Skip to comments.
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson
Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; bugzapper; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; homosexualagenda; romney; romneysucks; undeadthread; vanity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,181-3,197 next last
To: central_va
1,621
posted on
12/20/2010 4:09:56 AM PST
by
don-o
(Wait. What?)
To: central_va
Sure go ahead, this is a zot thread, maybe something good can come of this. Come into the light Non-sequitur...... I'm sure that after all the times we've crossed swords on Rebellion threads you think you know me by now. So why don't you tell us all what you think I believe.
To: don-o
I am familiar with it, so what did you mean?
1,623
posted on
12/20/2010 4:25:15 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: Jim Robinson
Sorry I’m late... been out of town... Well done Mr. Robinson... well done!
LLS
To: Non-Sequitur
I'm sure that after all the times we've crossed swords on Rebellion threads you think you know me by now. So why don't you tell us all what you think I believe. I will have to turn down you gracious offer. The floor is yours, I will let you give your own explaination(s).
1,625
posted on
12/20/2010 4:28:21 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
I will have to turn down you gracious offer. The floor is yours, I will let you give your own explaination(s). I will say that your fervent desire that the repeal of DADT will weaken the Army enough so that your clown posse can successfully rebel is doomed to disappointment. IMHO, of course.
To: Non-Sequitur
I will say that your fervent desire that the repeal of DADT will weaken the Army enough so that your clown posse can successfully rebel is doomed to disappointment. IMHO, of course. Since you disagree could you answer this, does the repeal of DADT potentially STRENGTHEN the standing Army, if so why?
1,627
posted on
12/20/2010 5:06:24 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Something tells me the next FReepathon isn’t going to go nearly as well as hoped.
1,628
posted on
12/20/2010 5:11:10 AM PST
by
OCCASparky
(Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
To: OCCASparky
Why? There hasn’t been any change in the long-time position of FR on this issue.
1,629
posted on
12/20/2010 5:13:39 AM PST
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: gogeo
“No one is required to tolerate your nonsense, or anyone else’s. To sit in Jim’s virtual living room and lecture him on manners is not only rude, but presumpuous...two traits most definitely not conservative.”
Most of the comments on this entire hate filled thread (beginning with Jim’s own article) are rude and presumptuous and an embarrassment to those of us who call ourselves “Christian”. Some are even a true disgrace to the Creator of the human race.
The ignorant legalism of many posters is plain scary and exhibits a collective mentality by some that truly reeks of past atrocities that should never be repeated.
It may be Jim Robinson’s virtual living room but we ALL have helped pay for him to sit in it a few times over the years.
To: RighteousMomma
Looks like Jim will have another busy day.
1,631
posted on
12/20/2010 5:28:46 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
Since you disagree could you answer this, does the repeal of DADT potentially STRENGTHEN the standing Army, if so why? No. It's a distraction that will cause some issues in the short run. But in the long run the U.S. military will remain the professional organization that is currently is. Much to your dismay, I assume.
To: RighteousMomma
Some are even a true disgrace to the Creator of the human race.Which plants you on the side of the sodomites? Nice.
1,633
posted on
12/20/2010 5:31:31 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: RighteousMomma
The ignorant legalism of many postersExamples, please?
1,634
posted on
12/20/2010 5:33:02 AM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
To: OCCASparky
To: Non-Sequitur
No. It's a distraction that will cause some issues in the short run. But in the long run the U.S. military will remain the professional organization that is currently is. Much to your dismay, I assume. What i think will happen is the draft will HAVE to be re-instated at some point, strengthening the standing Army in the long term. Until then, in the short term, I envision massive amounts of frontline troops not reelisting.
1,636
posted on
12/20/2010 5:39:47 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: RighteousMomma
Most of the comments on this entire hate filled thread (beginning with Jims own article) are rude and presumptuous and an embarrassment to those of us who call ourselves Christian. Where in the Bible does it say to tolerate sin and normalize it?
1,637
posted on
12/20/2010 5:44:32 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
To: RighteousMomma
I didn't see any hate in Jim's posting. Opposing the homosexual agenda does not equal hating individual homosexuals. As a Christian, I am called to love all people including homosexuals. But that same love compels me to oppose their destructive lifestyle. It is not loving to see a man bleeding and tell him, "Good job on the bleeding there! Keep on bleeding!" That is what today's culture is telling us to do in the name of "Tolerance."
Homosexual behavior is killing homosexuals and their political agenda is pulling everybody down with them. Some people on this thread are showing un-Christian attitudes, but I did not see that in Jim's posting.
1,638
posted on
12/20/2010 5:45:27 AM PST
by
Drawsing
(The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
To: Drawsing
I smell ozone in her future.
1,639
posted on
12/20/2010 5:50:37 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
Comment #1,640 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,181-3,197 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson