Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Oh yes their is. The United States Armed Forces basically enjoys NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. If you think I'm making this up I'm not. The United States Military is under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice which has it's on laws and codes. These laws and codes are set by congress.
A soldier who let's say robs a store and is put away 5-10 for armed robbery can get that and more afterward by the military for that exact same crime. He can even be charged for desertion while in a civilian prison.
The UCMJ is not a touchy feely PC set or rules and laws designed to make you happy. They are written for the best interest of the United States Armed Forces and our National Defense. Your rights under the Constitution do not in effect exist while you are a member of the armed forces.
Grab another cup of coffee and put your zot hat on,
it’s gonna be a busy day. The freeks are out in force.
Several have already self-zotted and opused out.
Thank you for your service, but you have NO obligation to defend yourself to him.
every word you wrote I agree with pal, well said.
I am not a liberal but if the belief that all men are created equal and afforded equal protection for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is a liberal ideal then the founding fathers are liberal as well as I and I am happy to be counted among those souls.
If you are going to ZOT me then ZOT me, daddy and zot my wife (repogirl) as well who thinks the same way.
Re-reading the comment, I see that the emphasis might well have been intended to be on a condemnation of their actions (fair enough) and not on the issue of their humanity. If I misread that, my apologies; it was not my intention to deceive.
Assuming this to be true though, you may also wish to consider that not all homosexuals behave like barnyard animals. The truth is that too many do just that, egged on by the worst and most perverse influences among them. But there are many others who choose differently, for reasons of health and yes, morality.
That's pretty sick...did someone say that in this thread?
This is how these people think. Like I keep on saying, they have no clue what is really at stake because they have never served, nor do they understand the rules.
They relate everything to their moderate gray little world, where everything is open to change or debate.
In this case, only a true Veteran can understand the finality of this issue.
there is nothing in the constitution which say homosexuals should be serving and if you think the founding fathers wanted homosexuality in the military or them to married then you must be high as a kite
Not really, they are both sexual orientations. Same as bestiality and pedophilia over the age of 12 like in the Nederlands. And why should you care about genetics, haven't you heard of safe sex or abortion? It's none of your business anyway when it comes to the 14th amendment. So your 14th amendment argument is worthless when comes to discriminating on a behavioral basis isn't it?"
Still, using your logic, would support same sex consensual incest since there is no genetic problems, can the military discriminate against that?
I don't have any interest in admonishing the poster for what he said. Why do you?
*****
I was not admonishing the poster for what he said. Outside of controlled environments like the military, courtrooms or the workplace, people can use whatever terms they prefer. It's a freedom of speech thing.
I was just curious as to how he knew "thousands" of them. That is all.
I figured that he works either in public health or in law enforcement.
Thinking about it, it was probably just a figure of speech that he used. Like "I've told you a million times...".
Anyways, since he has not answered by now he has either probably been busy or figures my comment does not deserve an answer. Either of which is ok with me.
No response can be an answer.
Great post.
Jim,
I supported your position yesterday and continue to support it today.
Frankly, I find it hard to understand those who have been members for 5 to 10 years not having a good understanding of the FR mission.
You know nothing on how combat units work, how we look at things , how we live, how we train so until you do then find out, serve and then come back instead of pushing yuour pro homo crap.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Excellent answer, BUT completely over the head of (most) the never served crowd.
Now you will get a bunch of ‘don’t tell me I can’t comment just because I have never served’, which, for the most part, is the talking point for when one doesn’t know WTF one is talking about.
Heard a good line a while back in regards to abortion. (same gist).
“Ever notice that those pushing abortions never admit they were lucky their mother didn’t have the same beliefs”?
That is how the left works, you give protected group A special privileges for political reasons. If you are against that then you are a Nazi and want to kill them all.
All men are indeed created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; among these are the rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
When a crackpot dictatorial government misuses its power to FORCE a sexual perversion on an unwilling society, that is NOT Liberty, it is tyranny!!
Government force in this manner is unconstitutional!
There will be a day of reckoning.
You might google "Folsom Street fair" if you are not convinced. These "fairs" not only include the "performers" but many, many who are there as an "audience".
does it give rights to sex with animals, having 9 wives, incest?
You’ve never served, have no clue about how it works and yet you then say the constitution says they can serve because the amendment says protection for all.
Well with your view then it gives protection to everything.
You know damn well that if the founding fathers though homosexuals were going to run around rampant they would have wrote about marriage, military etc banning them.
They’re rolling in their graves and for you to say you are not pushing the queer agenda is dishonest and you know that too.
I’m surprised Jim has not banned you bu then again maybe it is because he as we all do think you have no argument to your agenda on here and that you’re embarrassing yourself by repeating the same old lefts comments.
Homosexuals have been recruited into the radical left.
They are foot soliders for the Marxists-Progressives just like Hitler’s brownshirted bullies called the SA, also led by a “gay” man named Ernst Rohm.
The dialectic is being put into play with gays as “victims” and “the oppressed” and the Left wins in so many ways with this issue.
They anger people who believe in traditional values and live traditional lifestyles, creating conflict. They drive conservative minded, traditional values people from the military.
This DADT repeal is the undermining and purging of our miltary to put in more “politically reliable” elements...
No one is FORCING gays to join the military, they are only saying that they CAN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.