primer for those who are not familiar with nuclear power in general may be helpful. The plants in question are "BWR" plants, or "Boiling Water Reactors." Fuel comprising a mixture that contains Uranium-235 and/or Plutonium-239 are placed into rods with a zirconium cladding. These are arranged inside a high-pressure container. Hydraulically-controlled rods that contain material that absorbs neutrons are placed in the core as well. The pressure vessel is filled with ordinary water.
...steam outlet to the turbines is closed. This causes the pressure to rise rapidly and the steam to collapse back to liquid water in part of the reactor. That in turn causes a temporary power spike in the output of the reactor until the control rods are fully re-inserted, as the neutron moderation capacity goes up as the steam bubbles collapse.
(Excerpt) Read more at market-ticker.org ...
TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; denninger; explosion; fukushima; ge; japan; reactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Move to blog area if necessary, but I thought this was good info.
To: dynachrome
Wasn't the explosion the outer building and wasn't it designed with blow out panels? The reactor did not blow up. The containment is still intact.
To: dynachrome
It seems like the real problem is that the backup diesel generators were not tsunami-proof.
Could they have put them fifty feet above the ground level, maybe? Let that salt water flow underneath them.
To: mountainlion
“The containment is still intact”
correct. There are still big problems if cesium is being detected outside of the vessel.
4
posted on
03/12/2011 4:40:34 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: mountainlion
My addendunm to the headline was not clear. ahould say “the building around the containment vessel” (most likely a hydrogen explosion)
5
posted on
03/12/2011 4:43:03 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: mountainlion
Personally I think restricting the building new technologically advanced reactors increases the danger in America.
We’re forced to rely on nuclear plants far past their intended service life because new ones aren’t being built.
6
posted on
03/12/2011 4:47:55 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: dynachrome
“Move to blog area if necessary, but I thought this was good info.”
A most excellent article!
7
posted on
03/12/2011 5:02:12 PM PST
by
mongo141
To: cripplecreek
Reactors the size of an Aircraft carrier or sub are probably the most trouble free and efficient. New designs are amazing. Safety should be phenomenal. I saw one that ran on spent uranium. They make these look old fashioned.
To: mountainlion
We’ve regulated ourselves into danger. Its the same with our aging pipelines.
Risk has become more cost effective than trying to keep up with regulation.
9
posted on
03/12/2011 5:15:13 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: dynachrome
Does the cesium release indicate that, although the containment structure is still intact, it may have been damaged by the quake and is leaking?
10
posted on
03/12/2011 5:36:43 PM PST
by
Jedidah
To: Jedidah
If I understand it correctly, it may mean that the fuel rods are damaged, which is not good.
11
posted on
03/12/2011 5:39:14 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: dynachrome
Totally LOVE your tagline!!!!!
(request permission to use it whenever the subject comes up!)
12
posted on
03/12/2011 5:44:15 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: dynachrome
Denninger totally amazes me sometimes. He wrote that so even I could understand it, and I'm one of those that says, "Nooo-cleee-yur? Noook-ya-ler? Duhrrr?"
ANd I love how he wraps that blog post up. If you're not willing to live with the risks associated with First World benefits, then you better be living in a hut and eating bark off the trees and walking, not driving, when you go out to milk your goats every day before you start telling everybody else how to live.
13
posted on
03/12/2011 5:44:54 PM PST
by
ponygirl
To: KoRn
14
posted on
03/12/2011 5:49:56 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: ponygirl
I’ve been following his posts on the real estate mess for a while.
15
posted on
03/12/2011 5:51:17 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: cripplecreek
Totally agree. The worst case scenario happened and 50 or so nuclear plants in Japan are up and running.
16
posted on
03/12/2011 5:52:57 PM PST
by
listenhillary
(Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
To: Jedidah; dynachrome
137Cs is a fission product so it indicates somehow there are fission products in the release. It could be a partially damaged core. But it could also be a result of the earlier pressure releases where coolant had to be spurted out to relieve pressure when they lost their auxiliary cooling capability. There was a partial failure of containment isolation when emergency power was unavailable, and that allowed some containment effluent to be released to the outside. There is always a small inventory of fission products in the coolant of a LWR and we may be seeing those, not necessarily damaged fuel (although it could be that too).
17
posted on
03/12/2011 6:01:41 PM PST
by
chimera
To: listenhillary
The worst case scenario happened and 50 or so nuclear plants in Japan are up and running. Yet world renowned physicist, Michio Kaku, has gone on record with the statement that this is the second worst nuclear plant disaster in history - right behind Chernobyl.
My deep respect for the man just became very shallow.
18
posted on
03/12/2011 6:18:35 PM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Windflier
19
posted on
03/12/2011 6:29:13 PM PST
by
listenhillary
(Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
To: Windflier
I may have misinterpreted your post. Sorry.
20
posted on
03/12/2011 6:30:15 PM PST
by
listenhillary
(Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson