Posted on 10/30/2010 7:47:04 AM PDT by neverdem
As we enter the final week of the election, everyone wants to know how big the House GOP wave will be. No one has a precise answer yet, but if past performance is any guide, the gold-standard psephologists when it comes to political fortune-telling are Charlie Cook and Stu Rothenberg — and yesterday, both of Cook and Rothenberg showed a massive shift to the GOP. If we use the accuracy of their 2006 and 2008 predications as an indicator, we will be able get a good idea of exactly how large the wave will be from their final House-race ratings, to be released on Monday.
Both men use similar categories: Some races are “Likely” (Cook) or “Favored” (Rothenberg) to go for one party or another; slightly tougher races to call are labeled as “Leaning” toward a party; those hardest to call are rated as toss-ups, which Rothenberg breaks down into three categories (pure, tilting Democratic, and tilting Republican).
For 2006 and 2008, both men have 100 percent records in their “Likely” or “Favored” categories for the winning party (in both years, the Democrats). Their records in the races they rate as “Leaning” toward the winning party are nearly as good: combined, only two seats in two years. Thus, any Democrat whose opponent is said to be “likely” or “favored” to win come Monday will almost surely go down to defeat.
What about the toss-ups? They break only slightly toward the winning party. In 2008, Cook rated 35 races as toss-ups; Democrats won 19 of them, or 54 percent. In 2006, he rated 39 races as toss-ups; Democrats won 22 of them, or 56 percent.
Rothenberg’s ratings are more complicated, but obtain nearly similar results. In 2008, he said 14 races were pure toss-ups; Democrats won seven of them. Democrats won nine of the 13 races labeled as tilting Democratic, and Republicans won all of toss-ups tilting their way. All together, Democrats won exactly half of the 32 toss-ups. In 2006, Democrats won ten of the 19 pure toss-ups, all of the races that were tilting Democratic, and one of the ten tilting Republican. Combine all the toss-ups and Democrats won 21 of 40, or 52.5 percent.
While the “wave” party picks up most of its seats from these categories, it can also win seats categorized as likely or leaning in the losing party’s direction. In 2008, both men thought VA-5 (Perriello) would remain Republican, but it flipped to the Democrats. In 2006, the bigger wave year, Rothenberg missed two of the eleven seats he said favored or leaned Republican (NY-19 and TX-23). In Cook’s case, Democrats picked up four of the 25 seats he rated as likely or leaning GOP.
Furthermore, Republicans can pretty much write off any seat not on one of those men’s ratings. Only once in the last two elections (2006) was one of the two men (Rothenberg) totally blindsided by a Democratic pick-up (David Loebsack’s defeat of Jim Leach).
So, what do all these numbers tell us about the coming House election? Based on their most recent House ratings, yesterday’s, Republicans should gain about 57 seats. But those ratings, even though they moved the needle in the GOP’s favor from just a week ago, could once again shift in the Republicans’ favor by Monday.
While most of their ratings changes occurred yesterday, both men have a pattern of shifting races toward the “waving” party even in the final days. In 2008, even after moving 16 GOP seats in the Democrats’ favor between October 22 and October 29, Rothenberg moved another eight GOP seats toward the Democrats between the October 29 and November 2. In a year as fluid and historic as this one, I wouldn’t be surprised to see even more last-minute shifts than in 2008.
The mutual-fund industry never tires of telling us that “past performance does not guarantee future results.” So too with election predictions. But if the past is any guide at all, Cook and Rothenberg’s data will tell us within two or three seats the magnitude of the GOP’s victory a day before a single vote is counted.
— Henry Olsen is vice president of the American Enterprise Institute and director of their National Research Initiative.
I am sticking with 106 house seats and 16 senate seats.
Focus on getting the vote out and ignore all this hype about a Republican wave coming. The only reason the liberal media would be reporting this is to suppress anti-Democrat turnout. Focus on the election and the GOTV effort and stay motivated as if we were 5 pts down! Anything less than a Republican tsunami is going to be labeled as a victory for Obama. That is where the lamestream media is going with this...
This probably also means that the Hail Mary candidates to upset the likes of Barney Frank or Charlie Rangel probably won’t happen. The crooks will continue to run the sewer even if their power will be somewhat diminished.
While what you say is true, folks like Cook and Rothenberg, this late in the game, are all about credibility as are most pollsters. Earlier, there may be some skewed polls to affect turnout but, in the final week, it’s about being accurate so you can sell your services for the next election cycle.
In the 1930 Congressional elections at the beginning of the Great Depression, the opposition party (in this case, the Dems) gained 52 House seats and 8 Senate seats.
I’m not talking about the accuracy of the polling and predictions, I’m talking about the hype coming from the liberal media.
From your lips to God’s ears!
Wow! that would be wonderful
Solid, logical analysis. This does make the super-wave less likely, but regardless, I think we will gain 60 seats, which is really good. I am now thinking 70 is less likely because 60 is at the very top of that 3-seat window.
But who knows, we could gain a few more possibly.
Shut up and get to work.
Everyone should check out the generic House numbers, which the MSM is burying. Within the past 48 hours, Rasmussen has GOP +9 and FOX has GOP +13.
Amazing numbers.
Someone should post these - I have to go campaign for local GOP candidates — perhaps also we should have an ongoing thread for news on House races...
Note: BO having trouble with crowd in Philly, doesn’t look like turnout is very good
That would mean that McCain, Graham, Snowe, Collins, Cornyn, and Corker could be stuffed into a dirty clothes hamper for a few years.
I have some Woodford Reserve and a good cigar to celebrate your stellar clairvoyance.
Exactly. Paycheck ultimately takes precedence over partisan bias.
This may have been true in the past. However, I believe this election will have more than a few races that will blindside everyone.
Look at all the surprise elections that have happen in this past year.
First, since this is about numbers, two “mea culpas” regarding recent posts. 1) I confused “billions” with “trillions” (brain fart) and 2) I claimed it would take a pick up of 91 seats in the house to get to a 2/3 veto-proof majority in the house when it will actually take 111 (shouldn’t have done the math in my head, I guess.)
That said, here’s my guess at the House based off Real Clear Politics present numbers.
224 now viewed as leaning Rep. We won’t lose more than 4 of these, so 220 so far.
40 now viewed as Toss Ups. We will win about 30 of these because all of the momentum is toward Rep now and a lot of these will be Leaning Rep by Tuesday, so 220 + 30 = 250 so far.
26 now viewed as Leaning Dem. We will win about 8 of these as they will be Toss Ups by Tuesday and again, the momentum is toward Reps, so 258 so far.
24 now viewed as Likely Dem. We will win at least one of these, so 259 is the grand total (double check my math...it’s been lousy lately.)
So 259 minus the current 179 held gives a pick up of a nice round 80 seats. And I think it could be higher, not lower. (I wouldn’t be surprised to get 35 of the Toss-Ups and 10 of the Leaning Dems and 2 of the Likely Dems, and only lose 2 of the Leaning Reps instead of 4, for a total of 90 pick ups.)
Incidentally, to get the magic 111 seats for a veto-proof majority, we need all the currently leaning Rep, all the toss ups, and exactly all those listed as Leaning Dems: 224+40+26=290. (A week ago we needed 5 of the Likely Dems as well, but things have been shifting Rep day by day.)
The dims have always been great at taking credit for everything positive when in most cases they had fought hard to prevent it from happening and blaming others for everything negative. This time it isn’t going to work, the ONLY chance they have is MASSIVE vote fraud on a scale heretofore unimagined. They WILL try it, I hope it doesn’t work for them.
Interesting, but irrelevant as it affects the election.
Gerrymandered districts skew "wave" numbers so much as to make them neaningless as regards house results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.