Sounds like the impeached *One will say anything to distance himself from the rookie Hussein.
Meanwhile...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Libloather
To: Libloather
He’s right. Bush was liberal.
That’s why he left office with a 22% approval rating.
3 posted on
09/14/2010 11:36:54 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Life in Prison: The RINO compromise to "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death")
To: Libloather
Clintons and Bushes hurt this country more than they helped. imho
4 posted on
09/14/2010 11:37:59 PM PDT by
Finalapproach29er
(Obama will sink as fast as he rose. (False) Idolatry will not succeed. Be patient, folks...)
To: Libloather
The Tainted One has spoken. Go away Billy and take the Chubby Lesbian with you.
To: Libloather
This is just the liberal’s backhanded way of saying that Bush wasn’t as bad as the Left kept claiming all along.
Even Clinton knows that Bush was the first President to roll back Roe v Wade with a permanent federal ban on partial birth abortions, so claiming that Bush isn’t right-wing is a stretch on anything other than spending...
...and even on spending, 0bama’s recent federal spending makes Bush look like a miser.
6 posted on
09/14/2010 11:40:10 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Libloather
ROFL...Bush was a progressive republican.
7 posted on
09/14/2010 11:41:28 PM PDT by
highlander_UW
(Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
To: Libloather
This is about dogma and big special interest under the guise of the Tea Party. What big special interest?
8 posted on
09/14/2010 11:41:45 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Half of all Americans are above average.)
To: Libloather
Uh, maybe because Bush was liberal.
9 posted on
09/14/2010 11:41:49 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Libloather
LOL!! They’re all in a tizzy about the Tea Party! You all ought to be scared...because you’re all finished.
Have another cigar, Bill—you’ll feel better.
To: Libloather
New look?
What a buffoon. Bush was too liberal on a number of matters.
Nobody changed to make Bush somehow out of step in hindsight. He was out of step at the time.
13 posted on
09/14/2010 11:52:12 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(All hail Prince Skid-mark, Barack Hussein Obama, constantly soiling himself and our nation.)
To: Libloather
So Americans speaking out is abusing private power? I think Clinton abused his private power too much. Badabing!
14 posted on
09/14/2010 11:53:19 PM PDT by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: Libloather
15 posted on
09/14/2010 11:58:30 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Libloather
Wow, once in awhile even a Syphilitic can get it right.
17 posted on
09/15/2010 12:01:15 AM PDT by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: Libloather
New-look GOP makes Bush look liberalNo. Medicaid prescription drug plans, propping up the Dept. of Education with No Child Left Behind, advocating for amnesty for illegal aliens, calling Islam "The Religion of Peace", etc. made Bush look liberal.
19 posted on
09/15/2010 12:05:21 AM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Libloather
Bush was a liberal on many issues. The progressives of both parties have kept the rank and file Democrats and Republicans at each other's throats, while working together to keep any common sense conservatives out of office.
All citizens benefit from true conservativism -- that is pro-American, pro-Constitution, pro-freedom; for smaller, constitutionally-aligned government; for American productivity and prosperity; for a safer, stronger America -- and against the destructive policies of both the leftist Democrats and the leftist, globalist RINOs.
20 posted on
09/15/2010 12:07:06 AM PDT by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: Libloather
Well, yes, Clinton’s right. And Bush’s “liberal” signatures on Nancy elosi’s budgets were what caused the losses in 2008.
Bush’s “liberal” signatures to liberal bills from the liberal Senators in 2002 through 2006 were what caused the Pelosi victory in 2006.
24 posted on
09/15/2010 12:11:22 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Libloather
New-look GOP makes exposes Bush look liberalizm
25 posted on
09/15/2010 12:17:31 AM PDT by
lewislynn
(All the dream solutions for reducing consumption comes from dim bulbs)
To: Libloather
Clinton: New-look GOP makes Bush look liberal So what? Bush WAS a liberal.
29 posted on
09/15/2010 12:31:40 AM PDT by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: Libloather
Bush did a good job on defense, but his $389B deficit in 2008 DID look liberal and is what turned so many conservatives off when they saw the even more liberal McCain nominated. So, yes, those who got involved because they object to Obama’s $1.5T plus deficits would make Bush look liberal. Is that a problem? I don’t think so, at least not to those who care about the burden that Obama and Pelosi are leaving for our children.
31 posted on
09/15/2010 1:09:32 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Libloather
Like it’s really so hard to do? Bush has his conservative areas, but he compromised with the left plenty enough, in fact that was one of his campaign promises.
32 posted on
09/15/2010 1:09:33 AM PDT by
eclecticEel
(Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson