Skip to comments.Supreme Court rules against Miller
Posted on 12/22/2010 3:43:23 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
The Alaska Supreme Court today ruled against Joe Miller on all counts, a decision that leaves his challenge of Sen. Lisa Murkowskis victory on life support.
(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...
Fur shur she's not reliable enough a vote for the Republicans to tolerate her.
The people of Alaska made the sandwich, now they have to eat it.
Minnesota ballot counting in Alaska.
BO is very grateful to Lisa and her daddy, who bought her votes from the Eskimos so she could help him shut down missile defense of the USA today.
To many “Pork” hungry voters. We end up with McCainiac and MooCowski...
I’m also concerned that the letter of the law means nothing.
Miller is right to pursue this to the bitter end, to the last appeal in Federal Court although that does not look good.
Yep, you don’t have to hunt to make that sandwich just keep your eyes on the ground.
That's what bothers me the most, too. We are no longer a land of laws. We are a land run by judges who decide how they want things to come out politically.
Of course they did. They belong to the Palin-hating, Alaskan good old boys club don’t they?
In this lame duck session, she voted:
She voted like a liberal Democrat. She should switch parties.
Murk just voted with her caucus on the Nuke treaty.
There’s a reason the left supports her.
That will happen when Nome Alaska enjoys a tropical climate!!!
Pity, but not unexpected. Sometimes, liars win.
These days, I’d say it’s almost always, once government is involved. All the descriptions in the Grinch song are too mild for how the government stinks at this point.
We did not go nearly far enough in exposing these feckless bastards this election cycle. In addition, the Tea Party in a couple of instances, put forth candidates who were incapable of keeping their mouths sufficiently shut so as to get themselves elected. Examples include Angle and the loon from Delaware O’Donnell. We need to run solid conservatives if we are to have any hope of taking over the Senate, not some fringe person whose ideas are so nutty that they can’t attract reasonable conservatives let alone the namby pamby middle. If the Tea Party had gotten behind someone who was electable in Nevada, Harry Reid would not have been able to wreak the havoc he has in the Lame Duck Session. So now let’s hear from you “purists” who would have rather run Angle and lost, than someone else and won. Personally, I shuddered each time both of these nutballs opened their mouths. The results were predictable, Reid could not have hoped for a more flawed opponent than Angle. The folks in Nevada (and I have family there) really wanted Reid gone, but not bad enough to go for Sharron.
The reality is that Miller should have won easily. He had the official backing of the GOP (I agree is was lukewarm support at best) and the supposed Palin machine. It wasn’t even close at the end of the day. As much as I love Sarah, this tells me alot about her potential as the lead person on a Presidential ticket. If she couldn’t help Miller win Alaska, she has no hope to win America. I hope she stays as a pundit for the next two years, then runs in 2014 for the nomination to go up against the Dem who stole the election from Ted Stevens in 2008.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.