Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea fires artillery towards S. Korean island, official says (houses destroyed, fire broke out)
Yonhap News ^ | 11/23/10

Posted on 11/22/2010 10:44:16 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

N. Korea fires artillery towards S. Korean island, official says

SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) -- North Korea on Tuesday fired several rounds of artillery towards South Korean waters and an island near the tense west sea border, the South's military said.

The North's artillery shells fell at 2:34 p.m. in the South's waters off the island of Yeonpyeong, some of them landing directly on the island, said Col. Lee Bung-woo, spokesman at the South's Joint Chiefs of Staff. The South's military responded with its artillery firing.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.yonhapnews.co.kr ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artillery; dmz; dprk; fires; foreignpolicy; island; korea; koreanwar; nkorea; northkorea; shelling; skorea; southkorea; war; yeonpyeong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-575 next last
To: jhpigott

LMAO! Obama is not going to do ANYTHING about it. Rest assure on that.


321 posted on 11/23/2010 7:06:46 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

It was Robin Williams:

“Cross this line you die. [Step back a foot and draw another line.] Cross this line you die. [Step back, draw another line.] Cross THIS line you die.....”

“All right that’s it, you come a-knocking on my door, I’m not a-coming out...Nyaah!”


322 posted on 11/23/2010 7:07:10 AM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

+1

And better to do it on our (ROK/US) sooner rather than later. Otherwise these NORK provocations are just going to come more frequently and more robustly.


323 posted on 11/23/2010 7:07:58 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmm, I wonder if and how many Paladin self propelled howitzers we have there in SK, I’m a tanker hobbyist and the Paladin to me with its “time to target” firing can lob I think as many as 6 shells at different angles, and through the difference of angles and speed all hit at the same time.


324 posted on 11/23/2010 7:08:20 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
South Korea will react strongly if more strikes: Govt adviser

LONDON: Seoul wants to avoid worsening tensions after North Korean artillery attacked a South Korean island on Tuesday but would react "much harder" militarily if the strikes escalated, a South Korean government adviser said.

Chung Min Lee, an ambassador-level foreign ministry expert who advises the government on security, told Reuters in a telephone interview he did not see the situation escalating into war but South Korea's stance would change if matters worsened.

Asked if he agree with a remark by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov that there was a 'colossal danger' of an escalation in fighting on the Korean peninsula, he replied: "It all depends on what further provocations North Korea chooses to mount.

"I don't foresee this escalating into major war on the peninsula, but if North Korea decides they want to push us a little bit further back by additional attacks on our territory, then we will respond militarily, including the possibility of taking out their artillery sites with our aircraft.

325 posted on 11/23/2010 7:09:14 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

You mentioned Gen. MacArthur. My recollection is that he would have taken care of the job except for being overruled by his Democratic CIC...is this not right?


326 posted on 11/23/2010 7:10:27 AM PST by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

I suppose there is more than enough asset to vaporize artillery sites responsible for today’s attack.


327 posted on 11/23/2010 7:10:27 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I have old classmates in S. Korea, might try to look them up again. See what their take is.


328 posted on 11/23/2010 7:10:50 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: jennings2004

You are correct, sir.


329 posted on 11/23/2010 7:11:17 AM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
신은 그의 한국 사람들을 강복하고 사랑한다. 나는 Philistines 같이 눈의 가시 대 계속 이스라엘인 이 나쁜 국가 상공에 승리를 위해 간절히 바란다. 필요의 그들의 시간에 있는 우리의 한국 사촌을 제외하고 O 주.

Basically a prayer to our South Korean cousins, so loving, such a big Christian nation. I pray God will protect her in these perilous times. Too many flare ups through out the world for wars not to spring up elsewhere emboldened by this craziness.

330 posted on 11/23/2010 7:13:50 AM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Tiger likes rooster: I do not understand the transliteration of the Korean word,”staring.” Is this a usage of observation or a higher more “focused” staring? My Korean is not so good.


331 posted on 11/23/2010 7:16:06 AM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
Video of some artillery rounds falling
332 posted on 11/23/2010 7:16:48 AM PST by ZX12R (IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
China does not want the US on its border. They will act to bail out N. Korea if it comes to war.

To be honest I doubt the US has the resources to fight on the Korean peninsula right now. Spread to thing, and our material is breaking down.

333 posted on 11/23/2010 7:17:27 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: jennings2004

Don’t forget that McArthur managed to be completely surprised by the Chinese intervention, despite numerous warnings, thus getting thousands of Americans killed.

Of course following the pattern set in World War II, when his Air Force in the Phillipines was destroyed on the ground hours AFTER Pearl Harbor.

Most overrrated General in U.S. history.


334 posted on 11/23/2010 7:18:34 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

North Korea is a thorn in China’s side, if there was an easy way to get rid of the problem, the Chinese would do it. Their nightmare is to have millions of NoKo refugees streaming into China.

South Korea is in the same predicament as well, if they somehow beat NoKo, then they will have their own issues with refugees.

Eventually South Korea and China will have to become partners to solve the North Korea problem.


335 posted on 11/23/2010 7:21:32 AM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: jennings2004

yeah, he wanted to nuke the area around the Yalu, to stop the Chinese.

Truman ordered him not to. He also ordered him to shut his mouth

Mac, in effect, flipped him off.

Think Patreaous (sp?) telling off the President, in public.

Mac got fired. I had several relatives in the Pacific during WWII and Korea. None of them like Mac. The ones in Europe thought their commanders could walk on water.


336 posted on 11/23/2010 7:21:33 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Don't taze my junk bro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

Wow. That one guy was running the wrong way. Glad he made it okay. How can you tell where that artillery is gonna land ? Or can you ?


337 posted on 11/23/2010 7:22:57 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Karliner

probably “focused staring”


338 posted on 11/23/2010 7:24:03 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
"Don’t see how this is any bigger of a deal than the ship they sank. Nobody cared then - will they care now?"

Probably for two reasons - Civilian involvement, and Korea no longer has any plausible deniability. Remember, it was weeks before SK asserted in was probably a NK torpedo. This, OTOH is immediately identifiable and undeniably an unprovoked military attack resulting in civilian causalities.

I'm not sure how they ignore this, and maintain any credibility with their own people, let alone North Korea, moving forward.

339 posted on 11/23/2010 7:24:47 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

(2nd LD) China keeps terse following N. Korea’s attack on S. Korea
(ATTN: UPDATES with results of diplomats’ meeting in Seoul; ADDS Bosworth’s comments)
By Sam Kim and Lee Haye-ah
SEOUL, Nov. 23 (Yonhap) — In a meeting with South Korea’s foreign minister on Tuesday, the top Chinese envoy in Seoul refrained from elaborating on his country’s position concerning a North Korean artillery attack that killed two South Korean marines, an official here said.

The dearth of words from Zhang Xinsen appeared to underscore the difficulties China faces in dealing with the aftermath of the indiscriminate attack its communist ally launched earlier Tuesday.

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/201....

- - Chinese foreign ministry dropping the ball with this one? No response likely means either the Chinese weren’t aware this was coming and are trying to formulate a response OR they are purposefully keeping quiet for some unknown (but can’t be good) reason. Either way - bad mojo IMO - -


340 posted on 11/23/2010 7:28:08 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-575 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson