Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: National Republican Senatorial Committee Won’t Fund Christine O’Donnell (Updated)
Mediaite.com ^ | 9/14/10 | Colby Hall

Posted on 09/14/2010 9:38:29 PM PDT by Libloather

Report: National Republican Senatorial Committee Won’t Fund Christine O’Donnell (Updated)
by Colby Hall | 10:35 pm, September 14th, 2010

Earlier tonight Christine O’Donnell was declared the winner of the Republican Senate primary in Delaware over heavy favorite Mike Castle. Since O’Donnell was viewed as the Tea Party candidate endorsed by Sarah Palin, with little chance of winning in the general election in November, this race had shaped up as a the GOP establishment versus the Tea Party Republicans. In fact, just last night Charles Krauthammer called a vote for O’Donnell as irresponsible. Well according to a recent report, it turns out that the establishment — in this case the NRSC – won’t be funding O’Donnell’s campaign.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backstabbercornyn; backstabberrove; canttrustcornyn; canttrustrove; christine; cornyn; cornyn4obama; fund; nrsc; odonnell; rove; rove4obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Libloather
Sounds like it - or she can score the loot on her own. 55 days left - right?

The tea party will help. Conservatives will donate. She doesn't necessarily need RNSC money. However, if the race closes, they will inject more cash and buy ads. You can count on that.

41 posted on 09/14/2010 10:21:04 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m pretty sure DeMint’s group supported her...I think he is a senator last i looked.


42 posted on 09/14/2010 10:21:13 PM PDT by wardaddy (Yes..to race baiters and self righteous type folks here....I am indeed Satan. I confess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Next time we receive mail from the ‘NRSC’ asking for contributions send back a message as, “No $$ for RINO’s but have some tea instead”. Include a tea bag in the envelope or just the outer paper label.


43 posted on 09/14/2010 10:25:46 PM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

>>What do you expect the NRSC to do? Fund a race in DE where the candidate is down by double-digits or pour money into a competitive race in WA, CA, NV, WI or IL?

No brainer or not, the way NRSC is doing it, they won’t see that much money to pour into any race they want to help to have a competitive edge.


44 posted on 09/14/2010 10:28:39 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Perhaps it’s time that the current NRSC members joined Mssrs Castle and Specter in the political bread line, eh?


45 posted on 09/14/2010 10:29:28 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethoven
You have to wonder about their loyalty and who is calling the shots to make such a ridiculous decision. It also undermines the positive momentum of this win. Kind of like Rove being so negative this evening. What is wrong with these people? Do they want to keep the Obama agenda and let our country continue to crumble?
Because they are not on our side.
They are not against 0bama. They are only for themselves.
They are even only for the Republican Party when it is their own private, exclusive party.

A Tea Party takeover of the GOP means they are out of favor along with the rest of the Establishment old guard, and thus out of work, and out of power.
They in all honestly would rather see Tea Party Republicans lose to 0bama's Democrats, because they don't get new bosses, and so they keep their jobs and their little fiefdoms of power.
46 posted on 09/14/2010 10:29:53 PM PDT by counterpunch (Life in Prison: The RINO compromise to "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: beethoven

Good point. NRSC could have said they would review her campaign to determine how they could best help. They did not do this. She had best not count on NRSC money under any circumstances. The plus will be thanking the voters not the NRSC suck ups for her win.


47 posted on 09/14/2010 10:29:54 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

I take exception to you calling me a RINO. There’s a difference between being a RINO and a realist and you darn well know that.

I live in the real world, not some Democratic-inspired fantasyland. The RNSC has finite aka not limitless resources. There are probably 10 or so marginal races that are in play for the Republicans.

Would you rather have money thrown into a campaign where it could make the difference (e.g. a close race like WA or CA or IL or NV) or would you rather throw your money on what appears to be a longshot (O’Donnell is down by 10 points).

What’s the more responsible move for the good of the party there?

If the race in DE tightens (and it may), the RNSC will start pouring money in there. Period. Until then, resources are better directed elsewhere.


48 posted on 09/14/2010 10:30:20 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Perhaps it’s time that the current NRSC members joined Mssrs Castle and Specter in the political bread line, eh?
This is exactly why they will be sabotaging the GOP nominees.
They would rather Democrats win than Tea Party insurgents.
Democrats don't threaten their jobs. Having new bosses does.
 
49 posted on 09/14/2010 10:33:44 PM PDT by counterpunch (Life in Prison: The RINO compromise to "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
please show me interview that has this on record ? all I have seen is innuendo blogs from left wing media sources but no formal statement .
50 posted on 09/14/2010 10:35:58 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Christine would be seated immediately. So why would NRSC not want to help win this seat? We are taking over the party and getting rid of all RINOs. No money to the national party, not a dime.
51 posted on 09/14/2010 10:36:57 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

Since it is money that often throws a race one way or another, you are prejudging the results and affecting them - not placing bets on sure things vs. losses. Quite transparent.


52 posted on 09/14/2010 10:40:08 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

Since it is money that often throws a race one way or another, you are prejudging the results and affecting them - not placing bets on sure things vs. losses. Quite transparent.


53 posted on 09/14/2010 10:40:19 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Send a check to O’Donnell and a photocopy of that check to the NRSC address so they know what’s up.


54 posted on 09/14/2010 10:41:21 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (My new job is making landmines that look like prayer rugs. Prophets are going through the roof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72
I live in the real world, not some Democratic-inspired fantasyland.

NY could be considered some Democratic-inspired fantasyland - no? (JUST KIDDING!)

55 posted on 09/14/2010 10:41:55 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR

Thanks for the contact info. Emailed a rather scathing message to the NRSC.


56 posted on 09/14/2010 10:41:56 PM PDT by jasmine47 (All you have to decide, is what to do with the time that is given to you. (Gandalf))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

I think she ought to reject any NRSC money offered - stick it.


57 posted on 09/14/2010 10:43:29 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Yes they will.


58 posted on 09/14/2010 10:44:47 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
please show me interview that has this on record ? all I have seen is innuendo blogs from left wing media sources but no formal statement .

Say WHAT? The election ended five hours ago - and you want TRANSCRIPTS? Can't you look up that on your own?

59 posted on 09/14/2010 10:46:19 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

No she really shouldn’t. She should accept that she won and the GOP had best accept it as well.


60 posted on 09/14/2010 10:47:07 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson