Leaks? What leaks?
I’m surprised to see this in The Guardian.
Yes. The sooner we get rid of Obama and his cohorts the better.
This administration is unresponsive, is right.
Whether Obummer allows the release of documents or not, his administration reviewed and had the relevant parts redacted according to their concerns so the releasing of documents was no surprise to this administration.
Why isn’t Hillary on the chopping block? No repercussion for any US officials involved and their exposed actions along with their way of doing business? (tin-foil hat time)
This brings a total loss and lack of confidence in dealing with this US administration and its minions as they were instructed to collect gossip and usable evidence to influence agreements at a later date.
Why would any country want to deal with a bunch of backstabbers that go unpunished?
As far as criticism goes to even releasing these documents, people always want proof of inter-dealing but now it’s information overload with more to come esp. on banks.
Your elected officials at work appointing a bunch of losers, at best, to carry out policy.
Still waiting for that answer and question period after a news conference for excuses to who and wherefore.
Leaks? What leaks?
Bolton is every bit as dangerous as Obama, a neocon of the highest order.
0bama gets to go a party every other night, and on vacation every other week.
He doesn’t have time to actually...govern. Might interrupt his golf game.
Pow! that landed square on Obama’s nose!
Palin/Bolton 2012
The article says the dept of Justice is looking into the leaks. So far they only seem to be looking for the guy who runs WikiLeaks.
Shouldn’t Justice and some Congressional committee be going after how these files got out, who was involved on both ends of the leak and why our secret files were so poorly guarded and who was supposed to guard the secrets? Some blame has to fall on the present administration.
Thanks for this link.