Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leahy: Allow retired justices to sit on SCOTUS
Washington Times - Water Cooler ^ | 9/29/10 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 09/29/2010 1:51:58 PM PDT by paltz

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, has proposed a bill that would allow for retired Supreme Court Justices to sit on the court by designation in cases where the active justice has recused. READ THE BILL

Under the proposed bill, the active justices of the Supreme Court would be permitted to vote to designate a retired Supreme Court justice in a particular case in which one or more Justices have recused themselves and allow the court to preempt potential 4:4 split decisions, in which the decision of a lower court stands.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; leahy; liberalfascism; lping; obama; palin; patrickleahy; scotus; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: WellyP
Too bad the Joker didn't finish the job.

21 posted on 09/29/2010 2:01:58 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (HEY, NAZI PELOUSY, ON NOVEMBER 2, WE WILL DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Not just no, HELL NO!!


22 posted on 09/29/2010 2:02:22 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I don't have an exact count, but I'm willing to bet that judges are just about as likely to leave the supreme court in a coffin as by retirement.

Of those who do retire, few do so while they are still able to function on the bench. Sandra Day O'Connor is the only one in recent memory who voluntarily retired while she was still mentally functional. And even that's debatable.

23 posted on 09/29/2010 2:03:13 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Um, let's see. How can I delicately put this? DROP DEAD LEAHY - LEAVE OUR CONSTITUTION ALONE!!!

Is that subtle enough?

24 posted on 09/29/2010 2:03:42 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
allow for retired Supreme Court Justices to sit on the court by designation in cases where the active justice has recused.

uhhhhh...NO!

25 posted on 09/29/2010 2:03:58 PM PDT by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

NOPE.


26 posted on 09/29/2010 2:04:27 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I’m another vote for NFW!

By the time most of the Justices retire, they are dried husks of human form with other concerns for the time they have remaining. I would not care to impose on that time.


27 posted on 09/29/2010 2:05:03 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

FDR tried to pack the Court.

You knew this was coming when O went after the Court at the SOTU.


28 posted on 09/29/2010 2:07:39 PM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

ditto that!


29 posted on 09/29/2010 2:09:12 PM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Not on Second Amendment cases, thank you.


30 posted on 09/29/2010 2:09:27 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Leahy is personally responsible for the murder of over 1/2 million Vietnamese human beings.

He doesn't really care.

31 posted on 09/29/2010 2:10:48 PM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Call his bluff! Have McConnell put it to a vote and call the roll right now and embarass Leahy.

Then have McConnell call the roll on a vote for Leahy's censure.

32 posted on 09/29/2010 2:14:11 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

And maybe they can ‘designate’ a former president to sit in the oval office when the president is ill or out of the country too. good grief.


33 posted on 09/29/2010 2:14:22 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Uh, what about a little document called THE CONSTITUTION?

Under the Constitution, Congress has complete power to determine the composition of the Supreme Court.

34 posted on 09/29/2010 2:14:33 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paltz
NO!

35 posted on 09/29/2010 2:17:59 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

How is this unconstitutional?


36 posted on 09/29/2010 2:18:23 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Oh yeah!


37 posted on 09/29/2010 2:21:34 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

The Constitution doesn’t prevent this.


38 posted on 09/29/2010 2:23:08 PM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the minority? A: They're complaining about the deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Leahy is a disgrace, but it’s likely some smart-ass intern thought of this scheme. Leahy strikes me as an old drunken dolt.


39 posted on 09/29/2010 2:24:25 PM PDT by onyx (If you support Sarah and want on her Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Could this idiot not be anymore transparent........I wish with my heart and soul that he would be defeated....no that will never happen but this a$$hole hates this country and the Constitution........


40 posted on 09/29/2010 2:27:09 PM PDT by BamaDi ("The definition of a racist today is anyone who is winning an argument with a liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson