Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2010 6:52:17 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 08/17/2010 6:52:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If the government mandates accessibility on the web, most websites will have to be rebuilt.

As a web developer, I stand to reap the windfall.


3 posted on 08/17/2010 6:56:08 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Didn’t the DOJ take action against Amazon’s kindle because, while it was capable of reading the book for the blind, it still requires a sighted person to start it up?

Look for electronics to become more expensive and more complicated.

Heaven forbid somebody provide a market solution for the blind.


4 posted on 08/17/2010 6:56:08 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Larry Lucido; Cagey; MotleyGirl70; Gamecock

George: I tell ya, I am hooked on these books on tape.

Blind Man: Oh, tell me about it. These things have ruined me for Braille.


5 posted on 08/17/2010 6:57:18 AM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"Whether it's a Braille reader or a broadband connection, access to technology is not a political issue -- it's a participation issue," said Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.)

Oh. Okay. Well, if it's not a political issue, let's have the politicians step aside and agree not to pass any laws or use any taxpayer funds to enforce equal outcomes and win political favors.

6 posted on 08/17/2010 6:57:34 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; earlJam

Isn’t there, by now, an after-market, crude, speech-to-text converter and text-to-speech converter that will suffice to give someone at least a rudimentary idea of what is going on on any particular page? Hell, even Bablefish gives you some idea of what is going on on a foreign language page, enough to decide if it’s worth staying for more.


9 posted on 08/17/2010 7:01:50 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Is Bob Dole still alive??

I’d like to thank the OR (Original Rino) for the ADA, which gives the cover of precedent to nonsense such as this....


10 posted on 08/17/2010 7:02:42 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’m still mystified by braille on the drive-up ATM machines.


11 posted on 08/17/2010 7:04:29 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (YouTube My Space and I'll Google your Yahoo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Web video means little to the deaf without captioning.

YouTube had a Beta of a voice to CC converter in their players. Given the generally awful quality of audio in YouTube clips, and given the immense processing power required for untrained speech to text converters, it was unsurprisingly bad.

If every YouTube clip has to be closed captioned, it will be the end of the service. It is nigh on impossible to CC that many clips to the standards the ADA requires.

18 posted on 08/17/2010 7:24:27 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“inclusion”... the new civil rights argument.

I have seen public school classrooms turned upside down (and not in a good way) by the mandated inclusion of students who have no business in public school classrooms - in the name of “inclusion”.

Why is it that everyone else has to pay for “inclusion”?

Back in the older days of civil rights, it was about giving people of all races some kind of “equality”, which then developed into quotas and affirmative action which was simply a way to penalize the majority for the benefit of the minority.

So other groups have jumped on that cash-wagon.

The Americans With Disabilities Act is another example of taking common sense steps and creating a monster.

What’s next? A demand for automobiles that can be driven by blind people? And mandate that all vehicles include such technology, no matter the cost or inconvenience to everyone else? I can see it now - braille stop signs and speed limit signs!!!

Many cell phones still have buttons that one can feel and memorize the pattern of quite quickly (I got pretty good at not only dialing my old smartphone, but even sending text messages (though I can imagine it hard to read them without looking!).

I can pick up, dial, and use my home phone without ever looking at it.


21 posted on 08/17/2010 7:31:07 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

What this bill intends to do is eliminate any technology that cannot be used by the lowest common denominator among us.


23 posted on 08/17/2010 7:34:20 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
What next?

Legislation to make complex electronics more simple because it discriminates against stupid people?

Legislation to reduce the use of ‘big words’ in books because it discriminates against the barely literate?

Legislation against music because it discriminates against the deaf?

24 posted on 08/17/2010 7:38:37 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
What about those with no arms?
25 posted on 08/17/2010 7:42:44 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It’s going to be fun to watch the requirement for wheelchair accessible and braille labeled airplane cockpits and controls. Can’t discriminate against blind pilots, doncha know.

And it’s going to be a real riot watching those NASCAR cars required to be wheelchair and blind accessible.

Maybe NASA should be completely reworked so that the space station and all space craft/shuttles be required to be wheelchair, blind and deaf accessible. And get rid of those pesky physical requirements for astronauts while you’re at it. Can’t have discrimination against the alternate-abled.

I know I just can’t wait to see the first blind airline or space shuttle pilot.

And what’s with this thing with NO deaf audio engineers/sound mixers? Grossly discriminatory!!


34 posted on 08/17/2010 8:35:03 AM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why does it always have to be high technology that is stifled with unreasonable demands by bureaucrats?

Quite a few people are deathly allergic to peanuts. Why not shut down the entire peanut industry until they can develop a peanut that never makes anybody allergic?

Get the d@mn govt out of R&D and the emerging products in all markets. We’ll pick the winners, thank you very much, and the googles of the world will invent the tech needed to help the disabled. Not the bureaucrats demands.


40 posted on 08/17/2010 12:14:11 PM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality Now: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson