Skip to comments.
Julian A gave White House Documents 2 Weeks ago. (Per Judge Napolitano breaking)
Fox News
| 7-28-2010
Posted on 07/28/2010 12:44:55 PM PDT by Marty62
Judge Napolitano just reported that he has had an interview with Julian A of W@ikileaks. JA told him that he gave the docs to the White House for response two (2) weeks ago. Never receive a response.
White House approved of Security Breach? Who at the WH received the Docs and who else did they give access to the docs?
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americainperil; barackhusseinobama; bhofascism; bhotreason; democrats; dnccoupdetat; enemydomestic; islaminside; nationalsecurityfail; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nointegrity; notransparency; obama; obamalies; pelosi; ratcrime; treason; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 next last
To: Marty62
Leftists holding up sign declaring their SUPPORT for the leak of the documents today in Edison, New Jersey, right in front of where 0bama spoke today. Other signs reads, "Forclose war, not homes" and SAVE THE PLANET.
121
posted on
07/28/2010 9:09:34 PM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: RaceBannon
awww
right click on the picture red x above, choose properties, then copy and paste it in the browser
122
posted on
07/28/2010 9:20:55 PM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: RaceBannon
“Love the LEAKERS”?!
words fail.
To: RaceBannon
giving it a shot :)
124
posted on
07/28/2010 10:03:28 PM PDT
by
tina07
(In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
To: Marty62
Very interesting..... However it is not unusual for this Administration to release these documents then accuse someone else of the deed. If their lips are moving you can bet they are lying.
To: tina07
darn...smaller box tho’, lol
126
posted on
07/28/2010 10:04:05 PM PDT
by
tina07
(In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
To: tina07
ok, not a smaller box...trying one more time
127
posted on
07/28/2010 10:09:19 PM PDT
by
tina07
(In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
To: tina07
red x’s are showing, my first went huge; second try is photobucket
128
posted on
07/28/2010 10:10:26 PM PDT
by
tina07
(In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
To: MissDairyGoodnessVT
It would help if they had some actual grown-ups working there.
To: ichabod1
mass slaughter of anyone who has cooperated in any way with the US,The purported leaker already said he doesn't care about anything like that.
130
posted on
07/28/2010 10:21:28 PM PDT
by
1066AD
To: reader25
i don’t patronize the place myself i wouldn’t know
131
posted on
07/28/2010 11:38:05 PM PDT
by
MissDairyGoodnessVT
(Free Nobel Peace Prize with oil change =^..^=)
To: LucyT
132
posted on
07/29/2010 3:52:31 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Want stimulus? Look to Harding, JFK, and Reagan. Tax cuts work. FAnnie/FReddie hurt.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
133
posted on
07/29/2010 3:53:38 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Want stimulus? Look to Harding, JFK, and Reagan. Tax cuts work. FAnnie/FReddie hurt.)
To: reagandemocrat
I missed another shot, dont know why, but one guy was carrying a sign that said AFGHANISTAN:OBAMAS VIETNAM
134
posted on
07/29/2010 5:11:01 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: Marty62
“AH, I smell a Watergate type scandal coming.”
With todays “media?” No way, no how. lol
To: chessplayer
True,but I have been reading the stories about the sailor found dead in Afgan. With the WH/NYT/Wiked leaks of the names of the afgans helping our troops. Maybe the Talis will concentrate on killing thme and leave our troops alone for a while./SSSSSS
136
posted on
07/29/2010 7:02:47 AM PDT
by
Marty62
(marty60)
To: reagandemocrat
We have someone guilty of treason in the White House.
To: Red Badger
How can this be true? If it is, then our entire mainstream media and white house should go to jail.
138
posted on
07/29/2010 7:49:33 AM PDT
by
JohnMac
To: JohnMac
They are ignoring it as fast as they can..................
139
posted on
07/29/2010 8:04:37 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
To: Marty62
TOLD YOU SO. Thank You Brietbart!!!!!! "STUDIO B" HOST SHEPARD SMITH: You just interviewed Julian Assange. Now Julian Assange is the man who is the founder of WikiLeaks - released these, or on his site was released the 92,000 pages of documents that lead to all this discussion about our complete failures in Afghanistan and thoughts that we need to get out of Afghanistan. He told you something that I considered to be a blockbuster bit of news. NAPOLITANO: And that is that WikiLeaks presented the documents - there were over 100,000 pages of them, to the White House. SMITH: When? NAPOLITANO: Weeks before they were released. He wouldn't give me an exact date. Story Continues Below Ad ↓ Smith speculated the White House was offered first glance at these documents prior to other media outlets. Napolitano said Assange got no response from the White House during that time. SMITH: Maybe about the time they gave it to the -- to Der Spiegel and the Guardian and The New York Times, possibly? NAPOLITANO: Correct. Is there anything in here that can't be released, that you want redacted, that you don't want release that you questioned the authenticity of? The White House's response was silence. SMITH: But we know that he -- it's his contention that the White House got them and knew they got them. It's not like he -- NAPOLITANO: Yes. That's what he told me. Napolitano explained this is already having an impact on the Obama administration's ability to execute the war Afghanistan from a political basis. "The White House is trying to downplay this, but the White House should look at the vote of the House of Representatives yesterday in which a hundred Democrats voted against the supplemental appropriation to fund the war in Afghanistan," Napolitano explained. "Those are people in the President's own party. When did they take that vote? Three days after the WikiLeaks documents came out." Napolitano compared how the Bush administration handled these situations with specifically The New York Times and was able to prevent some things from being revealed. "[E]ven in the Bush administration, when The New York Times wanted to reveal things, the Bush administration negotiated with the White House, delayed the release, talked the times out of releasing proper names," Napolitano explained. But the Obama administration failed to live to up its predecessors' standards. "And apparently, the Obama administration made no such effort and couldn't have cared less, or that's the impression that Mr. Assange gave," Napolitano said. The Assange interview will air Saturday, July 31 at 10 a.m. on the Fox Business Network, according to Napolitano. Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2010/07/29/wikileaks-assange-tells-fnc-s-napolitano-he-offered-docs-white-house-week#ixzz0v5UJ98Ay OLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
140
posted on
07/29/2010 9:05:12 AM PDT
by
Marty62
(marty60)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson