Move to blog area if necessary, but I thought this was good info.
To: dynachrome
Wasn't the explosion the outer building and wasn't it designed with blow out panels? The reactor did not blow up. The containment is still intact.
To: dynachrome
It seems like the real problem is that the backup diesel generators were not tsunami-proof.
Could they have put them fifty feet above the ground level, maybe? Let that salt water flow underneath them.
To: dynachrome
“Move to blog area if necessary, but I thought this was good info.”
A most excellent article!
7 posted on
03/12/2011 5:02:12 PM PST by
mongo141
To: dynachrome
Denninger totally amazes me sometimes. He wrote that so even I could understand it, and I'm one of those that says, "Nooo-cleee-yur? Noook-ya-ler? Duhrrr?"
ANd I love how he wraps that blog post up. If you're not willing to live with the risks associated with First World benefits, then you better be living in a hut and eating bark off the trees and walking, not driving, when you go out to milk your goats every day before you start telling everybody else how to live.
13 posted on
03/12/2011 5:44:54 PM PST by
ponygirl
To: dynachrome
Are these some of the reactors that our government bailed-out G.E. built for them.?
23 posted on
03/12/2011 6:41:42 PM PST by
fella
(.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson