Hence the opportunity presented for this poster:
Cheers!
Posted on 08/19/2010 10:43:44 PM PDT by StrangeFeathers
MIAMI – Conservative superstar Ann Coulter launched a verbal assault on WND Editor Joseph Farah today, calling the veteran journalist "swine" and a "publicity whore" after she was dismissed as a keynote speaker for the news site's upcoming "Taking America Back National Conference" here.
"[F]arah is doing this for PUBLICITY and publicity alone," Coulter wrote in an e-mail to the Daily Caller, a political site founded by journalist Tucker Carlson.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Hence the opportunity presented for this poster:
Cheers!
You rock, Susie.
Consider yourself highly commended!
Cheers!
“Anne has a right to make a living as she sees fit. If you don’t like the way she makes a living, don’t support her or her projects. Its really quite simple.”
####
And depending on what she says, she may have to COUNT on markedly reduced financial support from conservatitives.
No one here is advocating censorship, but just as “Anne has a right to make a living as she sees fit”, we have a right to spend our discretionary income as we see fit.
The free market is a wonderful thing.
Cheers!
Any room for truth in your world?
And just for the record, here is GOProud’s Federal Legislative Agenda, copied from their website, my notes [NOTE] added.
http://www.goproud.org.php5-12.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/federal-legislative-priorities/
Federal Legislative Priorities
GOProud’s Conservative Agenda
The so-called “gay agenda” is defined by the left through a narrow prism of legislative goals. While hate crimes and employment protections may be worthy goals, there are many other important priorities that receive little attention from the gay community. GOProud’s agenda emphasizes conservative and libertarian principles that will improve the daily lives of all Americans, but especially gay and lesbian Americans.
NOTE: “Hate crimes” and forcing people to hire homosexuals are WORTHY GOALS!
1 – TAX REFORM - Death tax repeal; domestic partner tax equity, and other changes to the tax code that will provide equity for gays and lesbians; cut in the capital gains and corporate tax rates to jump start our economy and create jobs; a fairer, flatter and substantially simpler tax code.
NOTE: Domestic partner - more “gay” rights!
2 – HEALTHCARE REFORM – Free market healthcare reform. Legislation that will allow for the purchase of insurance across state lines – expanding access to domestic partner benefits; emphasizing individual ownership of healthcare insurance – such a shift would prevent discriminatory practices by an employer or the government.
NOTE: Domestic partner health benefits - end “discrimination” - code words for “gay” rights!
3 – SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM - Bringing basic fairness to the Social Security system through the creation of inheritable personal savings accounts.
NOTE: “Fairness” is a code word for “gay” rights!
4 – DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL REPEAL – Repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.
NOTE: They want homosexuals in the military!
5 – HOLDING THE LINE ON SPENDING – Standing up for all tax payers against wasteful and unneccessary spending to protect future generations from the mounting federal debt.
NOTE: But they want government spending for “gay” rights!
6 – FIGHTING GLOBAL EXTREMISTS – Standing strong against radical regimes who seek to criminalize gays and lesbians.
NOTE: They want the US to police other countries for “gay” rights!
7 – DEFENDING OUR CONSTITUTION – Opposing any anti-gay federal marriage amendment.
NOTE: THEY WANT HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE!
8 – ENCOURAGING COMMUNITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP – Package of free market reforms to encourage and support small businesses and entrepreneurship in the gay community.
NOTE: Tax money to “GAY COMMUNITY”!
9 – REVITALIZING OUR COMMUNITIES – A package of urban related reforms; expanding historic tax preservation credits; support for school choice.
NOTE: They want tax money for old town parts of cities where homosexuals often live!
10 – DEFENDING OUR COMMUNITY – Protecting 2nd amendment rights.
And this:
Chairman of the Board, Christopher Barron:
“We are a gay organization, we only work on gay issues, we have never claimed otherwise. My God people.”
Twitter Aug 4, 2010 http://twitter.com
Please check out GOProud’s agenda I just posted above.
Please read the GOProud’s legislative agenda I just posted above.
You think she’s going to criticize the “gay” agenda? After they paid her?
We will see.
Could you point out the conservative parts of the GOProud’s legislative agenda posted above?
Apparently the only two positions in your mind are “killing gays” and swallowing the entire homosexual agenda.
You don’t see any other option?
I won't buy any more of her books. As much as I miss my dad, I am glad he didn't see her abandon the conservative cause. It would have killed him earlier. He was her #1 fan.
Don’t know AC’s doctrinal background. She claims Christianity; could be an Episcopalian if I had to guess raw. They certainly have current challenges....
Dr. Laura I believe to be an “unorthodox” Jew.
Politics makes for strange bedfellows!
If I understand the purpose of this site it is for us to sharpen our edges as we try to cohese towards a conservative norm we can support, as opposed to say, grinding all our edges off so as to become rino marble mush.
I would like to think we can do it without caving to the homosexual agenda as it is in fact an abomination. They are not a large enough group of potential conservatives to deserve any pandering.
It's seems there may be some truth to that. What ever the reason is, she certainly isn't making the rounds as much as she used to. Then again, it could be because it's August. We'll see if she get more light on her in November.
I would offer an apology but since you are so all fired demanding, forget it.
Source:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=2
>! you have to turn to page 1291 !>
Bingham states: I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill],
which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the
jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language
of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen… . . – John Bingham, framer of the 14 amendment in the United States House on March 9, 1866”
Charles Pinckney
Signer of the United States Constitution, Governor of South
Carolina. Senator and a member of the House of Representatives.
“Therefore, we can say with confidence that a natural-born
citizen of the United States means those persons born whose father the United States already has an established
jurisdiction over, i.e., born to father’s who are
themselves citizens of the United States.”
(I have more if you would like.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1952 The Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 235, 8 U.S. Code Section 1401 (b).
"Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
"(1) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
"(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one
of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was
physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.
Since Ms. Dunham was only 18 at the time that means she Does NOT transfer citizenship to Mr. Obama.
http://www.aca.ch/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=366&Itemid=44
Yeah Ann is known for not offending people and being afraid to say what she thinks.
We’ll see what she says at the gay parade.
There is an obvious fallacy in describing the failure to demand proof of eligibility from Mr Soetoro Soebarkah as “the will of the people”: that would mean that every so-called “representative” body has the right to ignore any Constitutional provision, because that, allegedly, is “the will of the people”.
And of course, in a literal sense, it isn’t and cannot be. “The people” never choose to have an unconstitutional “President”.
That fallacy, and the interpretation of the law which it implies, has apparently been refuted by Marbury vs. Madison.
It does lead to the possibility of usurpation of legislative power by the judiciary, but in this case, demanding documentary proof of birth circumsnances, or even reaffirming a long-established tradition in the definition of a “natural-born citizen”, is no such usurpation.
I guess my assumption was wrong about you.
Most people wouldn't call what I wrote, "all fired demanding"?:
"You provided no source or date for your quote, and you spread a malicious, outright lie. I will be gracious and assume you did it in ignorance, and that you will be glad to retract it and apologize. ~ Matchett-PI
Excerpted from THIS:
"Ann Coulter quote:'Well, I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman.'” ~ taxesareforever
You provided no source or date for your quote, and you spread a malicious, outright lie. I will be gracious and assume you did it in ignorance, and that you will be glad to retract it and apologize.
I did your homework for you:
Carrie Prejean responded:
"Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I think I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman."
[...]
Ann Coulter, wrote that "the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news." Regarding the release of "genuine 'semi-nude' photos," Ann commented that "Liberals believe abortion is a sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are mortal sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being disqualified from the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging career.)" ~ Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California by Ann Coulter
<>//<>
March 4, 2007
Coulter under fire for anti-gay slur
"I do want to point out one thing that has been driving me crazy with the media -- how they keep describing Mitt Romney's position as being pro-gays, and that's going to upset the right wingers," she said. "Well, you know, screw you! I'm not anti-gay. We're against gay marriage. I don't want gays to be discriminated against."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.