Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie; Springfield Reformer
Not only did the Prez not violate any law, the judge does not have the power to relieve him of his Commander in Chief duties as granted under the Constitution.

Why are you saying the judge has no power to relieve the CIC of his duties? That has nothing to do with the case. Lakin isn't asking the judge to to that. What's your point? That Lakin can't ask for discovery? Springfield Refomer pulverized your objections to that already.

And what about your statement "The Prez did not violate any laws" - you mean "ever"? or what?

69 posted on 09/02/2010 5:38:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

No, it is the case. Larkin accuses the Prez of lacking authority to order him to do anything. Sorry, the Prez has that authority. No judge, but only Congress can relieve the Prez of his authority via impeachment, conviction and removal.


76 posted on 09/02/2010 6:27:51 PM PDT by Jacquerie (There isn't a single problem threatening our republic that cannot be attributed to democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson