During a recent panel discussion, Tea Party organizers unanimously agreed, the Republican Party would have won without the Tea Party, but the win wouldn't have been as big, a fairer and more accurate assessment.
Horse Hockey.
There was no such agreement. I was there. You personally may have agreed with him, but there was no unanimous vote or agreement to that.
Mr. Friend put that out there as a statement made by a lib he debated with on TV, which he failed to challenge.
The very existence of that meeting who’s stated purpose was to attempt to influence Tea Party’s is evidence of the R’s FEAR of the power of the Tea Party, movement.
If the Tea Parties were not responsible for the take overs, then why bother?