Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twister881

We did not go nearly far enough in exposing these feckless bastards this election cycle. In addition, the Tea Party in a couple of instances, put forth candidates who were incapable of keeping their mouths sufficiently shut so as to get themselves elected. Examples include Angle and the loon from Delaware O’Donnell. We need to run solid conservatives if we are to have any hope of taking over the Senate, not some fringe person whose ideas are so nutty that they can’t attract reasonable conservatives let alone the namby pamby middle. If the Tea Party had gotten behind someone who was electable in Nevada, Harry Reid would not have been able to wreak the havoc he has in the Lame Duck Session. So now let’s hear from you “purists” who would have rather run Angle and lost, than someone else and won. Personally, I shuddered each time both of these nutballs opened their mouths. The results were predictable, Reid could not have hoped for a more flawed opponent than Angle. The folks in Nevada (and I have family there) really wanted Reid gone, but not bad enough to go for Sharron.


19 posted on 12/22/2010 4:08:36 PM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387

If you want to change the outcome of the elections, by changing the Republican Party, the BEST way to do that is to get inside the Republican Party as a precinct committeeman.

Go here to my blog and spend 13 minutes learning about The Neighborhood Precinct Committeeman Strategy:

http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

It works.

Go here to read a couple examples:

http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2010/12/04/they-stopped-complaining-about-the-republican-party-and-did-something-about-it/

http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2010/05/08/2101-of-3500-of-75000-denied-bob-bennett/

If we conservatives UNITE inside the Republican Party, and fill up the one-half of the precinct committeeman slots nationwide that are vacant currently, we can TAKE OVER the Republican Party. Instead of complaining about “the Republican Party,” we could BECOME the Republican Party — by electing its leadership. Precinct committeeman ARE the Party. ONLY THEY elect the leadership. This is the best kept “open secret” in politics — something the incumbents and the current leadership inside the Party NEVER discuss — because they are TERRIFIED if we conservatives figure this out, we’ll take over the Party. And, it’s there for the taking, as half of the voting slots are vacant.

Spend the time to figure out The Neighborhood Precinct Committeeman Strategy — it’s just good, old-fashioned, basic American Civics 101. Which the progressives successfully stamped out of the public school curricula just about everywhere while the baby boomers were enjoying the fruits of our capitalist system.

We have the numbers. Now YOU have the know how. Will you join me in taking back the Republican Party so we can elect better, more conservatives in the primary elections?

For Liberty,
Cold Warrior
http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com


28 posted on 12/22/2010 4:35:44 PM PST by Army Cold Warrior (American first, conservative second, Republican Party precinct committeeman BY NECESSITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387
We need to run solid conservatives if we are to have any hope of taking over the Senate, not some fringe person whose ideas are so nutty that they can’t attract reasonable conservatives let alone the namby pamby middle. If the Tea Party had gotten behind someone who was electable in Nevada, Harry Reid would not have been able to wreak the havoc he has in the Lame Duck Session.

The 4 senatorial candidates most identified with the Tea Party were awful and awful-er. Rand Paul, for example, has already vowed to caucus with the Dems on several issues dear to conservatives. This will never do, but could have been avoided if folks had paid attention to the truly libertarian agenda of the Tea Party. I am quite worried as to how the newly-elected Tea Party backed representatives pan out. How many are simply libertarians? This does not bode well for our military strength and defense capabilities, as the libertarians are isolationists.

As usual, libertarians aided the Democrats in the past election because as you say, their Tea Party candidates were deeply flawed.

34 posted on 12/22/2010 4:50:51 PM PST by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

“who were incapable of keeping their mouths sufficiently shut so as to get themselves elected. Examples include Angle and the loon from Delaware O’Donnell.”

“We need to run solid conservatives”

Piss off. We need RINO lovers like you like we need a hole in the head.

COD and Angle were excellent candidates, who might have even won if RINO lovers like you had stepped up to the plate instead of slinging mud.

What did you do to help either of them win?


37 posted on 12/22/2010 4:57:51 PM PST by BenKenobi (Rush speaks! I hear, I obey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

What you have to remember is that the media will ALWAYS attack the candidates who are the most conservative, the most threatening to them. In this case, it was primarily Christine O’Donnell.

It is impossible to stop this.

However, the method to fight against this, which will always happen, is to give the media a lot of conservatives to attack.
They can’t attack them all.

Christine was a real threat to the Democrats, and they spend a lot of time and a lot of effort ensuring that she didn’t win.

She didn’t win. But Rand Paul did win. And other conservatives did win. And we kicked ass in the House. The best results in the House in my lifetime.

What happened with Christine should be repeated often.

1) Remove the RINO - VICTORY. It’s a victory right there, and after watching the Lame Duck session, we know even more that it was a victory.

2) Send out a true conservative which threatens Democrats, instead of a RINO they like.

3) Watch the media rip apart the truest conservative. It will always happen.

4) Watch the Republicans win big, because the media is so focused on the truest conservative, they’re unable to make the case for the Democrat brand, or against the Republican brand. They’re only capable of attacking the true conservative, especially when the true conservative scares them so much.

5) End result - big VICTORY. The repugnant RINO Castle is gone. And Republicans win House races across the country.

Christine was victory and we win more, better, with more Christines, not less.


43 posted on 12/22/2010 5:04:26 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

Really? What did you do? Beside complain that is. Did you bash each candidate in the manner in which you bashed them in your post?

Castle would have been a much better choice huh?

As far as Sharron Angle, that vote was lost to fraud. Do you not have critical reasoning skills? Did you not see who was in charge of what in Neveda?

Nutballs. You are a putz


47 posted on 12/22/2010 5:09:03 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (It has come to the point that we have to decide what to do with the bodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387
We need to run solid conservatives if we are to have any hope of taking over the Senate, not some fringe person whose ideas are so nutty that they can’t attract reasonable conservatives let alone the namby pamby middle.

Nutty ideas from Miller? Name them.

I'll look for your answer.

67 posted on 12/22/2010 6:23:16 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

From vette6387:

“We did not go nearly far enough in exposing these feckless bastards this election cycle. In addition, the Tea Party in a couple of instances, put forth candidates who were incapable of keeping their mouths sufficiently shut so as to get themselves elected. Examples include Angle and the loon from Delaware O’Donnell. We need to run solid conservatives if we are to have any hope of taking over the Senate, not some fringe person whose ideas are so nutty that they can’t attract reasonable conservatives let alone the namby pamby middle. If the Tea Party had gotten behind someone who was electable in Nevada, Harry Reid would not have been able to wreak the havoc he has in the Lame Duck Session. So now let’s hear from you “purists” who would have rather run Angle and lost, than someone else and won. Personally, I shuddered each time both of these nutballs opened their mouths. The results were predictable, Reid could not have hoped for a more flawed opponent than Angle. The folks in Nevada (and I have family there) really wanted Reid gone, but not bad enough to go for Sharron.”

************************************************************

OK, first of all, can you cite for me one thing about Christine O’Donnell that you thought was so “fringe” and “nutty” that made her such a bad candidate in your eyes?

Second, can you name for me a better conservative Republican candidate in Delaware who would have defeated Jim Koons?

Or one who would’ve defeated Harry Reid in the face of the corrupt SEIU union thugs who were put in charge of maintaining and “repairing” all of the electronic voter machines in Nevada?


107 posted on 12/22/2010 10:43:36 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387
In addition, the Tea Party in a couple of instances, put forth candidates who were incapable of keeping their mouths sufficiently shut so as to get themselves elected. Examples include Angle and the loon from Delaware O’Donnell

You are speaking heresy. That is a punishable offense
125 posted on 12/23/2010 10:03:27 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson