Posted on 07/17/2010 4:55:05 PM PDT by Cindy
Note: Photo included. "France: Riots over killing of Muslim man Cars burned, police shot at after authorities kill hold-up suspect near Grenoble" News agencies Published: 07.17.10, 17:47 / Israel News
SNIPPET: "Rioters burned cars, attacked a tramway and shot at police in the French city of Grenoble overnight in protest at the death of a local Muslim man, identified as 27-year- old Karim Boudouda, fleeing police after allegedly holding up the city's casino."
SNIPPET: "Police said they intervened after local residents stopped a tramway by setting a fire on the rails and stoned it. At least 50 cars were burned and police said they were shot at once and returned fire."
SNIPPET: "The trouble followed a hold-up in a casino in nearby Uriage-les-Bains by two armed men in the early hours of Friday."
Police said the duo fled with 20,000-40,000 euros and were chased by police. Police said the suspects opened fire, wounding an officer, and one of the suspected robbers was killed in the ensuing shooting.
The second man fled into Villeneuve, where police helicopters flew overhead for much of the night in a fruitless attempt to locate him."
(Excerpt) Read more at ynetnews.com ...
I would rather decide the ‘good parts’ for myself.
oh no, they didn’t say that... they are the religion of peace after all...../sarcasm
Hello. I am a mooslim. ANYTHING you do pisses me off. I will kill you and your children. Your existence pisses me off.
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Aim high po po. Aim high. (neck high ought to do it)
Bring it on darlin’
Yes I understand the reasoning and the rules. It’s not necessary to butcher an article in order to be in compliance with the rules. I’m just particular that way; if there is an article that is seemingly of interest, I would prefer to decide for myself whether or not it’s worth my time to click on the link and not ‘have’ to just to see what the second paragraph (or sentence) says because someone decided to remove it and put ‘SNIP’.
Me too. But if the good parts are buried in too much unrelated drivel, I sometimes I don’t read far enough and would otherwise miss something of interest to me. I also like it when bloggers post a large official document and bold key text. That way I can figure out why they posted it. If I am wondering ‘where is this going’ and skip down to a snip or bold section sometimes it helps me avoid leftie text dressed up as reasonable text or decide that the author started out with something good and got off track. Ultimately, after reading the entire text, I will decide what the good parts are for myself -but I like the snip or bold preview.
“It is now a war of conquest by the Muslims. The French are now faced with only two options: submit or fight.”
Irony of ironies: France just may fight. We all know Britain has already surrendered. Hence, the irony.
Do they riot if it was a woman? Showing the rop in the light of the truth.
Bold text is preferrable (imo). Not removing sections of text. (again imo) :)
“The only solution is for Western countries to outlaw Islam and to make the penalty for practicing Islam deportation.
Which isn’t going to happen.
Which means there’s no solution.”
Of course, you are right on all counts.
Not long after the World Trade Center attacks, I sensed something was very wrong with The West’s responses.
Actually, as soon as G.W. Bush made his remarks about “the religion of peace”, the alarms should have started screaming.
Even our attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq — though well-intentioned — seemed somehow, out-of-kilter. Couldn’t put it to words, exactly. But having been struck with a blow that was intended to be mortal, we did not respond in-kind, or even “nearly-in-kind”.
It was like we didn’t understand what we were up against, who we should fight, or why.
Contrast that with our enemy, which knows EXACTLY who it is fighting and EXACTLY why, and EXACTLY what goals it intends to achieve.
I want to see The West win.
I want to see Islam destroyed, yes, DESTROYED and REMOVED FROM THE EARTH.
This doesn’t mean we should “kill all the Muzzies”. That’s “yahoo stuff” without any basis in thought or consequence. It is not “the Islamics” we must rid ourselves of, but rather the evil spirit that holds them within its grasp.
Those who follow Muhammed must see his image desecrated and shown for what it is: a false idol.
Unless The West is willing to do this, The West is doomed. Maybe not for a while yet. But unless The West faces these truths, its future is clear — and certain.
Pretty harsh words, eh?
Will those reading this please point out my errors, show me where I’ve gone wrong?
Exactly! Instead we are allowing them in in record numbers.
Where is Charles Martel now that we need him again?
“IS PARIS BURNING?”
Yes, it is.
The ghost of Adolf Hitler smiles and says:
“At last my Muslim allies have Republican France by the throat. SEIG HEIL! 1944 is avenged! DEATH TO FRANCE! DEATH TO LIBERTY!”
Yes, Paris is burning...
The only way to destroy political Islam is by way of the complete destruction of the West’s political establishments and the elite ruling classes. They are as dangerous and degenerate as the old French aristocrats and Louis XVI of the 18th century and they must suffer the same fate.
These are the Islamists Enablers - the Red-Green alliance that is a modern day Nazi-Soviet Pact who are bent on the destruction of Western freedom.
This can only be done in a series of Western revolutions starting with the United States.
The bottom line is that either we destroy them or they destroy us - It’s victory or death.
“See? It really was just a little cultural misunderstanding after all. If we would only take the time to understand them.......”
Maybe NASA`s new top priority goal of making Muslims feel good will help.
Their past history doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.