Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How judges kill
NY Post ^ | July 03, 2010 | Editorials

Posted on 07/03/2010 2:29:52 AM PDT by Scanian

Eight people were shot -- two fatally -- in four separate incidents in Brooklyn Wednesday night.

Last month, 26 people were shot, three fatally, over the course of one weekend in Chicago -- grisly, but a marked improvement over the Windy City's previous weekend, when more than 50 were shot, with eight dying.

An argument for tougher gun control?

But New York City and Chicago already have some of the most stringent gun-control laws in America -- to no apparent good effect.

So perhaps the real issue is a fundamental cultural disrepect for the value of human life -- and not just on the street.

Especially not just on the street.

Take Wednesday's absurd decision by a three-judge federal panel that rescued a notorious Staten Island cop-killer from an exceedingly rare -- but well-deserved -- death sentence.

The 2-1 decision by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals was based on but a few words of a lengthy prosecutor's summation during the penalty phase of Ronell Wilson's trial, after he was convicted of murdering undercover cops James Nemorin and Rodney Andrews in 2003.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: appealscourt; copkillers; lenientjudges; technicalities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2010 2:30:01 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Liberal enclaves such as Chicago and NYC deserve exactly what they are getting.

By embracing the liberal ideology, the welfare state and preferring to impose laws against the law abiding instead of going after the criminals who, by their very definition do not obey the law.

They are now reaping what they have sown all these years.

I say screw them.

If NYC and Chicago want to keep electing ultra liberals, fine.

But don’t come crying to us when your beloved cities turn into something akin to Mogadishu


2 posted on 07/03/2010 2:38:42 AM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

So what does this mean. This article seems as guilty as any leftist rag at zooming in on a little point and generalizing it to the big picture without showing the context. I would have expected a better explanation.


3 posted on 07/03/2010 2:46:44 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Insisting that their citizens not be able to defend themselves is the single most RACIST thing a big city Mayor can do, along with insisting that there be no school vouchers for minority children living in their cities.

Following the USSC decision on the second amendment Al Sharpton, shockingly, made a statement that he was in agreement with their ruling.

Needless to say, Sharpton’s statement got NO attention from the msm. Clearly he had read Clarence Thomas’s opinion or heard it read by Rush Limbaugh.


4 posted on 07/03/2010 2:55:49 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I thought it was a pretty good explanation. They said that the death penalty had been decided by a jury that had dotted every i and crossed every t - it was a completely sound decision. And the judges in this appeal looked back into thousands of pages of the court record and found three words that they thought were prejudicial and therefore overturned the death sentence. A technicality, in other words.

And the editorial blamed street violence on the message that the justice system doesn’t take murder seriously (not that of cops, at least), not the mere existence of guns themselves.


5 posted on 07/03/2010 3:03:45 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius

I saw nothing about dotted i’s and crossed t’s, except in taking what they were told at face value maybe. This means, at worst, the case gets sent back to a new jury for a resentencing, and with the mistakes taken out it ought to come out as before, if this was actually due. Nobody has commented on what the mistake might imply for cloudier cases, if it were allowed to slide. “Hard cases make bad law.”


6 posted on 07/03/2010 3:11:07 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

They deliberated for 9 days in the penalty phase. There was no mistake; it was merely that the appeals court judges were looking for a way to void the death penalty, and by combing through the record, they found a phrase they could claim to be dubious. They can do that no matter what; if it hadn’t been that phrase, it would have been something else, equally unimportant and meaningless. But it would have been enough to give the judges cover for overturning the decision, which was their intention from the very start.

The death penalty is extremely rare in New York, at least partly because appeals court judges are determined not to let it happen. And criminals get the message that somebody is always going to be out there to save their hides at the last moment, and the fact that they have killed innocent people doesn’t matter, because innocent life is not valued.


7 posted on 07/03/2010 3:26:08 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Was the phrase the basis of the appeal? If not, it should not have been considered.


8 posted on 07/03/2010 3:34:35 AM PDT by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Stop blaming guns for the killings and look to who are doing the killings.

It’s the same group in every city that is affected, and yet all we do is make excuses for them. Environment, a bad home life, uneducated, the same excuses , the same people.

We spend a fortune trying to improve education, trying to improve housing and trying to improve job opportunities, and yet these same people continue the killing.


9 posted on 07/03/2010 3:37:23 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

“But don’t come crying to us when your beloved cities turn into something akin to Mogadishu”

-or worse; Detroit.


10 posted on 07/03/2010 4:04:25 AM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I REALLY want a fund that can be used to buy homes next to where these judges and their families live that can be used to house these scum that are released by these liberal fruitcakes. If the scum are allowed to live, they should be living next door to the people who let them live so they can show their “gratitude”.


11 posted on 07/03/2010 4:04:27 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Ah, the good old days.
Steal, lop off the arm that stole.
Rape, lop off the offending digit.
And in the famous words of Judge ‘Hang ‘em High’

Jury selection starts at 8AM
There will be a fair trial at 10AM.
Public Execution is scheduled for the town square at 5PM.
Attendance mandatory.


12 posted on 07/03/2010 5:38:46 AM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98 ) FIRE ALL INCUMBENTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
a society that is so obsessed with process

Rather than being obsessed with process, I believe society at large is frustrated by the obsession with process exhibited by the 'political class' ... which includes appointed and elected judges.

13 posted on 07/03/2010 6:13:43 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: layman

Politicians pass laws not because we need them, but to justify their existence as politicians. Rather than serve the people and guard the people’s interests they instead guard their personal interests of power and re-election. Judges have gone from interpreting law to making it, also to justify their existence. We need term limits and we need to make sure our representatives represent the community not just in geography but in life experience. This is what you get when you have a professional class that consists of 95% lawyers. We need to change it and get lawyers out of politics.


14 posted on 07/03/2010 9:06:43 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
This is what you get when you have a professional class that consists of 95% lawyers. We need to change it and get lawyers out of politics.

I could not agree more! We need "regular" people, people who know how life and the world really works.

I don't blame people for not running for public office; too many get themselves and their families dragged through the mud. Still, we need people who have run businesses, people who know how to manage their own personal affairs, people who have paid taxes, people who have seen how the things they do and the choices they make have consequences.

15 posted on 07/03/2010 10:37:22 AM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

.....Liberal enclaves such as Chicago and NYC deserve exactly what they are getting......

That would be true if they gave a damn. The murders are a boon. the murders reduce the surplus population and cleanse the societal detritus.


16 posted on 07/03/2010 10:42:19 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... The winds of war are freshening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert
The other point is that the worse things are, the more excuses they have to seize money and power.

One of the great truths of life is contained in a two line conversation in the Music Man:

River City ain't in any trouble.
Gonna have to create some. Must create a desperate need for a boy's band.

17 posted on 07/03/2010 10:46:30 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The “good news” is that it’s only a remand; it will be retried at the penalty phase, so he theoretically can still get the (delayed) death penalty, assuming a similarly diligent jury.

Per the court’s decision: we vacate the death sentences, and remand, 20 because two arguments made to the jury by the prosecution— both bearing on the critical issues of remorse, acceptance of responsibility, and future dangerousness—impaired Wilson’s constitutional rights.

At page 3 of the 115 page Opinion.

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/4d4931e0-6195-43a9-82c3-6473e81f6a22/6/doc/07-1320-cr_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/4d4931e0-6195-43a9-82c3-6473e81f6a22/6/hilite/


18 posted on 07/03/2010 11:08:00 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
We need to change it and get lawyers out of politics

Amen.

19 posted on 07/03/2010 12:01:26 PM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: livius

You got to consider this was a green prosecution team when it came to this kind of affair. If as stated New York virtually never did this as a matter of policy, then when it finally got around to it is it surprising if it did it wrong?

You claim “no mistake” but nobody has shown us what the statements that came into question were that managed to get two appeals judges to shake their heads, or dug up backgrounds to show that we are looking at two Kagans in those robes, or whatever. Nothing but your, and the news article’s, bald assertions. I am skeptical about anything that comes in that form, no matter what political cause it seems to favor.


20 posted on 07/03/2010 3:36:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson