Posted on 11/03/2010 7:06:56 PM PDT by Qbert
Long-simmering tensions within the Republican Party spilled into public view Wednesday as the pragmatic and conservative wings of the GOP blamed each other in blunt terms for the party’s failure to capture the Senate.
With tea party-backed candidates going down in Delaware, Colorado and Nevada, depriving Republicans of what would have been a 50-50 Senate, a bloc of prominent senators and operatives said party purists like Sarah Palin and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) had foolishly pushed nominees too conservative to win in politically competitive states.
Movement conservatives pointed the finger right back at the establishment, accusing the National Republican Senatorial Committee of squandering millions on a California race that wasn’t close at the expense of offering additional aid in places like Colorado, Nevada and Washington state, where Democratic Sen. Patty Murray holds a narrow lead as the votes continue to be counted.
The back-and-forth following an otherwise triumphant election amounted to a significant ratcheting up of the internecine battle that has been taking place within the GOP for the past year.
“Candidates matter,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “It was a good night for Republicans but it could have been a better one. We left some on the table.”
Referring to the debate within the right about whether the party was better off losing the Delaware seat than winning with a moderate Republican like Rep. Mike Castle, who lost the GOP primary to Christine O’Donnell, Graham was even more blunt.
“If you think what happened in Delaware is ‘a win’ for the Republican Party then we don’t have a snowball’s chance to win the White House,” he said. “If you think Delaware was a wake-up call for Republicans than we have shot at doing well for a long time.”
Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott put it plainly: “We did not nominate our strongest candidates.”
Had Republicans run Castle in Delaware and establishment favorites Sue Lowden in Nevada and Jane Norton in Colorado, Lott said, Tuesday would have turned out different.
“With those three we would have won and been sitting at 50 [senators],” he observed.
Another high-profile senator went even further, placing the blame for the Senate GOP’s failure squarely at the feet of Graham’s South Carolina colleague, DeMint.
This Republican senator said that the tea party was the “big winner” by helping bring enormous energy behind GOP candidates Tuesday, but he said that “Sen. DeMint was the big loser.”
“It’s like you’re on the five-yard line ready to score and the quarterback calls the play and some member of your team tackles one of your members and keeps you from scoring,” the senator said. “We came tantalizingly close to a majority.”
“I’m completely mystified by it,” the senator said of DeMint’s tactics.
The senator credited House Speaker-in-waiting John Boehner for keeping House Republicans unified behind a common purpose but he said that DeMint took a selfish path that hurt the party’s common cause.
“In the Senate, we had one senator, with almost no following within the caucus, engaged in DeMint-style tactics and kept us from realizing our potential,” the senator said.
The South Carolina conservative endorsed O’Donnell and Buck in the primary but only got behind Angle after she won the nomination. All told, he raised over $7 million for GOP candidates, more than any other senator.
DeMint aides declined to make the senator available for an interview, but depicted Republican leaders as accommodationists while touting the senators who won that they endorsed.
“We’re very proud of the conservative leaders who won their races yesterday,” said Matt Hoskins, a DeMint aide. “Many of these candidates were initially opposed by the Washington establishment yet they prevailed because they had the courage to stand up for conservative principles. At least five new Republicans will be in the Senate next year who will hold Washington accountable by standing up to the big spenders in both political parties.”
DeMint got behind newly-elected GOP senators Pat Toomey (Penn.), Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.), Mike Lee (Utah) and Ron Johnson (Wisc.) in primaries even as party officials had varying degrees of skepticism about their general election prospects.
Sources close to DeMint also sought to rebut the criticism they’re taking for their role in pushing conservative candidates by pinning the blame instead on the NRSC’s spending decisions.
“If the establishment is doing finger-pointing this morning it’s because their $8 million gamble in California didn’t pay off,” jabbed a source close to DeMint. “That money could have been used in Colorado, Nevada, Washington and Alaska where the races were much looser and much more winnable. That was a huge fumble.”
Republican Carly Fiorina lost by about 10 percentage points to Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer in California.
NRSC Chairman John Cornyn, while declining to publicly criticize DeMint, defended the decision to spend money in the Golden State, saying she was the best Republican candidate the party could have fielded in a good year for the GOP. “But in deep-blue California that wasn’t quite enough,” Cornyn said on a conference call with reporters, noting that Democrats also spent considerable sums trying to snatch such long-shots as Missouri and Kentucky from Republicans.
As for Colorado, Cornyn came prepared, noting that the committee had spent $6.2 million there. In the case of Nevada, he pointed out that Angle raised record sums for her own bid. An NRSC official noted that the third-party group American Crossroads put in considerable sums into both states.
DeMint’s actions have enraged many Republican senators, aides and consultants, many of whom were exchanging cutting emails about him late Tuesday and early Wednesday as it became clear the party would fall short in the Senate.
“I’m glad Jim DeMint is serving as the loyal opposition within our party,” quipped Julie Wadler, a GOP fundraiser and strategist, capturing the contempt held by many Beltway Republicans for the South Carolinian.
But the blame over who lost the Senate isn’t just taking place within Washington. It’s now the turf on which a more fundamental debate within the conservative movement is taking place. It’s a familiar purity vs. pragmatism battle that has been raging since the GOP lost its majority status in the Senate.
Rush Limbaugh, taking issue with a statement Karl Rove made Tuesday night about the “lesson” learned in nominating O’Donnell, argued that both Angle and O’Donnell lost because they were abandoned by party elites.
“Christine O'Donnell could have won were it not for all the backbiting after her primary victory,” Limbaugh said on his radio show Wednesday. “Had the party gotten behind her, had [RNC Chairman Michael] Steele had some on-the-ground money for Nevada, who knows how that might have turned out. We didn't have any money on the ground in Nevada.”
Both O’Donnell and Angle actually raised significant sums of money and the latter got millions of dollars in assistance from third-party conservative groups, including cash that went to voter turnout efforts.
Mike Duncan, the former RNC Chairman who heads American Crossroads, noted that his well-funded organization spent millions on Angle, Paul and Buck.
But, citing his fellow Kentuckian’s triumph, Duncan said: “Obviously some candidates are more skilled than other candidates.”
Graham said the problem with such candidates was not that they didn’t get enough financial assistance, but that they ran campaigns outside the mainstream of states that favor candidates closer to the political middle.
“Hard-right politicians in purple states didn’t turn out very well,” he said. “Candidates who embraced center-right politics in purple states did very well.
Crowing about the large group of more mainline Republicans coming into the Senate such as Ohio’s Rob Portman and Illinois’s Mark Kirk, Graham said: “The solving-the-problem crowd in the Senate grew on Tuesday.”
Other Senate Republicans who bridge the two wings of the party sought to tamp down the anger Wednesday.
“We didn’t have the “A” candidates for this election, but how many election cycles do you have that?” asked Sen. Richard Burr (N.C.). “You got to play the hand you’re dealt.”
Still, even with the election over now, there is little doubt that the fight within the party will continue. Now joined by the likes of Lee and Paul, DeMint is likely to be emboldened to continue his guerilla tactics.
He wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed Wednesday that read like a combative welcome manual to new GOP senators: “Tea party Republicans were elected to go to Washington and save the country—not be co-opted by the club. So put on your boxing gloves. The fight begins today.”
That was a freakin'longshot, PolitiHO's.
Never mind the 100's of Congressional and State wins, kthxbai.
“So you think you can just keep on nominating more Sharon Angles and Christine O’Donnells in the blue and purple states?”
Absolutely. And it’s not a recipe for obliteration; it’s a recipe for an America where anyone to the left of Rush Limbaugh is seen as a ridiculous, lunatic-fringe moonbat...which, after all, is only accurate.
Sorry to point thisout to you but you are wrong concerning McCain and Graham, they do get it. You are the one that doesn’t get it.
They are socialists that happen to be in the republican party and are just as eager to advance the socialist agenda as most in the democrat party, just at a slower pace.
So when you GET IT you will understand a lot more then wha tyou currently do at this point.
Absolutely! Thanks for replying to my ping to you.
Oh, I think we SHOULD unify to fight for the nominees. I’ve witnessed conservatives doing just that for decades in order to elect squishy moderates. Millions of us even went so far as to vote for McCain in 2008. Now THAT is what I call taking one for the team!
Now we know the RINOs will not respond in kind. The sides were laid bare in this election. Hidden agendas were revealed for all to see! Democrats are statists, and RINOs are Democrat quislings. BOTH are enemies of smaller government and must be opposed by liberty loving Americans.
“Toomey’s margins as well.”
A THIN win is still a win. Florina and Whitman were Ruling Class Nominee’s. They didn’t fare very well either. I wish all GOP nominee’s would have won.
The fact is no party win’s every race. Are some nominee’s better than others, of course.
My advice to Lindsey and the RINO’s is get used to more primary challengers, because more are coming in 2012.
“Republicans”—and I use that term lightly wouldn’t even had won the House without the Tea Parties. The good ole boy network would never had initiated enthusiasm for change since they are part of the problem.
Jim DeMint is Awesome! What would the point of winning the Senate have been if it was filled with RINO’s who would go running across the aisle at every chance like McLame and Grahamnesty? My major anger is at the Establishment GOP types who refuse to support people like O’Donnell....
To me it’s like we called up some rookies from the minors because the old timers were not there to win and were just throwing the game.
These new faces had to be in there. But next time up, we will have some more seasoned choices, in their prime.
I don’t get what is wrong with these guys. We just had the biggest R sweep in my lifetime. You cannot tell me that the tea party were not part of that driving force. I know several people personally who followed and hung on every word from people like DeMint because he “gets the average person, even those who never cared about politics before. Grahmn and his ilk have done nothing to inspire or bring new life, or new votes, to the party.
Politico = pure bullsh*t.
“So you think you can just keep on nominating more Sharon Angles and Christine O’Donnells in the blue and purple states?”
Florina and Whitman are as “Moderate” as you can get.
Last I checked, they did not fare any better than COD and Angle.
We didnt push candidates that were too Conservative, The Republican leaders let them down. They even attacked them, They allowed Murcowski to keep her assignments, No It wasn’t the fault of dement, it was the fault of Republican leadership.
Lyndsey Graham can KMA.
“Unfortunately Graham was reelected in 2008 so he won’t be up until 2014”
And that’s why you don’t see Lugar, Hatch, Kay Bailey etc out front saying this trash. Unlike Lindsey, THEY ARE UP IN 2012.
Mark all these turds for elimination the next Republican primary they are up for. Enough is enough!
What failure?
You see, these people want to use the “Grassroots” enthusium to win elections, but they don’t want us to sit at the table.
It wasn’t the “Moderate” enthusium that carried these historic elections. It was the “Grassroots”. We will no longer be denied seats at the table, when we do the heavy lifting.
“We didnt push candidates that were too Conservative, The Republican leaders let them down. They even attacked them, They allowed Murcowski to keep her assignments.”
Exactly. Add to that the fact that the NRSC messed up royally in supporting the “electable” Charlie Crist, Specter, and IIRC, the fact that McConnell took his sweet time to give lukewarm support for Angle and Rand Paul, and...I could go on and on with their stupidity.
I think Rand ought to respond to this Rino meme that they are pushing to Politico.
And so should one of our candidates who lost...like Buck.
It is time to call these corrupt Rino bastards out in public.
Just like they do to Conservatives daily, for decades now.
You should be very careful about employing a strategy which will not advance your goals. Look a the political realities we are dealing with. We nominated candidates who did not have the skills to capitalize on a favorable environment. We just wanted to hear them rail against the RINOS and then we rushed to vote for them in the primaries. Even candidates with no resume of accomplishment in any field.
The RINOS are a bigger problem than the democrats. I suspect that Graham is already sneaking around undercutting us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.