Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supremes facing eligibility challenge to Obama, again (It won't go away)
WND ^ | DECEMBER 19, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 12/19/2010 2:31:41 AM PST by RobinMasters

It just doesn't appear to be going away.

The idea that Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, and do chores such as appointing Supreme Court justices, needs to be explored and documented is headed back to the highest court in the land.

According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.

This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: certifigate; illegal; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; scotus; taitz; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: RobinMasters

Do the Supreme Court do split judgements? If the minority were to record that two Judges should have recused themselves because of conflict of interest, and that Obama is not an NBC, that would be sufficient to get the matter decided properly.

They are probably afraid to do it because it might break the judicial process, but the judicial process is corrupted and broken by political appointees already. Better to lose a leg than the whole body to cure the creeping gang-green.


41 posted on 12/19/2010 4:30:43 AM PST by plenipotentiary (Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1
The parent’s citizenship isn’t on the certificate, but a lot of other stuff is...

You are aware that your link is to a Certificate of Live Birth and not a long form Birth Certificate, right?

42 posted on 12/19/2010 4:31:11 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: devere

“To retroactively diqualify the Obama administration at this point in time might cause the U.S. government to collapse.”

It’s well past time for the Government to experience significant change. We must get the government (and the elitists in it) back within the constraints of the Constitution. Limited government was always the plan; part-time legislators always the model.

The fact that we have, today, the leviathan in DC is due to the American sheeple being asleep at the wheel for far too long; and, the slide to socialism started by FDR with the New Deal crappola that spawned the latest farce, 0bama’s Raw Deal. Now we are several generations into an ‘entitlement’ mindset, and the cure will be tough going.

But, we must fix this Nation.


43 posted on 12/19/2010 4:34:01 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; UCFRoadWarrior
I don’t know how the last election affected things, but the lefties have been remarkably successful in electing SoS’s in recent years, with Soros’ money.

Look for stories on what actually happened rather than on what was hoped to happen. His project has been a miserable failure.
44 posted on 12/19/2010 4:36:20 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: devere

Don’t be too sure about that notion of voiding anything he signed... Keep in mind that legislation also involves the Congress. As a mere signatory to the adopted legislation, it may be that the only thing actually voided will be Executive Orders this charlatan has issued.

Either way, it’s an argument I await, anxiously.


45 posted on 12/19/2010 4:38:01 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

You just brought me up to date on the 2010 elections, thanks.

The libs enjoyed a lot more success with SoS’s in ‘06 and ‘08 but those were Dem years, so Soros’ money might not have had as much impact as some think.


46 posted on 12/19/2010 4:41:36 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: saganite

“This issue will go away in 2012 when Obama is defeated. Not before.”

We cannot allow this to simply ‘go away’. I am confident that the global government crowd are quite closely watching the progress of this whole eligibility issue. I am of the mind that their plans and schemes will be shaped by the US PEOPLE’S path and process in chasing the truth in this matter.

They are EXPECTING us to simply drop it...and, we MUST NOT.


47 posted on 12/19/2010 4:42:49 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
(It won't go away)

It will when he does.

48 posted on 12/19/2010 4:47:56 AM PST by Quiller (When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Regardless of the document's title, this an example of a “long form” certificate from the era Obama was born.

Images of both "long" and "short" Hawaiian certificates...

http://www.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&rlz=1R2GGLL_enDE389&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=hawaiian+certificate+of+live+birth&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

49 posted on 12/19/2010 4:50:17 AM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

“The entire citizenry of the country is involved - we all have legal standing!

And, THAT is precisely why none of us have standing, in the slightly twisted logic of the American legal system. Since, in fact, ALL of us are impacted, NONE of us has standing to challenge.

The fine legal minds here on FR can better explain it, but it seems that ‘standing’ has a component of individual, limited particularity that no one has yet been able to prove to the courts that have hosted these suits.


50 posted on 12/19/2010 4:52:05 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

That is pretty twisted, you know. Proof is no good if it isn’t openly presented.


51 posted on 12/19/2010 5:03:13 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
That is pretty twisted, you know. Proof is no good if it isn’t openly presented.

I know, and I do not like it either. But by pleading guilty, Lt. Col. Lakin showed that he agreed with the government's assertion that 0bama is eligible to serve as president and that he was wrong to question that assertion. Even if he wanted to appeal this guilty plea, it is going to be next to impossible to do so.

Had he gone to trial instead, the government would be obligated to show its evidence, and even if the government somehow got out of that obligation, that action too could be appealed.

The way I see it, Lt. Col. Lakin chose to pretty much end his military career by challenging his orders on eligibility grounds. If he was so willing to make himself the test case, then why not at least go all the way and force the government to show its cards?

Copping a plea is only what you do when you know the government can nail your rear end to the wall in court, you want a lenient sentence, and the prosecutor wants an unappealable conviction.

52 posted on 12/19/2010 5:09:09 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The libs enjoyed a lot more success with SoS’s in ‘06 and ‘08 but those were Dem years, so Soros’ money might not have had as much impact as some think.

Soros: crippled in body, mind, and spirit. I want to see that mofo go down. And not in the FMD sense.
53 posted on 12/19/2010 5:16:17 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
"I thought Iowa did this recently."

I haven't heard so. If they have, GREAT! ALL states should have such a written requirement. IMO, they already HAVE the requirement as part of their duties to assure legal elections and legal candidates, and have failed in that duty. That NONE had done so is a significant flaw in our electoral process.

54 posted on 12/19/2010 5:30:52 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
It is sad that so many in talk radio, Fox News, GOP...are supporting Obama on this issue. The release of his long form BC really is not hard to do

--------------------------

Zer0 bamboozled millions... gave us the old 'okee doke.'

55 posted on 12/19/2010 5:38:31 AM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1

It will surface after he is dead


56 posted on 12/19/2010 5:43:13 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I have a question. Are those executive orders blocking the viewing of his college transcripts, COLB etc, void at the end of his presidency? Anybody know for sure?


57 posted on 12/19/2010 6:00:25 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Can you imagine the State-Run media if this was G.W. or any “R” whose eligibility to be POS was in question? We would be seeing reports even today (2-years later) on the PM News and 60 minutes on why needs to be done to affirm Bush’s or any “R”’s eligibility to sit in the Oval Office.


58 posted on 12/19/2010 6:14:56 AM PST by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BobP

The first bogus part of that BC is the fathers race is “African”. “African” is not a race,it’s a continent, and secondly the term used in the 60’s was “Negro” not “African”.


59 posted on 12/19/2010 6:15:10 AM PST by techrules2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I wonder would not Sotomyer and Kagan have to recuse themselves; having been appointed by Obama?


60 posted on 12/19/2010 6:22:22 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again the 3rd day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson