Posted on 02/23/2011 7:08:42 PM PST by Nachum
Edited on 02/24/2011 8:25:29 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
As pressure mounts on the White House to intervene to stop Moammar Gadhafi's bloody crackdown in Libya, many commentators have been wondering why Barack Obama has been cautious in his criticism of the dictator after the U.S. president so fervently supported the removal from office of U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak of Egypt.
Excerpt, read more at Fox Nation
Interesting. So does this mean that Soros isnt behind all of this but maybe someone on “our “ side is behind it.
Had George Bush’s pastor previously met with....oh say a leader of the KKK, you don’t think it would have made news during the time he was running for Pres?
You’re baaad......Beat me to it!!!!!!
Interesting. I knew the story about Percy Sutton helping Obama get into Harvard as a favor to Khalid al Mansour, who was backing Obama financially, but I hadn’t seen that video.
Sure it would’ve been HUGE news. I guess you were originally asking a rhetorical question? Hard to tell over the internet.
It’s a creep one for sure...
It was the one that convinced me all the other crazy videos about him were true.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Carter"
Libya
In late 1978 and early 1979, Billy Carter visited Libya three times with a contingent from Georgia. He eventually registered as a foreign agent of the Libyan government and received a $220,000 loan. (Edwin P. Wilson alleged that he had seen a telegram showing that Libyans paid Billy Carter two million dollars.[2]) This led to a Senate hearing over alleged influence peddling which some in the press dubbed "Billygate". A Senate sub-committee was called To Investigate Activities of Individuals Representing Interests of Foreign Governments (Billy Carter-Libya Investigation). On Aug. 4, 1980, President Jimmy Carter wrote: "I am deeply concerned that Billy has received funds from Libya and that he may be under obligation to Libya. These facts will govern my relationship with Billy as long as I am president. Billy has had no influence on U.S. policy or actions concerning Libya in the past, and he will have no influence in the future."[3]
Whatever Jimmy Carter, you Marxist bastard!
You all do know it’s ex-Soviet Special Forces (Spesnatz) that are the foreign mercs Qadafi is using to slaughter his discenters right now?
Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of Obama’s longtime Chicago church, went with Farrakhan to visit Gadhafi in 1984.
This is 2 years before we bombed him....
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Wright himself noted the trip could cause problems for Obama.
“When [Obama’s] enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli to visit [Gadhafi] with Farrakhan, a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell.”
Farrakhan, a close friend and associate of Wright, has been financed by Gadhafi, including with a $5 million interest-free loan in 1985.
Later that year, Gadhafi spoke by satellite to Farrakhan’s Saviour’s Day Convention in Chicago, and reportedly told Farrakhan supporters he was prepared to provide weapons to a black army in the U.S. to destroy “white America.”
Read more: Obama’s mystery links to Gadhafi uncovered http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=267361#ixzz1EscX7j5e
Everyone seems to forget that terrorism was originally started and sponsored by the Soviet Union to destabilize the Middle East.
Yes, but by the looks of it, no one cares and they won’t until it is too late.
That's a good observation but do you think the operative links are still there? Do you think, for instance, that Russia and China get along? Or that Russia has much influence in the mideast, possibly in Iran?
My guess is that now, with Russia at least somewhat more civilized, they probably wish they hadn't started the whole terrorism game, although I'm sure they would deny having done that. To be fair, you could also argue that the Russians would benefit from turmoil in the Middle East in a different way, since they have huge oil reserves themselves.
Calypso Louie don't lie.
Several talking heads from different networks have been asking, “Why did it take him so long to say something about Libya? (0bama)”
Fox has been asking why 0bama would not mention Kadaffy by name. It is as if they are begging folks to research the links to 0bama.
FReepers, always in the lead!
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.