I guess so.
Posted on 01/17/2011 5:52:26 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
Beautiful people don't just get all the breaks, scientists say they're likely smarter than most people, too.
A study in England conducted by researchers at the London School of Economics found that attractive men and women generally have higher IQs.
"Physical attractiveness is significantly positively associated with general intelligence," said LSE lead researcher Satoshi Kanazawa, in the latest issue of the journal, Intelligence.
The study indicated attractive men have IQs that are 13.6 points above the average, while beautiful women are 11.4 points higher than average.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
That’s not really fair. What did he look like as a young man, before being devastated by disease? I don’t know,,, just askin’.
“London School of Economics” was co-founded by this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw him and Margaret Sanger, founder of “Planned Parenthood” were great buddies. This “study” is not worth 2 squirts if pi$$.
Case closed
No surprise there.
I must be extremely bright.
My Father calls me sun.
ROTFLOL
You can have a high IQ and not an ounce of sense.
I wonder if plastic surgery counts?
Luckily, I have both.......;^)
Never mind my previous post. I just found some pics of Hawkin as a young man. Really goofy lookin’!
Mike, get thee to a Mensa Meeting, then get back to us.
There is an Annual Gathering in Portland this year the first week of July. You can hide in a car and observe the members entering. There IS a Beauty and Brains SIG. No information on the size of it, though.
Do your homework, then try writing the article again.
Y’all are missing the point.
This study shows an increase in IQ for good-looking (whatever that means) people that is almost exactly identical to the decrease in IQ found among blacks as compared to whites.
It is not discussing a multitude of individual people, it is discussing two mythical average people. As with the black/white difference it tells us absolutely nothing about any individual in either group.
Since good-looking people can be assumed to generally have good genetics, it is not unreasonable.
This reminds me of my very first day at high school. An absolutely gorgeous girl, a blue-eyed blonde, was walking toward me in the crowd and I quite literally walked into a phone pole.
Found out later she was “special ed,” and on the low end of the scale for that group.
I guess so.
Really?
No.
I guess 50% isn’t bad.
You are absolutely correct, of course.
"The way of a fool seems right to him, but a wise man listens to advice."
Proverbs 12:15
"Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and clever in their own sight."
Isaiah 5:21
If you have a long enough conversation with a liberal, every single one of them will tell you they are "intelligent" or "brilliant" or "highly educated."
I told a liberal this once, and he went ballistic:
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."
Proverbs 1:7
Do a google search of Sanger and eugenics
Um, you can quibble about whether she was a *leading* voice for eugenics, but she certainly was a voice for eugenics (negative eugenics, improvement of the gene pool through systematic removal of tainted genotypes. From Wikipedia:
“Keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.”
And
“Apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”
When will they have a test on wisdom?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.