Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Daniels walks back comments about Dem fleebaggers
The American Thinker ^ | 2/27/2011 | Ralph Alter

Posted on 02/28/2011 5:02:08 AM PST by Lakeshark

After a considerable amount of blowback over Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels cuddly response to the flee-bagging Indiana Democrat legislator's run-and-hide strategy to avoid facing the consequences of their electoral defeat in the 2010 mid-terms, Daniels appeared on Fox News with Neal Cavuto to apologize for misspeaking.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 2012; capitulate; democratparty; democrats; demopcrats; fleebaggerparty; fleebaggers; unions; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
This a good article, it even allows for a rebuttal from the Daniels camp. He may run, but this incident, along with his continual white flag waving to the demcorats about social issues has damaged him greatly. It's a worthwhile and short article.

Have at it.

1 posted on 02/28/2011 5:02:11 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onyx; Virginia Ridgerunner; Clyde5445; sarah fan UK; Victoria Delsoul; All
From the article: Unfortunately, that energy can sometimes result in misleading information. Republican political operative Aaron Reber's response to my blog reporting Daniel's inappropriate and inadequate response to the fleebaggers suggests that Daniels was misquoted by "a media source." That media source was the Indy Star, Indiana's leading newspaper and an enthusiastic endorser of Daniels' candidacy. They have printed no corrections or retractions and there will be none forthcoming because there was no misquote as Daniel's admits on Cavuto.
2 posted on 02/28/2011 5:04:19 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Fox is trying to rehab Mitch Daniel’s candidacy after he screwed up last week. I guess he’s the anointed big government nominee the powers-that-be have decided the GOP will run next year.
No wonder patriots don’t trust any media.


3 posted on 02/28/2011 5:09:04 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
The next Conservative Presidential candidate MUST be someone who doesn't apologize for Conservatism. We don't want a Candidate who is continually walking backwards.

"Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense”

Churchill retreated from a losing battle in 1940's France:- but he did not give in. He reloaded.

4 posted on 02/28/2011 5:12:25 AM PST by agere_contra (Historically every time the Left has 'expanded its moral imagination' the results have been horrific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Daniels has done nothing as of late to earn my vote. He is truly an establishment, DC beltway RINO.


5 posted on 02/28/2011 5:12:25 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

“Fox is trying to rehab Mitch Daniel’s candidacy after he screwed up last week. I guess he’s the anointed big government nominee the powers-that-be have decided the GOP will run next year.
No wonder patriots don’t trust any media.”

Yep - looks like he’s the guy. It was McCain in 2008. I guess the question is whether we again allow the media to select our candidate, or do we REPUBLICANS have any say in it?


6 posted on 02/28/2011 5:12:59 AM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

The only reason he would run is to be a spoiler like the rest of them.


7 posted on 02/28/2011 5:19:42 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
I was interested in him earlier until he started to walk back on social positions a couple of months back. This absolute tone deaf response to the fleebaggers is the opposite of Walker, and it's going to make it real hard for the base to want to support him if he runs and wins.

The unions are fighting hard, and he just blew it big time with them.

8 posted on 02/28/2011 5:21:27 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobL
I guess the question is whether we again allow the media to select our candidate, or do we REPUBLICANS have any say in it?

One man, one vote; The media does not select the candidate. The media is a convenient, and deserving, scapegoat for those ultimately responsible for our candidates, the voters.

9 posted on 02/28/2011 5:21:48 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I’m thinking he personally wants to run, and he is also being prodded by GOP insiders and perhaps a certain candidate from Massachusetts to throw his hat in the ring. He was fairly successful in Indiana from what I understand, but he sure has failed the past few months. He’s on strike two and a bunch of foul balls one after another for me right now.


10 posted on 02/28/2011 5:26:31 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

“The media does not select the candidate.”

LOL. True for the Democrats...not true in 2008.


11 posted on 02/28/2011 5:29:30 AM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

He did not mis-speak. He spoke what he felt. He’s apologizing because he made the mistake of thinking inside the belt-way milquetoast RINO Bush-like thought processes appeal to us and he is SHOCKED at our uncouth response. But, he needs our votes if he wants to run for the White House. Too late you worm. You screwed up and tipped your hand. We’re on to you.


12 posted on 02/28/2011 5:29:33 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Leave the gun. Take the canolis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I agree. Maybe he can have a flash of good sense.


13 posted on 02/28/2011 5:30:52 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Never apologize. It's a sign of weakness.
14 posted on 02/28/2011 5:39:44 AM PST by Tupelo (The Boudicca from Wasilla supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
Never apologize unless you're wrong. But of course Daniels wasn't wrong.
15 posted on 02/28/2011 5:41:28 AM PST by agere_contra (Historically every time the Left has 'expanded its moral imagination' the results have been horrific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

“I was interested in him earlier until he started to walk back on social positions a couple of months back.”

Yeah, same here. I have defended his previous bulldog approach to fiscal issues but his backing down on social and collective bargaining issues have soured me big time.


16 posted on 02/28/2011 5:44:42 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Never apologize, it’s a sign of weakness

Gibb’s Rules


17 posted on 02/28/2011 5:46:22 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Part of what Walker is trying to do Mitch did right after he came into office some time ago.

On January 11, 2005 he unilaterally rescinded all collective bargaining rights of state employees and voided pre-existing contracts.

Was anyone here aware of that?


18 posted on 02/28/2011 5:46:58 AM PST by John W (Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
I agree, he spoke like a true waver of the white flag for the sake of "getting along".

It's not a good sign, kind of showing his naivete towards the left, and I for one don't want that for our nominee or president.

19 posted on 02/28/2011 5:47:05 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John W
I was not aware of that, do you happen to have any links?

Also, if that's true, why did he reverse his position this past week on the unions and the right to work stuff? It's pretty clear from the article Daniels knows he screwed up this past week.

20 posted on 02/28/2011 5:50:32 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson