Skip to comments.
Offer Rejected to Move Mosque Away From Ground Zero to 'State Property'
FOX News ^
| 8/11/2010
| FOX News
Posted on 08/12/2010 7:12:27 AM PDT by rochester_veteran
The developers of the so-called Ground Zero mosque rejected New York Gov. David Patersons offer to provide state property if the project is moved farther away from where the twin towers once stood.
I think they would like to stay where they are, and I certainly respect that and I certainly respect them, Paterson said. Having said that, how much more foresighted would it have been if the imam who is the developer of the project had been willing to hear what we are actually talking about?
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: crushislam; groundzero; groundzeromosque; islam; islamicfascism; islamofascism; jihad; mosque; stealthjihad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Monkey Face
H311 NO!! Do not “give” them ANY land. And whoever approved this permit, or went along with this disgraceful mess after it was “approved” should be prosecuted for treason! Anyone and EVERYONE, including Bloomberg! Where is DHS?? The Pentagon? Have we no strong political voices left in this country?
Tolerance is going to be the death of us all, literally.
41
posted on
08/12/2010 7:50:50 AM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: rochester_veteran
If there is nothing with letting Muslim extremist build a mosque at Ground Zero, why is Patterson trying to broker a deal?
If Patterson believes that is inappropriate, why isn't he confronting Michael Bloomberg?
42
posted on
08/12/2010 7:51:54 AM PDT
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: rochester_veteran
The muzzies aren’t going to willingly give up what is their equivalent to the planting of the flag at Iwo Jima.
If allowed to happen, this mosque will be their tribute to the 19 islamists who murdered 3000 infidels.
43
posted on
08/12/2010 7:52:11 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Never trust anyone who points their rear end at God while praying.)
To: Hodar
Can folk there sue? And keep this evil stinker riding on the courts for years?!
To: layman
Yes .... and I think Thursday nights should be ladies' night .... slip into your favorite party burka and come on in and get stoned.Gutfeld said the bar would be muslim-friendly. That means no alcohol will be served. You will, however, be able to chose among 72 virgin drinks. LOL.
45
posted on
08/12/2010 7:55:23 AM PDT
by
kevao
To: Eric in the Ozarks
They are building a new target for airplanes near ground zero?
46
posted on
08/12/2010 7:55:26 AM PDT
by
ully2
(ully)
To: rochester_veteran
Rev Wright shares the same view that America is to blame for 911. Barry and Michelle share the same feelings, as they attended that Church for more than 20 years
47
posted on
08/12/2010 7:57:33 AM PDT
by
Friendofgeorge
( PALIN / HOLTZ 2012 If you vote Democrat you support infanticide)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I think the five families of New York need to make them offer that they can’t refuse.
48
posted on
08/12/2010 7:59:26 AM PDT
by
mmanager
(I'm not racist, I don't like the white half of him either.)
To: rochester_veteran
Why not let them build it? All such centres become Muslim arsenals, and after its basement is filled with ordnanace, we can just blow it up! That seems like a proper course to follow after what they did to the twin towers funded by the Saudis.
49
posted on
08/12/2010 7:59:52 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: Hodar
Thats why churches are typically NOT in commercially zoned areas I guess Eminent Domain can only be used against Joe Homeowner. It cannot be used against Mohammed Northtower.
50
posted on
08/12/2010 8:00:56 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: rochester_veteran
"I think they would like to stay where they are"
i.e. the WHOLE POINT for the scumbags is to build this gigantic mosque as close to Ground Zero as possible --- it has nothing to do with serving any "needs" of any worship "community" in the area since of course that part of Manhattan has virtually no Muslim residential community (or any residential community to speak of).
for all who are not brain-dead liberals, this makes it even more blatant that this is ALL about putting Muslim symbols of "triumph" at the spot where they slaughtered thousands....
we are dealing with vicious blood-drinking terrorists, no matter how our State Dept. and brain-dead NYC Mayor may try to pretend otherwise....
51
posted on
08/12/2010 8:06:36 AM PDT
by
Enchante
("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
To: Candor7
you are way too optimistic in thinking that we’d ever be “allowed” to deal with the scumbags once the place is built
but otherwise I like your way of thinking ;^)
52
posted on
08/12/2010 8:08:15 AM PDT
by
Enchante
("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
To: Enchante
Who is talking about being “allowed”? LOL. These Muslims have never felt the full force of the American people. What a great chance for them to see it.
53
posted on
08/12/2010 8:19:21 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: ScottinVA
Whatever goes up can come down.
To: rochester_veteran
Do yall get it yet? This mosque will be built... just like they built one to replace St. Sophia... just like they built one to replace the Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem...
You cannot placate them. They have their Dawah commitment. It is the goal of Islam. To make the entire world an Ummah. That all will bow to 'Al'... and I'm not talking Algore.
And so it will be built. Doesn't the book of Revelation say that the saints will be 'beheaded'? I think things are headed in that direction. Just sayin'
55
posted on
08/12/2010 8:28:03 AM PDT
by
BigFinn
(isa 32:8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
56
posted on
08/12/2010 9:02:07 AM PDT
by
Clioman
To: mountn man; mazda77; CatDancer; rochester_veteran; Mr. K
How COULD Paterson GIVE government land?
I’m not sure if “providing” an alternate site means that the land would be given away. There are different interpretations of what “providing” might entail. It might mean he could grease the skids (preferably with bacon fat) to obtain another site. It doesn’t necessarily mean the land would be gifted away— I do not believe that would be legal.
mazda77 hit the nail on the head, however (#6). Paterson has outed their agenda, otherwise why else would they not even listen to what he had to say...
And Mr. K has also nailed down what the specifics of that agenda entail (#5)...
57
posted on
08/12/2010 9:02:34 AM PDT
by
green pastures
(Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Allahu Akbar...
58
posted on
08/12/2010 9:07:02 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(For the first time in half a century, there is no former KKK member in the US Senate.)
To: rochester_veteran
It will be interesting to see if the unions will be willing to build this place. Those opposed should be opening fire now on the many different unions involved.
To: rochester_veteran
Withal due respect, you lousy kuffir can choke on it.
60
posted on
08/12/2010 9:14:16 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson