Posted on 11/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST by rxsid
No. 10-446
Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: (09-4209)
Decision Date: July 2, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.
Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010
Attorney Apuzzo's blog: http://puzo1.blogspot.com
To expand on the March 2007 Appropriation's hearing, I could only see the "good-natured banter" coming from Justice Thomas that he was smiling like a Cheshire cat and maybe let out a chuckle when Serrano brought up the issue of presidential eligibility for Puerto Ricans. I saw or heard no bantering from Congressman Serrano who seemed to deadpan his remarks. You can speculate to why Thomas was smiling.
“Says Pilsner, who’s waiting for heads to explode because he authored a post on a Birther thread that isn’t witheringly anti Birther. “
We’ll let this one slide. But don’t let it happen again.
Hey, if this is your first post on a “birther” thread that isn’t witheringly “anti-birther” then how about a round of drinks on me? lol. Much better than exploding heads. It’s at least good to agree whenever we CAN.
Oh yeah, I know all the troll players here, especially this Soros puppet.
You can bet your bottom dollar that Harry Reid cheated to win.
No comprehendo. This is what I found at that link
Gingrich’s ‘Monica’
By Joseph Farah
© 2010 WorldNetDaily.com
Big deal. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has a girlfriend.
Suddenly, we’re supposed to believe, the nation cares about such things. Now the press has an obligation to expose the intimate details of public officials’ “private lives.”
Personally, I couldn’t give a darn.
After all, Gingrich is the ex-speaker, not the current speaker. There are no allegations he raped anyone. I guess about the worst thing you could say is that he was a no-good louse of a husband.
I sympathize with the two Mrs. Gingriches. But is this really a matter of national ....
http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/EvadingTheIssue.htm
Maybe this one will take you to the right place.
I see everyone else saying it was just a joke the way Justice Thomas made his comment, but I think that is the way one Justice chides that others about something he believes they are missing the boat on.
I dont know if there are four votes to hear this issue but there is definitely at least one vote to hear it and decide who has standing, what does Natural Born mean and who is the proper decision maker when it comes to eligibility for President
I'll repeat. None have been heard by the court so none have involved the Solicitor General. What you posted was the filing that will be going to conference and which, if past history is any judge, will get no further.
There has not been one single recorded dissent from any of the denials of certiorari in any of the prior eligibility cases. We will see what happens this time, but I predict, once again, a denial of cert. with no dissents.
None of the Supreme Court Justices appointed by Richard Nixon recused themselves from hearing the Watergate tapes case, United States v. Nixon, which was decided unanimously against Nixon and led to his resignation.
"The show host advises that a podcast of this radio show should be available after about 4 p.m. EST on 10 Oct 2010 at this link. Scroll down to see a list of podcasts of prior shows by Jim 'Howie' Mandel, Jr.: http://www.latalkradio.com/Mandel.php"
From: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-howie.html
According to the Supreme Court 2003..Vattel’s Law of Nations is affirmed to be domestic law.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2625035/posts
A statutory citizen can never be considered a “natural born” citizen.
A “natural born” citizen just is, and requires no statute, law or constitutional amendment to make him/her so.
ALL statutory citizens are born with a first generation tie to another nation by birthplace and/or blood, but NEVER is that the case with any natural born citizens who are only American.
I posted:
“Serrano noted Thomas being OK with somebody becoming a SCOTUS justice who had never been a judge (which applied to Sotomayor) and Thomas added that a person doesn’t have to be born in the US either, to be a SCOTUS justice (which also applied to Sotomayor).”
It has been pointed out to me that Sotomayor was born in the US. So I apologize for the error.
That makes it stand out a bit more that Thomas brought up the birthplace then. Somewhat out of the blue, that comment.
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1lGFYYNkw_o/TOF41txcOsI/AAAAAAAACJE/Tj1LKVwggyc/s400/president-obama-and-lingle.JPG")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.