Mark Levin Issues $100,000 Challenge To Chris Matthews

RCP ^ | Jan 13, 2011 | RCP

[Islander7]

Levin says he will sue if anyone makes any libelous accusation against him for being complicit in the murder of anyone.

"I'm going to drag your ass into court," Levin said.

[databoss]

Your post makes no sense. Who is doing the attacking, Levin or Matthews?

[Kegger]

Levin would have a hard time avoiding having at least one liberal on his jury and with just one liberal his case could be lost.

If I were on the jury, I would not be swayed by one liberal.

[Hammerhead]

LOL!!!!!!!!

[JohnG45]

How about $100,000 challenge for a $12 Long Form Birth Certificate WITH an explanation of why it took over 2.5 years since there’s no problem with the data?

Mark Levin won't go there. Won't even mention it. Why?

He has the platform. He has the expertise. And, he knows his way through the Federal Courts. But, he won't touch it. Why?

Mark Levin, the Great One? I don't think so.

[SueRae]

About time.

[Incorrigible]

In my head, Mark Levin is on the air all the time!

[mad_as_he$$]

lol...

[pingman]

Being intolerant of fools and idiots is no vice.

Get a clue.

[Fudd Fan]

That’s why he was specific about it. geeez

[Fudd Fan]

Mark Levin won't go there. Won't even mention it. Why?

Because it's going nowhere, that's why.

[JohnG45]

Because it's going nowhere, that's why.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know you were the sole arbitrator of this issue. Forgive me for stating the obvious. Did you ever consider that if this subject was spoken about from the getgo, we would not have been subject to BO? But not a word from the self described, "Defender of the Constitution", Mark Levin. What a joke!

Mark Levin, the Great One? Wrong, I call him the Not So Great One.

Mark Levin is a phony.

[CodeToad]

“he indulges in ad hominem attacks on callers and political figures.”

He calls it like they are. If that hurts your feeeeelings, grow up.

[Fudd Fan]

It’s “arbiter” but how would you know.

In addition to being a one-issue jerk, you assume a lot.

[JohnG45]

It’s “arbiter” but how would you know.

In addition to being a one-issue jerk, you assume a lot.

Isn't there a rule somewhere that states that when your opponent in a debate starts calling you names you have essentially won the debate?

Let me just remind you that there are people who have fought and died for that Constitution and some of them faced odds that were unbelievable. For instance, the US Army Rangers ascended the cliffs at Pointe du Hoc in the face of point-blank machine gun fire while hand grenades rained down on top of them. Did they stop and say, "this is not going anywhere" as that phony Mark Levin appears to say, but instead forged ahead.

And today, when someone appears to violate requirements for the Presidency that are enshrined in our Constitution, where is your boy? I'll tell you where, hiding under his bed and coming up with excuses like, "this isn't going anywhere".

He has the platform, the expertise necessary and he wimps out.

Let me repeat, one more time, Mark Levin is a phony

[Paladin2]

"He calls it like they are."

It's a lame approach relied on way too frequently. If he is so smart, there are better ways of putting people down.

[Chunga]

Mark Levin, the Great One? Wrong, I call him the Not So Great One.

Mark Levin is a phony.

No conservative thinks Mark Levin is a phony.

You're a troll and a liberal idiot.

[aruanan]

Mark Levin is a phony.

No conservative thinks Mark Levin is a phony.

You're a troll and a liberal idiot.

Based on the comment, it's probably Debbie Schlussel.

[Chunga]

It's a lame approach relied on way too frequently. If he is so smart, there are better ways of putting people down.

Wow...that's some serious concern you've got going there.

Why don't you start your own talk show so we can hear how it should be done?

Conservatives don't besmirch their own, Sparky. Levin's on my side. Take a hike.

[aruanan]

Is that you again, Debbie?