Posted on 09/02/2010 2:24:49 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
Why is it predictable? He is doing this country a service by pointing out how crooked it is.
Well, what are details when there’s an opportunity for self-righteous, delusional denigration of other professional human beings who have the sheer audacity to be competent at something the shriekers aren’t. LOL
I agree.
Because the place of Obama's birth has nothing to do with the lawfulness of the orders he disobeyed. So, he will be convicted and no further light will be shed on the birth certificate issue.
You are correct there. obama is being protected by the same people who put him in power, individuals whose decisions run the world.
obama is not Constitutionly qualified to hold the Office of President. He is a usurper who was elected with the fullknowledge of the Democrat Party hierarchy, the Republican Party hierarchy, and the main stream media.
He wouldnt order the President to produce a BC he would simply let the defense subpoena it from Hawaii or timbuktoo, wherever little obie popped out at.
Your assertions are illogical.
The Constitution says that in order to be President, one has to be a natural born citizen. There is considerable evidence that fraud has been committed.
You’re saying the because he was elected, he’s untouchble.
No one is asking the judge to remove the scum from his CIC duties.
The judge could have (and should have) granted Lakin discovery. Springfield Reformer explained it much better than I can. Did you read his comment above?
Do you like 0thugga or something?
Why are you saying the judge has no power to relieve the CIC of his duties? That has nothing to do with the case. Lakin isn't asking the judge to to that. What's your point? That Lakin can't ask for discovery? Springfield Refomer pulverized your objections to that already.
And what about your statement "The Prez did not violate any laws" - you mean "ever"? or what?
Yes, but we don’t know if he is ineligible, we know nothing.
IMHO though, he is not NBC because he has dual citizenship but that is not the grounds he is pursuing.
AMEN!
“he is POTUS whether he was eligible or not. The fact that he is POTUS means he was eligible.”
That is insane!
“There is nothing hidden, except to be disclosed; nor is anything secret, except to come to light.”—Mark 4:22
I would tend to agree, but you would have to go through her entire opinion and be familiar with the military criminal procedure before you could say that with some authority. Remember, we're dealing with a system here that's vastly different from the (civilian) federal criminal justice system or the states' various criminal justice systems. By design, the military criminal justice system, codified in the Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), generally affords defendants less rights than any of the civilian systems.
No, it is the case. Larkin accuses the Prez of lacking authority to order him to do anything. Sorry, the Prez has that authority. No judge, but only Congress can relieve the Prez of his authority via impeachment, conviction and removal.
Study up on separation of powers, then get back to me. Until then, spare me your silly insults.
Now watch the interlocutory appeal process begin.
I’m not familiar with the UCMJ, that’s true, but I have strong doubts that it supports a judge creating a false premise out of whole cloth to justify her reasoning.
Nah, relax, this is just getting started!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.