Islamic modesty is complete BS. They patronize strippers, view porn, drink alcohol, beat their slaves to death, rape women and murder infidels when they feel like it. The Sharia’s rules are for the dhimmis, stupid!
If the warriors for womens right, the feminazi’s of the NOW arent worried about it why should I?
What’s the news, here? This sounds exactly like a social order created in the mind of a madman in the seventh century, embellished by his own lunatic ravings, and fed by his base urges that included torture, murder, and at least one sham marriage to a child of six.
What I find most astounding about islam is that so many people seem to accept the cult order. I did read a bit of work, a couple days back, that postulated a theory for the continued incivility of the muslims. According to the researchers it springs from the significant percentage of the islamic population that has engaged in consanguinity over the last 1400 years or so. The lowered average IQ, and the increased occurrence of birth defects, stillbirths, etc., statistically correlate to the higher incidence of consanguineous marriage and inbreeding. Interesting stuff.
Doesn’t change a lot, though.
This social order masquerading as a pseudo-religion is a cancer on humanity.
Anyone who has actually read the Qur’an knows Islam is a bloodthirsty religion.
“Don’t make friends with Jews or Christians” and “anyone who cannot be converted is to be killed.”
But it’s the religion of peace! And I’ve got a bridge I want to sell you.
> Islam: A Religion Custom Made For Men
Islam: A Religion Custom Made by a Foaming Genocidal Savage to Enslave the World And Kill Billions While Doing It
I was reading this passage from the book of Revelation. When it mentioned the beheadings of Christians that is to come, I immediately thought of the murderers being Islam.
"And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years." (Revelation 20:4)
Islam is the problem.
One may wonder then why is it that millions of Muslim women meekly submit to their subservient rank.
Some women like to be tied up and spanked and other kinky stuff (guilt?)anyway the feed the fire of Islam.
I purchased a burqua from an online Afghani salesman who dealt in modest clothing for my International Studies class. When it came in the mail, I opened up the package and put it on and walked in our living room to show my husband. Every drop of color drained from his face and he asked me to remove it. He then asked me to please never put it on in his presence again.
The burqua turns women to inanimate objects and completely erases everything you are.
That completely defines the definition of the relationship of male/female Muslims.
“Men” is not the right word to describe male Muslims.
Hey! Satan has a religion for everyone. Don’t like Baptist? Try Mormon. Don’t like Mormon? Try Catholic. It goes on and on and on and on. You name it, you’ll find one you’ll like.
And they all lead to Hell.
And Islam is completely twisted, perverse and evil as to what IS moral in their religion. For example, Allah/Mohammed orders the murder of people, who leave Islam. Can you say Mafia? I thought you could.
Allah/Mohammed orders the murder, subjugation or humiliation of all non-believers. Eventually, Allah wants to see the genocide of every non-Muslim. Only Muslims will be alive. One problem with that is Muslims for centuries have been murdering other Muslims in arguments about who are real Muslims.
The bottom line is that Islam is a religion of murder and genocide. That's the Islam's final solution.
Many of these women are worse than the men; ferocious toward their own daughters and other women.
My father once observed that there was usually little to fear from a man who would hit a woman.
My understanding of Islam is that it is a cheap “rip-off” of Judaism and Christianity that rejects both.
Without reading the rest of the article, and this may be contained therein, ever notice how many cults try to appeal to men with the claims of sexual pleasure for all eternity?
In the heat of the Missouri Mormon War of 1838, Joseph Smith made the following claim,
I will be to this generation a second Mohammed, whose motto in treating for peace was the Alcoran [Koran] or the Sword. So shall it eventually be with usJoseph Smith or the Sword! [1]
It is most interesting that a self-proclaimed Christian prophet would liken himself to Mohammed, the founder of Islam. His own comparison invites us to take a closer look as well. And when we do, we find some strikingand troublingparallels. Consider the following.
· Mohammed and Joseph Smith both had humble beginnings. Neither had formal religious connections or upbringing, and both were relatively uneducated. Both founded new religions by creating their own scriptures. In fact, followers of both prophets claim these scriptures are miracles since their authors were the most simple and uneducated of men.[2]
· Both prophets claim of having angel visitations, and of receiving divine revelation to restore pure religion to the earth again. Mohammed was told that both Jews and Christians had long since corrupted their scriptures and religion. In like manner, Joseph Smith was told that all of Christianity had become corrupt, and that consequently the Bible itself was no longer reliable. In both cases, this corruption required a complete restoration of both scripture and religion. Nothing which preceded either prophet could be relied upon any longer. Both prophets claim they were used of God to restore eternal truths which once existed on earth, but had been lost due to human corruption.
· Both prophets created new scripture which borrowed heavily from the Bible, but with a substantially new spin. In his Koran, Mohammed appropriates a number of Biblical themes and charactersbut he changes the complete sense of many passages, claiming to correct the Bible. In so doing he changes many doctrines, introducing his own in their place. In like manner, Joseph Smith created the Book of Mormon, much of which is plagiarized directly from the King James Bible. Interestingly, the Book of Mormon claims that this same Bible has been substantially corrupted and is therefore unreliable. In addition, Joseph Smith went so far as to actually create his own version of the Bible itself, the Inspired Version, in which he both adds and deletes significant portions of text, claiming he is correcting it. In so doing he also changes many doctrines, introducing his own in their place.
· As a part of their new scriptural spin, both prophets saw themselves as prophesied in scripture, and both saw themselves as a continuation of a long line of Biblical prophets. Mohammed saw himself as a continuation of the ministry of Moses and Jesus. Joseph Smith saw himself as a successor to Enoch, Melchizedek, Joseph and Moses. Joseph Smith actually wrote himself into his own version of the Bibleby name.
· Both prophets held up their own scripture as superior to the Bible. Mohammed claimed that the Koran was a perfect copy of the original which was in heaven. The Koran is therefore held to be absolutely perfect, far superior to the Bible and superceding it. In like manner, Joseph Smith also made the following claim. I told the Brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding its precepts, than by any other book.[3]
· Despite their claim that the Bible was corrupt, both prophets admonished their followers to adhere to its teachings. An obvious contradiction, this led to selective acceptance of some portions and wholesale rejection of others. As a result, the Bible is accepted by both groups of followers only to the extent that it agrees with their prophets own superior revelation.
· Both Mohammed and Joseph Smith taught that true salvation was to be found only in their respective religions. Those who would not accept their message were considered infidels, pagans or Gentiles. In so doing, both prophets became the enemy of genuine Christianity, and have led many people away from the Christ of the Bible.
· Both prophets encountered fierce opposition to their new religions and had to flee from town to town because of threats on their lives. Both retaliated to this opposition by forming their own militias. Both ultimately set up their own towns as model societies.
· Both Mohammed and Joseph Smith left unclear instructions about their successors. The majority of Mohammed's followers, Sunni Muslims, believe they were to elect their new leader, whereas the minority, Shiite Muslims, believe Mohammed's son was to be their next leader. Similarly, the majority of Joseph Smiths followers, Mormons, believed their next prophet should have been the existing leader of their quorum of twelve apostles, whereas the minority, RLDS, believed Joseph Smiths own son should have been their next prophet. Differences on this issue, and many others, have created substantial tension between these rival groups of each prophet.
· Mohammed taught that Jesus was just another of a long line of human prophets, of which he was the last. He taught that he was superior to Christ and superceded Him. In comparison, Joseph Smith also made the following claim.
I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him, but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet.[4]
Endnotes
[1] Joseph Smith made this statement at the conclusion of a speech in the public square at Far West, Missouri on October 14, 1838. This particular quote is documented in Fawn M. Brodie, No Man Knows My History, second edition, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971), p. 230231. Fawn Brodies footnote regarding this speech contains valuable information, and follows. Except where noted, all the details of this chapter [16] are taken from the History of the [Mormon] Church. This speech, however, was not recorded there, and the report given here is based upon the accounts of seven men. See the affidavits of T.B. Marsh, Orson Hyde, George M. Hinkle, John Corrill, W.W. Phelps, Samson Avard, and Reed Peck in Correspondence, Orders, etc., pp. 579, 97129. The Marsh and Hyde account, which was made on October 24, is particularly important. Part of it was reproduced in History of the [Mormon] Church, Vol. III, p. 167. See also the Peck manuscript, p. 80. Joseph himself barely mentioned the speech in his history; see Vol. III, p. 162.
...as long as they don’t like to drink.
Islam is only custom made for the men who are into beheading people etc.