I'm picking Ann. She's skinny, but feisty.
Posted on 08/19/2010 10:43:44 PM PDT by StrangeFeathers
MIAMI – Conservative superstar Ann Coulter launched a verbal assault on WND Editor Joseph Farah today, calling the veteran journalist "swine" and a "publicity whore" after she was dismissed as a keynote speaker for the news site's upcoming "Taking America Back National Conference" here.
"[F]arah is doing this for PUBLICITY and publicity alone," Coulter wrote in an e-mail to the Daily Caller, a political site founded by journalist Tucker Carlson.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
‘Am not disputing that many homosexuals choose to live as heterosexuals.”
Just as many heterosexuals choose to live as homosexuals.
I am taking Farah’s side on this one. Very disappointed with Ann.
This is a good example of how difficult it will be for Palin to put together the coalition on the Right that will be needed to win in 2012. (And the idea that someone else would have any chance whatsoever is preposterous.)
I really admire Ann and what conservative can just dismiss WND and Farah out of hand no matter what they think of the birther thing one way or the other?? But they are both acting a little like babies here, or at the least spoiled divas. We are either gonna hang together or hang separately in 2012.
(I didn’t always agree with Bush 43 but you begin to see how good he was at building bridges inside the Republican party and even among conservatives, don’t you.)
This rift should tell us one thing—we’re a long way from home.
Can anyone give a simple explanation of the "Birther" theory, based upon the following assumptions? If one or more of the assumptions is erroneous, feel free to correct the error.
1. Comrade Obama's father was a Kenyan/British citizen at the time of Comrade O's conception and birth, no matter where the birth occurred (in the US or otherwise).
2. Comrade O's mother was Stanley (Sidney?) Anne Dunham who, as daughter of two American citizens and born in Kansas, was indisputably an American citizen and, no matter her Marxist views, never formally renounced her citizenship.
3. Therefore, Comrade O was the son of an American citizen whether born in Hawaii, in Kenya or on some moon of Jupiter.
4. Natural born citizen is a term that is believed to encompass not only those born in the USA (often disputed by those who want to resist the concept of anchor babies) but also those born to an American citizen parent, no matter the actual place of birth.
Aren't 2, 3 and 4 conclusive in determining that Comrade O, however reprehensible an excuse for a human being, is no less an American citizen than Charlie Manson, Bill Ayres, Bernardine Doehrn or Barney Frank.
Please explain what is wrong with my analysis.
“I’m a Christian first, and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don’t you ever forget it.” - Ann Coulter
Exactly. Actually, there IS NO division of fiscal/social conservatism. Attempting to differentiate is like dividing the baby.
“Do you think she will be as blunt and critical live, before the queers, in their venue?”
I can almost hear her now; “Well, GEE, EyeGuy, what do you think they will do, redecorate me or something? Of course I will!”
True...she already has said that she speaks to liberal groups all the time who oppose her views. It is just that the homosexual movement is using her to legitimize their beliefs and desensitize people to that “lifestyle” so it becomes no big deal when it is really at the heart of the culture war. By condoning and “approving” of that behavior, you approve of all sexual immorality which is the slippery slope to pagan orgies because you reject religious teaching (therefore, moral absolutes) on sex.
Moral absolutes are necessary for a successful cohesive society. Throw that out and moral relativism will devolve into chaos....it always has and always will. (That according to a very wise philosophy professor). Besides, America’s laws were based on Natural Law Theory which was aligned to Christian thought by St. Thomas Aquinas and is based on reason, logic, and mathematical science. Homosexuality defies natural law—you can’t have logic and reason in law if you equate homosexual marriage with that of man and wife. You can’t have morality in the US services if you force the men and women to “think good” of something that defiles and demeans the body. Cicero even said that laws that go against Natural Law are unjust.
You can have empathy for homosexuality, I do, because it is usually caused by emotional and/or child abuse, but to condone it is encouraging child abuse.
I know Ann has no children....I have four boys...so am NOT TOLERANT of aberrant behavior that perverts the minds and nature of my children. When you are a parent, and in this world of pictures and mass media where every sick idea can be transmitted into the brain of a child in ways that was never possible a hundred years ago, you get very angry at this toleration of evil and “the culture of death”.
I read an article about a teenage boy in England in the 1800’s that got a hold of the Marquis de Sade book in a relatives library and reenacted the sexual tortures on children who were 5 and 6 years of age or so. You CAN NOT put sick ideas into the minds of young children.....the homosexual culture by its very nature, uses their bodies in extremely sick and perverted ways that demeans their body and therefore, demeans human beings. They equate lust for love.
Somebody has demonstrated for sure no doubt about it that Ubamga was born in Hawaii? That’s news to me.News to me to.
What's happening to Coulter? I like her a lot but she appears to be losing it. Why?
Funny. Pot meet kettle?
You’re on target, sir.
Has Ann Coulter ‘jumped the shark’? I think so. Her star is fading fast.
When AC is good, she’s really good.
However, since she embraced Myth and (unfortunately) continues to do so, she’s strayed off the conservative path. Her attacks on birthers and clear jealousy & snarky remarks of Sarah Palin are indicative of at least preparing to jump the shark. She’s putting on the skis...
This quote exemplifies the attitude that there is nothing more important to human existance beyond the freedom to be ‘me’.
What myth?
Anne has a right to make a living as she sees fit. If you don’t like the way she makes a living, don’t support her or her projects. Its really quite simple.
“Myth” Romney
I'm picking Ann. She's skinny, but feisty.
She supports Romney? No wonder she mentioned the National Review in her “proof” that Obama isn’t a Kenyan. They are Romney backers and have really slid pretty far off the conservative mountain in recent years.
ZING!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.