Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP’S CHANCES TO UNSEAT BOB CASEY? GOOD LUCK
Philadelphia Magazine ^ | 14 Dec 2010 | Chris Freind

Posted on 12/14/2010 3:26:01 PM PST by grace522

You would think that with Pennsylvania’s Republican roots, which have run especially deep over the last several decades, freshman Democratic senator Bob Casey would be vulnerable in 2012.

You would be wrong, and the reason is simple civics. Incumbents don’t lose unless they’re challenged by viable, first-tier candidates, as the Senate elections in Nevada and Alaska proved. And, as of now, there are none to challenge Casey. Whether that changes in the next year is anyone’s guess, but the mere fact that the GOP finds itself in this position speaks volumes about how it builds its “bench.” Translation: it doesn’t.

*****

Pennsylvania’s Republican power was on full display when Ronald Reagan chose three cabinet officials not just from the same state, but the same county! Montgomery County produced Drew Lewis (who fired the striking air traffic controllers), Alexander Haig, and Richard Schweiker. Since then, it’s been all downhill for the Montco GOP, with infighting and strife resulting in minority status in the state’s third largest county.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.phillymag.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: casey; corbett; pa2012; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: randita
Jake Corman? I don't think so - he's my state senator, and too rino for me. He doesn't seem to understand that property rights are fundamental to our economic system. If I see him this year doing things like defunding DCNR-DEP, or at least restraining their regulatory ability to shut down business (and other uses of private property), then maybe I'll reconsider.
41 posted on 12/14/2010 9:04:41 PM PST by Kay Ludlow (Government actions ALWAYS have unintended consequences...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
"PA GOP has been bad at registering new voters and that has turned Montgomery County competitive for the Dems where it used to be solid GOP country."

We've also had some significant demographic changes in Montco. The population of upscale liberals has grown quite a bit in recent years. I think the Montco GOP has shed quite a bit of its complacency recently. It's not an easy county for us. Plenty of work to be done.

42 posted on 12/14/2010 9:06:13 PM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
"Does Bob Casey do Townhall Meetings? Has he ever done one? I don’t think so and the reason is simple: He’s as dumb as a box of rocks."

I had occasion to speak with Sen Casey while in DC at one of our 2009 protests. I found it rather disturbing. He repeated talking points and platitudes and would not engage in anything resembling conversation. To his credit, he can speak in complete sentences without using a teleprompter, but he doesn't come across as having any independent thoughts or forming conclusions based on any sort of analysis. He had nice shiny shoes and a nice suit though . . . he looked the part.

43 posted on 12/14/2010 9:12:04 PM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: grace522

Pro-lifers need to check out Casey’s “pro-life” record. Not so great for someone who claims to be pro-life.


44 posted on 12/14/2010 9:46:00 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill
Actually, oldbill, Mr. Friend's position on most issues are conservative.

Like many writers he is given to sensationalize some issues and also tends to be too negative.

However, he is correct. Unseating Casey will not prove easy, as conservatives who voted for Santorum against Casey (despite their anger with him) warned, and will likely require a first tier candidate.

Unfortunately, the two examples you gave to disprove Mr. Friend's point, aren't persuasive.

Conservatives helped Casey beat Santorum. Had Casey ran as a pro-choicer instead of a pro-lifer, Santorum would in all probability, be in office today. Specter horribly weakened his own strength by his change of party and his challenger Sestak WAS a viable, first-tier candidate.

45 posted on 12/15/2010 6:08:39 AM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: grace522
"The PA GOP had a big win in Nov due primarily because of the Tea Party and other grassroots organizations."

During a recent panel discussion, Tea Party organizers unanimously agreed, the Republican Party would have won without the Tea Party, but the win wouldn't have been as big, a fairer and more accurate assessment.

46 posted on 12/15/2010 6:13:23 AM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Casey’s vote FOR Obamacare, is one of the “blotches” on his pro-life record and one of the many negative consequences of conservative support for his candidacy over Santorum’s. It is unlikely, most of those conservatives, would ever admit to to their error.


47 posted on 12/15/2010 6:22:01 AM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Think free or die
I'm curious as to how you got an audience with Bob Casey, Jr. Was it one on one, or were you part of a group which was perceived as friendly by his handlers?

I notice that whenever he travels in the Commonwealth, his handlers are careful to ensure that he doesn't interact with average citizens, at least beyond the photo-ops and superficial pleasantries.

I'd be surprised if it was any different in DC. For all Specter's faults, I do give him credit for not being afraid of his constituents.

48 posted on 12/15/2010 8:44:26 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
Toomey could not have won without the TEA Party support. The margin was a lot narrower than it should have been. In large part because the ass-hat GOP chair Gleason tried relentlessly to recruit a name candidate to run against Toomey and wrote him off in the beginning as too conservative to be electable.
49 posted on 12/15/2010 8:49:49 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
The comment was a statement on the victory of the Republican Party in general. Without the Tea Party Movement, it would have been big, not as big, a general consensus among Tea Party organizers on a recent local panel, which is a more accurate statement.

Toomey may have been one of the losses incurred without the Tea Party and John Runyan, in NJ, may have been another.

Another point to consider regarding the power of the Tea Party, is most of the "Tea Party" candidates supported by most Tea Party groups across the country, lost in the primary. That should change as the movement becomes more politically mature.

It's important to avoid over or under-estimating the Tea Party influence, in order to set more realistic goals, and operate more effectively, IMHO.

50 posted on 12/15/2010 9:50:44 AM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
"I'm curious as to how you got an audience with Bob Casey, Jr. Was it one on one, or were you part of a group which was perceived as friendly by his handlers?"

I was in DC for a rally - I think it was 11/5/09. Many of us set off individually or in small groups to find our legislators to talk to them about their votes on Obamacare. Sen. Casey managed not to be in his office when citizens came calling. However, he was spotted walking outside and several of us took the opportunity to speak with him. He didn't have any "handlers" with him. There were about 12-15 people who had the opportunity to speak with him like this, of which a handful spoke up individually. I was able to look him in the eye and hold his attention for about 5 minutes before he found something compelling that needed his attention - perhaps lunch.

Several of us spoke up for the unborn, and I related to him some of my family's experiences with tyranny in the former Eastern Bloc. He couldn't or wouldn't see the connection between the massive statism he supports and the loss of freedom that results.

51 posted on 12/15/2010 11:21:04 AM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
"Toomey could not have won without the TEA Party support."

I tend to agree, based on what I saw in my own township. Bear in mind that Tea Party folks have been joining the ranks of local GOP committees, trying to work from within . . .

52 posted on 12/15/2010 11:25:39 AM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Think free or die
Thanks for sharing your experience.

There was a joke going around on our local talk show shortly after Casey, Jr. endorsed Obama that maybe Obama could find Osama Bin Laden now that he found Bob Casey, Jr.

53 posted on 12/15/2010 11:27:30 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

Congressman Lou Barletta!


54 posted on 12/15/2010 11:39:11 AM PST by Palladin (Stand and fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grace522

Remember the cardinal rule of the left when it needs to oppose something they simply infiltrate it and take it over. The left long ago started to infiltrate the GOP as they have every other institution. We simply have to infiltrate it back and throw whoever is in charge right now out. As a matter of fact we should be doing the same to the democrats. Infiltrate their party and take it down from within.


55 posted on 12/15/2010 2:05:05 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

“Congressman Lou Barletta!”
I’ll second that Palladin. I think he’d clean Casey’s clock.


56 posted on 12/15/2010 3:27:36 PM PST by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Let’s not let them infiltrate the tea party.


57 posted on 12/15/2010 3:29:28 PM PST by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: cork

Casey, Bob Casey, I seem to recall the name.... Yeah, the guy that recently introduced legislation to confiscate our 401K’s, IRA’s and 503’s. Other than that I think he has been AWOL.


58 posted on 12/15/2010 3:44:54 PM PST by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

I don’t know Tim Murphy but I trust YOU PM.

Santorum is an actor, and no RR.


59 posted on 12/15/2010 5:01:43 PM PST by HonestConservative (http://www.freedomradiorocks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Don’t forget Allen West and Renee Ellmers!


60 posted on 12/15/2010 5:03:16 PM PST by HonestConservative (http://www.freedomradiorocks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson