Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grace522
"The PA GOP had a big win in Nov due primarily because of the Tea Party and other grassroots organizations."

During a recent panel discussion, Tea Party organizers unanimously agreed, the Republican Party would have won without the Tea Party, but the win wouldn't have been as big, a fairer and more accurate assessment.

46 posted on 12/15/2010 6:13:23 AM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
Toomey could not have won without the TEA Party support. The margin was a lot narrower than it should have been. In large part because the ass-hat GOP chair Gleason tried relentlessly to recruit a name candidate to run against Toomey and wrote him off in the beginning as too conservative to be electable.
49 posted on 12/15/2010 8:49:49 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: TAdams8591; PennsylvaniaMom

Horse Hockey.

There was no such agreement. I was there. You personally may have agreed with him, but there was no unanimous vote or agreement to that.

Mr. Friend put that out there as a statement made by a lib he debated with on TV, which he failed to challenge.

The very existence of that meeting who’s stated purpose was to attempt to influence Tea Party’s is evidence of the R’s FEAR of the power of the Tea Party, movement.

If the Tea Parties were not responsible for the take overs, then why bother?


62 posted on 12/15/2010 5:18:39 PM PST by HonestConservative (http://www.freedomradiorocks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson