Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona SB1178 Moves Forward: Felony Charges for Federal Agents?
Tenth Amendment Center ^ | 02-21-2011 | Michael Boldin

Posted on 02/21/2011 11:46:46 AM PST by RepublicnotaDemocracy

Late last week, the Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1178, the Intrastate Commerce Act. The bill provides that all services performed in the state, and all goods grown or made here for consumption within Arizona “are not subject to the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the several states.”

The vote was 21-8-1

Included in the bill’s language are penalties for federal agents violating the state law – in James Madison’s words, interposition, or “standing between” the federal government and the people of the state.

The bill states that any federal agent or employee who attempts to enforce any federal act, rule or regulation over these activities is guilty of a Class 6 felony. While the measure does not seek jail time, it allows fines of up to $2,000. And any state official that tries to enforce a federal law could face a $500 fine.

Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, who crafted most of the proposals, said it’s time Arizona stood up to the federal government. And she said if arresting some federal officials is what it takes, she’s prepared to do that.

“If we don’t show that we’re serious about this, then how is the federal government going to respect us?” Allen continued. “Instead, they come into our state and they fine us … and fine our businesses and our farmers.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; buttoutfeds; constitution; nullification; statesrights; yayarizona
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

My husband and I have lived most of our childhoods and all of our adult lives in Arizona. We are proud that our state is being sued right and left by the Obama administration. Means we’re doing something RIGHT. Stand your ground, Jan!


21 posted on 02/21/2011 12:39:26 PM PST by stansblugrassgrl (PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE AMMUNITION!!! YEEEEEHAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
" any federal agent or employee who attempts to enforce any federal act, rule or regulation over these activities is guilty of a Class 6 felony"

From the first paragraph, it appears that "these activities" are:

"[...] all services performed in the state, and all goods grown or made here for consumption within Arizona [, which] 'are not subject to the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the several states.'"

22 posted on 02/21/2011 12:41:01 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot1
Making popcorn, having a beer [...].

OK, just don't ask me to hold it while you do something outstanding.

≤};^)

23 posted on 02/21/2011 12:44:28 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Usually the folks in the Darwin Awards are credited for saying things like that.
“Hey dude, hold my beer. I have an idea.”


24 posted on 02/21/2011 12:52:15 PM PST by TexasPatriot1 (I am unique, Just like everybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot1

Yes, we know. But we can hope.
The next election, I hope, will bring someone of Jan Brewer’s ilk and testicular fortitude?


If any state can find another Jan Brewer....it would be Texas.

Rick Perry is just a fraud, a Bush Liberal RINO


25 posted on 02/21/2011 12:52:27 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Newt Gingrich and Chris Matthews: Seperated at Birth??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

Congress is allowed to pass all laws “necessary and proper” to carry out its duties, as set forth in Article 1, Section 8.

But that only applies to laws that Congress passes to enact their PROPER duties. Just because Congress passes a law DOES NOT make that law “necessary and proper” and therefore the supreme law of the land. (And the Supreme Court does NOT have ultimate juridiction here ... WE DO!)

Arizona has every right to nullify a law that it deems to be in violation of the Constitution. Each of the several States holds that right, since they are party to the contract that created THEIR created central government.

The feds had better wake up to the fact that they are a limited entity, and do so BEFORE the states figure out that their creation needs a good beat-down!


26 posted on 02/21/2011 12:54:56 PM PST by DNME (With the sound of distant drums ... something wicked this way comes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Preaching to the choir.
I am still puzzled that we can’t find anyone that is NOT a RINO to bid against him in the primary.
I am not feeling good about being a Texan right now.
But hey, we still have the cannon and we’re still waiting for someone to come and take it.
(Look it up)


27 posted on 02/21/2011 12:55:29 PM PST by TexasPatriot1 (I am unique, Just like everybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

hate to say this, but some of the Several States would be quite broke not being able to house Federal prisoners for Uncle Sam. The County Sheriff gets alot of equipment and income from DC in this way. This bill would sure kill that.


28 posted on 02/21/2011 1:01:24 PM PST by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

Awesome!...except how did this state re-elect John McCain again?


29 posted on 02/21/2011 1:16:08 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

The missing “nanny state”ism. People aren’t used to that.


30 posted on 02/21/2011 1:29:54 PM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

Nice job! If it fails try, try, try again! Never give up!

We will admission them into the ground! Make the land as hostile to their unconstitutional intrusions as possible.

Make governing domestically as difficult and unworthy of their effort as possible. Let the warring shot be fired. and let the republican patriots in congress take note and uses that shot to justify further cuts.

Tell their big government democratic counterparts that the States want not their interference, and they should therefore wast not our money paying for it.

Force them to focus on the actual foreign responsibility of the Federal government. You know foreign responsibility ranging from illegal immigration, to foreign wars both economic(trade manipulation) and military.


31 posted on 02/21/2011 2:10:32 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Does that mean Rick Perry squats to pee??


32 posted on 02/21/2011 2:40:25 PM PST by S.O.S121.500 (That Kenyan bastard is not my president. ENFORCE the Bill of Rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: S.O.S121.500

“Does that mean Rick Perry squats to pee??”

Caut with his pants down.. If the Texas Legislator fails to get at least this far they could be declared coward.

Out Texan by a bunch of Arizonans... Pitiful...


33 posted on 02/21/2011 4:38:35 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy; 17th Miss Regt; 2001convSVT; 2ndDivisionVet; A_Former_Democrat; ...
Thanks Army Air Corps! I just hope initiatives like this are a first step towards a complete debunking, defunding, defanging, deconstructing of the misappropriaton of the "Commerce Clause" by the federales and are not an end game strategy. These initiatives in and of themselves are fine as far as they go but do not address the elephant in the room of the feral government's co-opting of ALL things commerce or otherwise, IMHO of course.

Mixed feelings ~ping~

34 posted on 02/21/2011 5:43:17 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy; ForGod'sSake

“Sen. Sylvia Allen”

Again, conservative women showing the way!


35 posted on 02/21/2011 5:48:59 PM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Indeed. The emasculation of America is very near completion.


36 posted on 02/21/2011 6:24:59 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks ForGod’sSake.


37 posted on 02/21/2011 6:32:05 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tenthirteen

“hate to say this, but some of the Several States would be quite broke not being able to house Federal prisoners for Uncle Sam. The County Sheriff gets alot of equipment and income from DC in this way. This bill would sure kill that.”

If the money stayed at home it wouldn’t have to come from the fed.


38 posted on 02/21/2011 6:33:42 PM PST by davetex (All my weapons got melted by a meteor!! No Sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

It’s about time! The Commerce Clause has been misused to a ridiculous degree to nationalize almost all governmental decision making.


39 posted on 02/21/2011 6:40:59 PM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
At the same time, the Several States need to understand that they do not have the authority to charge their citizens any so-called “use tax” on items purchased outside their states. Those are nothing more than tariffs between the Several States. And that truly is a power granted solely to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

THANK YOU! Finally someone gets it. The reason they call them a different name is because sales taxes would be illegal, then they somehow think the name itself makes a difference and that we won't notice that it's the same percentage levied on the same goods as the sales tax would be on intrastate purchases.

40 posted on 02/21/2011 6:48:45 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson