Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are you satisfied with the British panel's conclusion [regarding] 'Climategate'?
msnbc ^ | 8 JUL 10 | msnbc.newvine.com

Posted on 07/09/2010 12:04:27 PM PDT by eastsider

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
My fellow Freepers, this is a two-day MSNBC poll that is going our way (at the time of this posting, (60.2% against the British panel's concusion vs. 38.8% for). Let's put this one to bed!
1 posted on 07/09/2010 12:04:34 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eastsider

If there wasn’t an execution by firing squad resulting from the inquiry, then, NO, I’m not satisfied with the outcome....


2 posted on 07/09/2010 12:10:18 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

I nominate the British Panel for Circle Jerk of the Year.....and that’s saying something considering Obamalamadingdong’s commission on the oil spill and his commission on how to reduce the deficit also have occurred in the last year.....


3 posted on 07/09/2010 12:10:24 PM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

While trying to save face, they are ignoring the fact that their credibility is gone, kaput.

Like trying to save an anemic patient with bloodletting.


4 posted on 07/09/2010 12:12:09 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

BTTT


5 posted on 07/09/2010 12:12:36 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Your point that the choices are incredibly stupid is well taken. I’m just intrigued by MSNBC putting up a poll that will not end well for their intended readership : )

Happy FRiday!


6 posted on 07/09/2010 12:12:55 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Considering what they wanted to do to America and its citizens using the excuse of AGW,

your post is NOT out of line.


7 posted on 07/09/2010 12:15:59 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
While trying to save face, they are ignoring the fact that their credibility is gone, kaput.
I tried to make the same point to my oldest friend (from college) last night; i.e., the damage has been done. There are only so many ways one can spin the Climategate emails.
8 posted on 07/09/2010 12:16:41 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

I notice that although the vote is 60% against the climatologists, the comments all favor global warming. I guess that’s because only regular MSNBC visitors want to sign up to post comments.


9 posted on 07/09/2010 12:17:16 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

CNN did a totally false article about the Climategate report but, to my surprise, AP did a very even handed one.

And the third “independent inquiry” was woefully flawed, as were the previous two.


10 posted on 07/09/2010 12:18:15 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

“...science was sound...?”

Guess it was sound if you think 2 + 2 is 6 for large values of 2 as 2 approaches 3. (Liberalthink)

Else, NO to the Nth power (where N is a large number).

I never thought we science types would be infected by the liberAIDs virus.


11 posted on 07/09/2010 12:21:05 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

I hope whoever leaked those emails leaked only a tiny portion of them, waiting for something like this to leak the rest.


12 posted on 07/09/2010 12:22:25 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

It is pretty bloody shameful, I agree.

The boffins at the CRU spent 23 million dollars of your money on this AGW nonsense - and now various talentless civil servants are falling over themselves to rubberstamp the CRU’s fraudulent witch-dunking science.

Bad day.


13 posted on 07/09/2010 12:24:58 PM PDT by agere_contra (Obama did more damage to the Gulf economy in one day than Pemex/Ixtoc did in nine months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eastsider; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; AmericaUnite; ...
More like a whitewash of the glo-bull warming liars.

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

14 posted on 07/09/2010 12:30:46 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“...2 + 2 is 6 for large values of 2 as 2 approaches 3. (Liberalthink)....”

I’m stealing that line.


15 posted on 07/09/2010 12:31:37 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder ("No longer can we make no mistake for too long". Barack d****it 0bama, 2009, 2010, 2011.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I am serious as a heart attack about what I think the punishment for these schemers should be. Michael Mann, Phil Jones, that NASA guy, all of them!

They DELIBERATELY lied, obfuscated, colluded, and covered-up ANY serious question of their methods and resulting conclusions drawn therefrom. The conclusions and recommendations, if seriously acted upon, would be a debilitating shackle of punishment on my grand daughters and their children to be - all for naught but the deluded liberal whimsy of a group of unethical, un-reviewed (real peers), group of hack academics.

You are goddam right it is not out of line. They should be executed.

16 posted on 07/09/2010 12:36:13 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

I think every body on the “pro” side of the debate is guilty of parsing words. They didn’t “Fabricate Data”... at least not raw data, but when you look at the INCOMPLETE data set and then examine some of their manipulations to include dropping of valid data points in favor of a calculation method that fits their purposes, you begin to see a pattern of of rationalization and “the ends justify the means” in the “scientific research”. This is complete garbage! The conclusions (models) are NOT based on fact and “garbage in = garbage out” is quite apt.

I think Shamans, Wizards, or Witch Doctors are much better descriptive terms than “Scientists” for the GW / Climate Change researchers. True Scientists have already punched huge holes in the current “consensus” theory.


17 posted on 07/09/2010 12:48:37 PM PDT by coldoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I notice that although the vote is 60% against the climatologists, the comments all favor global warming. I guess that’s because only regular MSNBC visitors want to sign up to post comments.
Point well taken, Cicero. Conservatives vote at the polls!

I can see November from my front porch

18 posted on 07/09/2010 12:50:44 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I hope whoever leaked those emails leaked only a tiny portion of them, waiting for something like this to leak the rest.
If only ...
19 posted on 07/09/2010 12:59:52 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I hope whoever leaked those emails leaked only a tiny portion of them, waiting for something like this to leak the rest.
If only ...
20 posted on 07/09/2010 1:00:06 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson