Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Obama about to forgive billions in mortgage principal?
Hot Air ^ | 8/5/10 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 08/05/2010 6:39:02 AM PDT by Daisyjane69

Edited on 08/05/2010 6:53:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

James Pethokoukis hears rumors of an August surprise coming from the White House, one that will attempt to win backs the hearts and minds of voters dismayed at the failing economic policies of the Obama administration. With the government fully in control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Barack Obama may issue an order to forgive portions of underwater mortgages processed through the GSEs, where negative equity approaches $800 billion overall. Some financial houses have begun quietly preparing for the possibility:

Main Street may be about to get its own gigantic bailout. Rumors are running wild from Washington to Wall Street that the Obama administration is about to order government-controlled lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to forgive a portion of the mortgage debt of millions of Americans who owe more than what their homes are worth. An estimated 15 million U.S. mortgages – one in five – are underwater with negative equity of some $800 billion. Recall that on Christmas Eve 2009, the Treasury Department waived a $400 billion limit on financial assistance to Fannie and Freddie, pledging unlimited help. The actual vehicle for the bailout could be the Bush-era Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, a sister program to Obama’s loan modification effort. HARP was just extended through June 30, 2011.

The move, if it happens, would be a stunning political and economic bombshell less than 100 days before a midterm election in which Democrats are currently expected to suffer massive, if not historic losses. The key date to watch is August 17 when the Treasury Department holds a much-hyped meeting on the future of Fannie and Freddie. …


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; davidgregoryswife; fanniefreddie; fanniemae; freddiemac; frontpage; mortgage; nbccoverup; pitchforks; porkulus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-209 next last
To: Anti-Bubba182

I think there are enough armed Patriots in this country to ensure that won’t happen.


141 posted on 08/05/2010 8:01:05 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Ok...but still...why should I have to pay...for your choices.

And your kids and your grandkids and ......

142 posted on 08/05/2010 8:01:40 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

An owner is only underwater if they are trying to sell their property. If they are current in their payments then why bail them out...


143 posted on 08/05/2010 8:03:01 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

LOL see post # 121 it is a democratic ruse to shell out more money for banks to sit on.

The good news is the democrats/independents that voted for him *he is trying to win back* will see HARP/the directives/rules and know the road he is promising is more of the same old lies.

If he TRULY cared about recovery he would give a payroll tax free ride for 2 years so people can afford to pay their healthcare premiums that are robbing their paychecks to 0 because they went up 2% in prep for Obama taking over.
I literally know two women that just got cancelled because they got cancer.

Will Obama save them when they are dead? I heard this is because of ObamaCare incentives that the horror is worsening.

The only CHANGE this cat brings is homelessness and out of work.


144 posted on 08/05/2010 8:03:03 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
where do I sign?

.

145 posted on 08/05/2010 8:07:21 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Sure, there are laws against overinflating an appraisal...it is called frauding the lender.


146 posted on 08/05/2010 8:07:24 AM PDT by DooDahhhh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Exactly. Maybe I did not explain well enough. The ones that ARE underwater,jobless, are getting NO HELP or assistance.

The program in which Obama is throwing out to MAKE IT LOOK like he IS SAVING all-TO APPEAL TO SOME LOST VOTERS- is only if you are FHA/FM/FM AND you are current on your mortgage.

They cannot nor will bail out jobless folks. Even he cannot make the monopoly money to do this. We are past the point of no return of spending.


147 posted on 08/05/2010 8:08:28 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

see post #121, If you can get it go for it, Good luck! :)


148 posted on 08/05/2010 8:12:19 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

Inflation has really hit the vote market under Obomba.


149 posted on 08/05/2010 8:13:53 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (For the first time in half a century, there is no former KKK member in the US Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
For those who NEVER should have been given mortgages in the FIRST place, but were subsidized by Dodd/Frank/Progressives/Wealth-Redistributors to get "their piece of the pie"......

"DON'T GOTSTA WORRY 'BOUT NO MO'GAGE.....OBAMA GONNA TAKE CARE O' ME...."

No surprise to me, WHATSOEVER...

THIS is what it's all about now, Amerika....

150 posted on 08/05/2010 8:15:11 AM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer; Free America52

“buying overpriced property during the bubble or refinancing during the bubble, then watching the value get cut in half or in third. It is still irresponsible behavior and should not be bailed out.”

Not irresponsible, just a gamble. It always was a gamble and, whenever we choose to gamble, we need to ensure we can afford to absorb even a complete loss of our investment. This is the place from which I think Free America52 is coming, that is, I’m not demanding a solution to my problem but if one is available, I might be willing to take advantage of it.

My problem isn’t with folks who try to make the best of their situation, but the notion, fostered by Dems in particular, that the housing market should have private gains but public losses. I have no respect for those demanding that public monies be used to bail them out when they were perfectly willing to keep whatever winnings they got from the investment. If it was to be private gain, it should be private loss.


151 posted on 08/05/2010 8:17:40 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

Here’s a perspective from somebody not underwater...but in trouble.

I have alot of equity in my house...around $40,000, according the the county appraiser. BOA seems to know this too...and they have been VERY aggressive with me. I am two payments behind, and I estimate it will take me four months to catch up completely. I have got three letters with foreclosure filing dates...and have called them and begged for delay...but I just got another one yesterday. They clearly see a foreclosure which would not lose them money...and obviously my mortgage is flagged in their system that way.

I know I haven’t kept up my part of the bargain...and I have been charged lots of penalties as a result...and BOA has the right to foreclose...but I am slowly creeping back to where I need to be.

I am not eligible for any of the past and likely future assistance plans however, because I have too much equity (almost 25%). This is the result of saving for 5 years to make a large down payment. Yes, I could sell...but the end result would be the same - my family will not have a house to live in.

I’ve got to be honest...it does not make me happy to know that I may lose my house...while simultaneously paying taxes to bailout people who paid too much, without a down payment.

As a side note, my house is very modest. Every time the nightly news has an ‘underwater’ expose on a poor family in trouble, the house is 2-3 times as expensive as mine, and they made no down payment....it just makes this pill more bitter to swallow.


152 posted on 08/05/2010 8:19:57 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

The american tax payer footed the bill for most of the first part of the correction with the Freddie, Frannie, TARP, AIG slush fund to bailout other domestic & foreign lenders/brokers, and other bailouts. Now were going have to foot the bill for the second part of the correction (more funds to Freddie, Fannie, and mortgage principle modifications)

153 posted on 08/05/2010 8:20:45 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

Another means to buy votes for the DemoncRATs. If you cannot or chose not to honor the contracts you sign the government will come and bail you out. All those who honor the contracts they sign get screwed again because now you end up paying for and your neighbors mortgage though higher taxes, government fees etc...


154 posted on 08/05/2010 8:24:21 AM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
one that will attempt to win backs the hearts and minds of voters dismayed at the failing economic policies of the Obama administration

Good. That will really win the hearts and minds of the far more numerous voters who are not behind on their mortgage or have actually paid it off.

155 posted on 08/05/2010 8:26:09 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
This would almost certainly be where we shift from deflation to inflation.

This would be where we should draw guns. How much theft are you willing to put up with? If these lowlife a%%holes came through the front door and tried to cart off your television, jewelry, and wallet, you'd shoot them in a second. But yet, they tout the same theft from the position of "government" and all we spineless twits do is sit and whine.

156 posted on 08/05/2010 8:29:06 AM PDT by meyer (Our own government has become our enemy,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meyer

>>This would be where we should draw guns. How much theft are you willing to put up with?<<

The answer to your question may lie in the two MP3’s here:

US far worse off than ancient Rome -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2563601/posts


157 posted on 08/05/2010 8:35:28 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

As far as I know, the POTUS doesn’t have the Constitutional authority to order such action. Fannie and Freddie are funded by the US Taxpayer (and the Fed’s printing press) and monies MUST be allocated to account for this $800bil forgiveness.


158 posted on 08/05/2010 8:36:31 AM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free America52
But the idea of getting back above water on my mortgage is very attractive.

We should let the government set all prices because then nobody would ever be under water again!

159 posted on 08/05/2010 8:40:48 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

It’s a bit ironic that this report refers to the expected announcement for August 17th...

If you want some history, go back and look at what was happening on August 17, 2007:

http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/31/news/economy/bernanke/

I remember the stock market was tanking with the first shocks of the housing crisis starting to come into focus. Bernanke’s surprise announcement on Aug. 17, 2007 (cut in the discount rate, adjustments to discount window policies, etc.) righted the ship and the stock market took off on a two month run before hitting its peak on October 12th I believe. That was the top.

GDP went negative in 1-Q-2008 and then the financial/credit markets seized up that spring and much more in Sept 2008 (just as the GOP started to make it competitive in the presidential race). Then it was lights-out for Republicans. Let’s blame it all on Bush.


160 posted on 08/05/2010 8:43:57 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson