Posted on 07/13/2010 1:45:56 AM PDT by Red Steel
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration.
Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not the President himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ to sue the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group is caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.
A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Yes, dear O ...
“This work goes on .. the story continues .. and
an angel in the whirlwind still directs this storm.”
God bless and save America.
That’s why it is a crisis. Obama took the oath and has been signing legislation, but under false pretenses. The fraud case comes next.
Yes, typical RINO fluff you are. Can’t argue the points,so assume a self appointed role of censorship. No surprise there. You fool no one.
Spot on analysis. Thanks for posting!
I have witnessed them too, and what baffles me is why people are not on their knees thanking God for the justice that was achieved in these decades. It was a beautiful thing to see.
Instead they are fabricating the racism that has been dwindling away and accusing their ideological opponents of it for political and personal gain.
Remember to thank Him for the big things, folks, such as “You helped me raise my child.” And “You brought racial justice to America.” I can’t imagine He is pleased by this denial of what has occurred and the smearing of the innocent.
ROFL!!
I think you’re confusing him with Andy Martin,
IL gadfly, who has sued -0, etc.
This is ANTHONY G. Martin .. from South Carolina
http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Columbia-Conservative-Examiner?showbio
http://www.blogger.com/profile/14894597766174425492
Great ... what’s the message ?
I think the info alluded to is correct and valid. However, SCOTUS and especially Roberts has a lot of crow to eat especially the photo of being palsy-walsy with Obama in SCOTUS chambers where Obama seems to be telling SCOTUS members present that he is the big honcho but we are all buddies. I think this was even before the election- could be wrong on the date.
See #112
To do that we need a media that will report who Obama is and what is needed to defeat him. Thats the monumental work. Its long overdue.But once some in the media come around to see who Obama really is, we should be able to make our way into exposing him.
ROFL>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, unfortunately as history illustrates, bleating sheep did not survive fascist juntas in Italy or Germany.Their wool was used to insulate the briefs of fascist soldiers
and their meat as stew for the pots of the annointed ones.It will be the same here. Good luck with it.All that we have left of them are grease spots of lanolin on the pages of history.
I really, really like this part especially:
“Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.”
Pity: so much FR space .. so needlessly used
.. so misdirected.
STARWISE - could you explain? Not sure what you meant? That Candor7 posting that is a waste of space?
Strange .. are you sure you’re expending
so much negative energy on the right Star ?
Naaah...’Bammy’s the best thing to hit DC and the Rinocratic Party since the New Deal....he’s not goin’ ANYWHERE until 20016. He IS their boy.
somebody tell Lucy to get outa here with her football!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.